Literature DB >> 20181424

Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system.

Rafael F Coelho1, Kenneth J Palmer, Bernardo Rocco, Ravendra R Moniz, Sanket Chauhan, Marcelo A Orvieto, Geoff Coughlin, Vipul R Patel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perioperative complications following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) have been previously reported in recent series. Few studies, however, have used standardized systems to classify surgical complications, and that inconsistency has hampered accurate comparisons between different series or surgical approaches.
OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in the incidence and to classify perioperative surgical complications following RARP in 2500 consecutive patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 2500 patients who underwent RARP for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) from August 2002 to February 2009. Data were prospectively collected in a customized database and retrospectively analyzed. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent RARP performed by a single surgeon. MEASUREMENTS: The data were collected prospectively in a customized database. Complications were classified using the Clavien grading system. To evaluate trends regarding complications and radiologic anastomotic leaks, we compared eight groups of 300 patients each, categorized according the surgeon's experience (number of cases). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Our median operative time was 90min (interquartile range [IQR]: 75-100min). The median estimated blood loss was 100ml (IQR:100-150ml). Our conversion rate was 0.08%, comprising two procedures converted to standard laparoscopy due to robot malfunction. One hundred and forty complications were observed in 127 patients (5.08%). The following percentages of patients presented graded complications: grade 1, 2.24%; grade 2, 1.8%; grade 3a, 0.08%; grade 3b, 0.48%; grade 4a, 0.40%. There were no cases of multiple organ dysfunction or death (grades 4b and 5). There were significant decreases in the overall complication rates (p=0.0034) and in the number of anastomotic leaks (p<0.001) as the surgeon's experience increased.
CONCLUSIONS: RARP is a safe option for treatment of clinically localized PCa, presenting low complication rates in experienced hands. Although the robotic system provides the surgeon with enhanced vision and dexterity, proficiency is only accomplished with consistent surgical volume; complication rates demonstrated a tendency to decrease as the surgeon's experience increased.
Copyright © 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20181424     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  41 in total

1.  [Radical prostatectomy - pro robotic].

Authors:  R Gillitzer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Radical prostatectomy - pro laparoscopic].

Authors:  H M Do; S Holze; H Qazi; A Dietel; T Häfner; E Liatsikos; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Malfunction and failure of robotic systems during general surgical procedures.

Authors:  Orhan Agcaoglu; Shamil Aliyev; Halit Eren Taskin; Sricharan Chalikonda; Matthew Walsh; Meagan M Costedio; Matthew Kroh; Tomasz Rogula; Bipan Chand; Emre Gorgun; Allan Siperstein; Eren Berber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Robot-assisted prostatectomy: the new standard of care.

Authors:  Gencay Hatiboglu; Dogu Teber; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Computer assisted robotic surgery in urooncology.

Authors:  Narmada P Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-16

6.  Immediate robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation during robotic prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jae Hung Jung; Francis Raymond P Arkoncel; Jae Won Lee; Noor Ashani Md Yusoff; Chang Hee Hong; Sung Joon Hong; Jae Mann Song; Sung-Jin Kim; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-28

Review 7.  Avoiding and managing vascular injury during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  René Sotelo; Luciano A Nunez Bragayrac; Victor Machuca; Roberto Garza Cortes; Raed A Azhar
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-02

8.  Surgery: Robotic prostatectomy proven to provide sexual outcome benefit.

Authors:  Jason D Engel
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  [Complications of radical retropubic prostatectomies based on the Martin criteria].

Authors:  B Löppenberg; J Noldus; J Palisaar
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience with first 112 cases.

Authors:  Ali Ihsan Tasci; Alper Bitkin; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey; Volkan Tugcu; Erkan Sonmezay
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.