Literature DB >> 28878594

Outcomes of Ureteral Stent Placement for Hydronephrosis in Patients with Gynecological Malignancies.

Saya Kurata1, Shohei Tobu1, Kazuma Udo1, Mitsuru Noguchi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the outcomes of patients undergoing ureteral stent placement for hydronephrosis that occurred during treatment for gynecological malignancies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2009, we enrolled 33 patients with 45 ureters undergoing ureteral stent placement for hydronephrosis which occurred during treatment for gynecological malignancies. We examined the outcomes of the patients after stent placement.
RESULTS: The causes of hydronephrosis were obstruction of the urinary tract by a tumor (n = 22), obstruction due to lymph node swelling (n = 6), ureteral stenosis after radiation therapy (n = 4), and others (n = 1). The ureteral stent was inserted into both ureters in 12 cases, and into one ureter in 21 cases. Ureteral stents were replaced 1-26 times during the observation period (median 3 times). Eighteen (40%) ureteral stents were removed. The reasons for ureteral stent removal were hydronephrosis improvement (11 ureters, 24.4%), a change to nephrostomy (cystectomy: 1 ureter, progression of ureteral stenosis: 2 ureters), renal atrophy (3 ureters), and ureteral dilatation (1 ureter). All of the cases in which ureteral stent withdrawal due to hydronephrosis improvement were cases in which the ureter was compressed by a tumor and were lower ureteral obstructions. Twenty-one patients (64%) died due to cancer after stent placement. The periods from the first stent placement to death ranged from 1 to 58 months (median 18 months).
CONCLUSION: Ureteral stent placement was associated with a poor prognosis in patients with gynecological malignancies. There were a few cases in which stent withdrawal became possible due to the improvement of hydronephrosis. In such cases, the withdrawal rate varied according to the cause and obstructive level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecological malignancy; Hydronephrosis; Ureteral stent

Year:  2017        PMID: 28878594      PMCID: PMC5582447          DOI: 10.1159/000447165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  18 in total

1.  Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of quality of life to aid outcome analysis.

Authors:  H B Joshi; A Stainthorpe; F X Keeley; R MacDonagh; A G Timoney
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Nonoperative urinary diversion for malignant ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  J A Zadra; M A Jewett; A G Keresteci; J T Rankin; E St Louis; R R Grey; J J Pereira
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The management of malignant ureteral obstruction treated with ureteral stents.

Authors:  Anjali M Ganatra; Kevin R Loughlin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure.

Authors:  H B Joshi; N Newns; A Stainthorpe; R P MacDonagh; F X Keeley; A G Timoney
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  15-year experience with the management of extrinsic ureteral obstruction with indwelling ureteral stents.

Authors:  Steve Y Chung; Robert J Stein; Douglas Landsittel; Benjamin J Davies; David C Cuellar; Ronald L Hrebinko; Tatum Tarin; Timothy D Averch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Success of ureteral stents for intrinsic ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  David L Wenzler; Simon P Kim; Henry M Rosevear; Gary J Faerber; William W Roberts; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Malignant ureteral obstruction: outcomes after intervention. Have things changed?

Authors:  Lih-Ming Wong; Laurence K Cleeve; Alvin D Milner; Alexander G Pitman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The outcome with ureteric stents for managing non-urological malignant ureteric obstruction.

Authors:  In Gab Jeong; Kyung Seok Han; Jae Young Joung; Ho Kyung Seo; Jinsoo Chung
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Selection for percutaneous nephrostomy in gynecologic cancer patients.

Authors:  G A Feuer; R Fruchter; E Seruri; M Maiman; J C Remy; J G Boyce
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  [Hydrodynamic behavior of endourologic catheters].

Authors:  F J Burgos Revilla; J C Sáez Garrido; J Vallejo Herrador; F Lovaco Castellano; J Del Hoyo Campos
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.436

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hydronephrosis in patients with cervical cancer is an indicator of poor outcome: A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  You-Rong Yang; Szu-Ju Chen; Pin-Yeh Yen; Chi-Ping Huang; Lu-Ting Chiu; Wu-Chou Lin; Huey-Yi Chen; Yung-Hsiang Chen; Wen-Chi Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.