Literature DB >> 28885147

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations.

Youngwook Kee1, Zhe Liu2, Liangdong Zhou1, Alexey Dimov2, Junghun Cho2, Ludovic de Rochefort3, Jin Keun Seo4, Yi Wang5.   

Abstract

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) solves the magnetic field-to-magnetization (tissue susceptibility) inverse problem under conditions of noisy and incomplete field data acquired using magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, sophisticated algorithms are necessary to treat the ill-posed nature of the problem and are reviewed here. The forward problem is typically presented as an integral form, where the field is the convolution of the dipole kernel and tissue susceptibility distribution. This integral form can be equivalently written as a partial differential equation (PDE). Algorithmic challenges are to reduce streaking and shadow artifacts characterized by the fundamental solution of the PDE. Bayesian maximum a posteriori estimation can be employed to solve the inverse problem, where morphological and relevant biomedical knowledge (specific to the imaging situation) are used as priors. As the cost functions in Bayesian QSM framework are typically convex, solutions can be robustly computed using a gradient-based optimization algorithm. Moreover, one can not only accelerate Bayesian QSM, but also increase its effectiveness at reducing shadows using prior knowledge based preconditioners. Improving the efficiency of QSM is under active development, and a rigorous analysis of preconditioning needs to be carried out for further investigation.Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) solves the magnetic field-to-magnetization (tissue susceptibility) inverse problem under conditions of noisy and incomplete field data acquired using magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, sophisticated algorithms are necessary to treat the ill-posed nature of the problem and are reviewed here. The forward problem is typically presented as an integral form, where the field is the convolution of the dipole kernel and tissue susceptibility distribution. This integral form can be equivalently written as a partial differential equation (PDE). Algorithmic challenges are to reduce streaking and shadow artifacts characterized by the fundamental solution of the PDE. Bayesian maximum a posteriori estimation can be employed to solve the inverse problem, where morphological and relevant biomedical knowledge (specific to the imaging situation) are used as priors. As the cost functions in Bayesian QSM framework are typically convex, solutions can be robustly computed using a gradient-based optimization algorithm. Moreover, one can not only accelerate Bayesian QSM, but also increase its effectiveness at reducing shadows using prior knowledge based preconditioners. Improving the efficiency of QSM is under active development, and a rigorous analysis of preconditioning needs to be carried out for further investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes methods; Inverse problems; Kernel; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic susceptibility; Partial differential equations; Resource description framework

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28885147     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2749298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  15 in total

1.  Fidelity imposed network edit (FINE) for solving ill-posed image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jinwei Zhang; Zhe Liu; Shun Zhang; Hang Zhang; Pascal Spincemaille; Thanh D Nguyen; Mert R Sabuncu; Yi Wang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Automated adaptive preconditioner for quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Zhe Liu; Yan Wen; Pascal Spincemaille; Shun Zhang; Yihao Yao; Thanh D Nguyen; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Comparison of parameter optimization methods for quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Carlos Milovic; Claudia Prieto; Berkin Bilgic; Sergio Uribe; Julio Acosta-Cabronero; Pablo Irarrazaval; Cristian Tejos
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Serial quantitative neuroimaging of iron in the intracerebral hemorrhage pig model.

Authors:  Muhammad E Haque; Refaat E Gabr; Xiurong Zhao; Khader M Hasan; Andrew Valenzuela; Ponnada A Narayana; Shun-Ming Ting; Guanghua Sun; Sean I Savitz; Jaroslaw Aronowski
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Clinical feasibility of brain quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Shun Zhang; Zhe Liu; Thanh D Nguyen; Yihao Yao; Kelly M Gillen; Pascal Spincemaille; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Ajay Gupta; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Global cerebrospinal fluid as a zero-reference regularization for brain quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Alexey V Dimov; Thanh D Nguyen; Pascal Spincemaille; Elizabeth M Sweeney; Nicole Zinger; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Brian H Kopell; Susan A Gauthier; Yi Wang
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Iron quantitative analysis of motor combined with bulbar region in M1 cortex may improve diagnosis performance in ALS.

Authors:  Yifang Bao; Yan Chen; Sirong Piao; Bin Hu; Liqin Yang; Haiqing Li; Daoying Geng; Yuxin Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 7.034

8.  Clinical Integration of Automated Processing for Brain Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Multi-Site Reproducibility and Single-Site Robustness.

Authors:  Pascal Spincemaille; Zhe Liu; Shun Zhang; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Matteo Ippoliti; Marcus Makowski; Richard Watts; Ludovic de Rochefort; Vijay Venkatraman; Patricia Desmond; Mathieu D Santin; Stéphane Lehéricy; Brian H Kopell; Patrice Péran; Yi Wang
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  The 2016 QSM Challenge: Lessons learned and considerations for a future challenge design.

Authors:  Carlos Milovic; Cristian Tejos; Julio Acosta-Cabronero; Pinar Senay Özbay; Ferdinand Schwesser; Jose Pedro Marques; Pablo Irarrazaval; Berkin Bilgic; Christian Langkammer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Single-step calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Shuhui Cai; Peter C M van Zijl; Xu Li
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.478

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.