Literature DB >> 17499300

Malignant ureteral obstruction: outcomes after intervention. Have things changed?

Lih-Ming Wong1, Laurence K Cleeve, Alvin D Milner, Alexander G Pitman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We reviewed the clinical outcome for patients who underwent decompression of malignant ureteral obstruction by analyzing potential prognostic factors, technical success, complication rates and days spent in hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 102 patients who underwent decompression for malignant ureteral obstruction from 1991 to 2003 was performed. Data on overall survival, prognostic factors, technical failure, complications and days of hospitalization after decompression were examined.
RESULTS: Median overall survival was 6.8 months (95% CI 4.8-9.3) and the overall survival rate at 12 months was 29% (95% CI 21%-39%). Univariate analyses found inferior overall survival associated with patients having metastases (p=0.041), undergoing nephrostomy (p=0.046), prior treatment for cancer (p=0.024) and diagnosis of malignant ureteral obstruction in previously established malignancy (p=0.043). After multivariate analysis poor prognostic factors were presence of metastases (p=0.020) and diagnosis of malignant ureteral obstruction in previously established malignancy (p=0.039). Unfavorable cohorts with 3 or 4 unfavorable baseline risk factors had an inferior overall survival (p=0.008) with 12-month overall survival rates of 12% to 19%. Initial decompression of malignant ureteral obstruction failed in 6% of patients (95% CI 2%-12%) and complications were experienced by 53% (95% CI 43%-63%). Patients were more likely to experience a complication if they had therapy after decompression (p=0.03). The median percentage of their remaining lifetime spent in hospital was 17.4% (range 0.21% to 100%).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall survival of patients with malignant ureteral obstruction remains poor. Prognostic factors for decreased overall survival and prolonged hospital stay have been identified. Although the technical success of decompression has improved the subsequent complication rate is still high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17499300     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  30 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrostomy: technical aspects and indications.

Authors:  Mandeep Dagli; Parvati Ramchandani
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  [Diagnostic puncture of the renal pelvis: avoidance of urinary diversion in cases of hydronephrosis and non-specific fever].

Authors:  A S Brandt; S Degener; D A Lazica; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Outcomes of Ureteral Stent Placement for Hydronephrosis in Patients with Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Saya Kurata; Shohei Tobu; Kazuma Udo; Mitsuru Noguchi
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-07-30

4.  Racial disparities in the use of palliative therapy for ureteral obstruction among elderly patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin A Spencer; Beverly J Insel; Dawn L Hershman; Mitchell C Benson; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Predicting the failure of retrograde ureteral stent insertion for managing malignant ureteral obstruction in outpatients.

Authors:  Jin-You Wang; Hai-Liang Zhang; Yao Zhu; Xiao-Jian Qin; B O Dai; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Percutaneous nephrostomy in obstructing pelvic malignancy does not facilitate further oncological treatment.

Authors:  Samuel Stephen Folkard; Srijit Banerjee; Richard Menzies-Wilson; Joseph Reason; Evangelos Psallidas; Elliot Clissold; Ahmad Al-Mushatat; Saurabh Chaudhri; James Stephen Arthur Green
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Palliative management of malignant upper urinary tract obstruction.

Authors:  P Sountoulides; I Mykoniatis; N Dimasis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.471

8.  Comparison of single and tandem ureteral stenting for malignant ureteral obstruction: a prospective study of 104 patients.

Authors:  Kao-Lang Liu; Bo-Ching Lee; Jian-De Ye; Yu-Hsuan Chang; Chin-Chen Chang; Kuo-How Huang; Yuan-Ju Lee; Yeun-Chung Chang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Clinical outcome and management of ureteral obstruction secondary to gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Migita; Akihiko Watanabe; Shoji Samma; Takao Ohyama; Hirofumi Ishikawa; Yoriaki Kagebayashi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Percutaneous nephrostomy for ureteric obstruction due to advanced pelvic malignancy: have we got the balance right?

Authors:  Saumya Misra; Charles Coker; Jonathan Richenberg
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.