Literature DB >> 29742656

Satisfaction With the Intrauterine Device Insertion Procedure Among Adolescent and Young Adult Women.

Aletha Y Akers1, Jennifer Harding, Lisa K Perriera, Courtney Schreiber, J Felipe Garcia-Espana, Sarita Sonalkar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate satisfaction with intrauterine device (IUD) insertion procedures among adolescent and young adult women.
METHODS: This secondary analysis of data from a multisite, single-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial of women having a levonorgestrel 13.5-mg IUD inserted enrolled participants from March 2015 through July 2016 at three family planning clinics in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Eligible participants were 14-22 years of age, nulliparous, not pregnant, and English-speaking. Randomization was computer-generated allocation in block sizes of four to a 1% lidocaine paracervical or sham block. Only patients were blinded. Satisfaction was measured with three items that assessed overall satisfaction with the procedure, whether participants would recommend the IUD to a friend, and the perception that the IUD was worth the discomfort. Predictors included demographics, sexual and reproductive history, pain after IUD insertion, and treatment group.
RESULTS: Ninety-five women enrolled; 93 (97.9%) were included in the analysis. Forty-five (47.4%) were white, 34 (36.0%) were black, 62 (66.0%) were privately insured, and 75 (79.0%) had used contraception previously. Most (n=73 [76.8%]) reported high overall satisfaction with the procedure, 64 (67.4%) would recommend an IUD to a friend, and 79 (83.2%) perceived the IUD was worth the discomfort. The odds of reporting high overall satisfaction were lower among adolescents compared with young adults (odds ratio [OR] 0.07, 95% CI 0.008-0.68); those who never had a gynecologic examination compared with those who had (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.99); and decreased as pain score increased (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99). Higher pain scores were negatively correlated with the odds of recommending an IUD to a friend and perceiving the IUD was worth the discomfort.
CONCLUSION: Adolescent and young adult women report high levels of satisfaction after the IUD insertion procedure. Young age, lack of experience with gynecologic examinations, and high pain were inversely related to satisfaction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02352714.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29742656      PMCID: PMC6104388          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  23 in total

1.  What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Claire Asker; Helen Stokes-Lampard; Jackie Beavan; Sue Wilson
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2006-04

2.  Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City.

Authors:  Julia Potter; Susan E Rubin; Peter Sherman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  The patient experience and health outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew P Manary; William Boulding; Richard Staelin; Seth W Glickman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Adolescent Experiences With Intrauterine Devices: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth O Schmidt; Aimee James; K Michele Curran; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women.

Authors:  Kendra L Fleming; Abby Sokoloff; Tina R Raine
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Lori Frohwirth; Jenna Jerman; Ronna Popkin; Kathleen Ethier
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 1.814

7.  Self-Administered Lidocaine Gel for Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rachel B Rapkin; Sharon L Achilles; E Bimla Schwarz; Leslie Meyn; Miriam Cremer; Christy M Boraas; Beatrice A Chen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Thomas W Grey; Elizabeth E Tolley; Mario Chen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-30

9.  Ketorolac for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lynn L Ngo; Kristy K Ward; Sheila K Mody
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Karen J Omvig; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  3 in total

1.  Contraceptive Method Uptake at Title X Health Centers in Utah.

Authors:  Corinne D Sexsmith; Jessica N Sanders; Rebecca G Simmons; Cristen Dalessandro; David K Turok
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2021-03-06

2.  Swiss gynecologists' opinions and perceptions concerning the use of intrauterine devices by nulliparous and multiparous women: an online survey study.

Authors:  Yaël Zimmermann; Manuela Viviano; Michal Yaron
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2019-03-06

3.  Improving Capacity at School-based Health Centers to Offer Adolescents Counseling and Access to Comprehensive Contraceptive Services.

Authors:  Alison B Comfort; Lavanya Rao; Suzan Goodman; Angela Barney; Angela Glymph; Rosalyn Schroeder; Charles McCulloch; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 1.814

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.