Literature DB >> 18294036

Success of ureteral stents for intrinsic ureteral obstruction.

David L Wenzler1, Simon P Kim, Henry M Rosevear, Gary J Faerber, William W Roberts, J Stuart Wolf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous reports suggest a high success rate for retrograde ureteral stenting for intrinsic ureteral obstruction, but few preoperative predictors of success have been offered. We reviewed our experience to look for factors that suggest failure of stents for intrinsic ureteral obstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of retrograde ureteral stent placement for intrinsic ureteral obstruction without concurrent or intended definitive management of the obstruction.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients treated for intrinsic ureteral obstruction, representing 41 ureteral units (UUs), were monitored for an average of 25.5 months. The overall success rate was 88%. Of the successes, 13 UUs had definitive therapy to permanently remove the cause of obstruction, obstruction resolved in 12 UUs after stent placement, and 11 UUs were managed with indwelling stents. Therapy failed in five UUs, with a median time to failure of 1.9 months. Of the UUs in which failure occurred, three failures were caused by misdiagnosis; in the remaining two, the stent did not correct the obstruction. On univariate analysis, male sex (P = 0.006), increased creatinine level as a presenting symptom (P = 0.002), and more severe preoperative hydronephrosis (P = 0.042) were predictive of failure. Adverse events were low, with complications from stenting occurring on only four of 41 UUs.
CONCLUSION: If initial stent placement was possible, intrinsic ureteral obstruction was managed successfully in 88% of patients. Given high success and minimal complications, retrograde placement of ureteral stents can be performed to treat patients with intrinsic ureteral obstruction. Treatment failure is more likely to occur in men and patients with severe hydronephrosis or an elevated creatinine level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18294036     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  18 in total

Review 1.  Current status of minimally invasive endoscopic management of ureteric strictures.

Authors:  Stefanos Kachrilas; Andreas Bourdoumis; Theocharis Karaolides; Stavroula Nikitopoulou; George Papadopoulos; Noor Buchholz; Junaid Masood
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-12

2.  [Diagnostic puncture of the renal pelvis: avoidance of urinary diversion in cases of hydronephrosis and non-specific fever].

Authors:  A S Brandt; S Degener; D A Lazica; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Role of Preoperative Ureteric Stenting in Optimization of Patients with Retroperitoneal Tumors Associated with Obstructive Uropathy.

Authors:  Sunirmal Choudhury; Papiya Biswas; Sayak Roy; Bitan Chatterjee; Makhan Lal Saha
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18

4.  Outcomes of Ureteral Stent Placement for Hydronephrosis in Patients with Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Saya Kurata; Shohei Tobu; Kazuma Udo; Mitsuru Noguchi
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-07-30

5.  Predicting the failure of retrograde ureteral stent insertion for managing malignant ureteral obstruction in outpatients.

Authors:  Jin-You Wang; Hai-Liang Zhang; Yao Zhu; Xiao-Jian Qin; B O Dai; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Endoscopic Management of Ureteral Strictures: an Update.

Authors:  Jacob W Lucas; Eric Ghiraldi; Jeffrey Ellis; Justin I Friedlander
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  National rates and risk factors for stent failure after successful insertion in patients with obstructed, infected upper tract stones.

Authors:  Briony Varda; Akshay Sood; Nandita Krishna; Giorgio Gandaglia; Jesse D Sammon; John Zade; Marianne Schmid; Kevin C Zorn; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Naeem Bhojani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Percutaneous antegrade ureteral stent placement: single center experience.

Authors:  Güven Kahriman; Nevzat Özcan; Aytaç Doğan; Hakan İmamoğlu; Abdullah Demirtaş
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 9.  The full metallic double-pigtail ureteral stent: Review of the clinical outcome and current status.

Authors:  Panagiotis S Kallidonis; Ioannis S Georgiopoulos; Iason D Kyriazis; Stavros Kontogiannis; Abdulrahman M Al-Aown; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

10.  Predicting factors for stent failure-free survival in patients with a malignant ureteral obstruction managed with ureteral stents.

Authors:  Seong Hyeon Yu; Je Guk Ryu; Se Heon Jeong; Eu Chang Hwang; Won Seok Jang; In Sang Hwang; Ho Song Yu; Sun-Ouck Kim; Seung Il Jung; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park; Jun Eul Hwang; Geun Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.