| Literature DB >> 28874142 |
Tatiana Pereira da Silva1, Carmem Beatriz Wagner Giacoia-Gripp2, Carolina A Schmaltz3, Flavia Marinho Sant'Anna3, Maria Helena Saad4, Juliana Arruda de Matos5, Julio Castro Alves de Lima E Silva6, Valeria Cavalcanti Rolla3, Mariza Gonçalves Morgado2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the restoration of the specific immune response after combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) and anti-tuberculosis (TB) therapy introduction among TB-HIV patients. In this study, we examined the immune response of TB-HIV patients to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) antigens to evaluate the response dynamics to different antigens over time. Moreover, we also evaluated the influence of two different doses of efavirenz and the factors associated with immune reconstitution.Entities:
Keywords: AIDS; ELISpot; IRIS; Immune response; Tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28874142 PMCID: PMC5585929 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2700-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Baseline characteristics of the patients
| Characteristic | Included | Excluded |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Year) and median (IQR) | 37 | 39 | 0.32 |
| Gender, n (%) | 0.21 | ||
| Male | 49(80) | 25(93) | |
| Female | 12(20) | 2(7) | |
| Site of tuberculosis, n (%) | 0.93 | ||
| Pulmonary | 27(44) | 13(48) | |
| Disseminated | 29(48) | 12(44) | |
| Extrapulmonary | 5(8) | 2(7) | |
| Efavirenz dose, n (%) | 0.5 | ||
| 600 mg | 33(54) | 12(44) | |
| 800 mg | 28(46) | 15(56) | |
| IRIS, n (%) | 0.1 | ||
| No | 54(88.52) | 27(100) | |
| Yes | 7(11.48) | 0 (0) | |
| CD4, n(%) | 0.82 | ||
| < 200 cells/mm3 | 41(67) | 17(63) | |
| ≥ 200 cells/mm3 | 20(33) | 10(37) | |
| CD4, median (IQR) | 141.08(36–234) | 162.74(71–227.5) | 0.38 |
| < 200 cells/mm3 | 62(31–98) | 89(34–130) | |
| ≥ 200 cells/mm3 | 302.6(234.8–355.2) | 288(227.2–308) | |
| HIV-1 viral load (copies/ml), n (%) | 1 | ||
| ≤ 30,000 | 14(23) | 6(22) | |
| > 30,001 | 47(77) | 21(78) |
n number of case, IRIS Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome, IQR Interquartile Range
Fig. 1The ELISPOT assay performed in TB/HIV patients. The results of IFN-γ-producing cells in response to the specific antigens for a PPD, b ESAT-6 c 38 kDa/CFP-10 are expressed in log10 for spot forming cells (CFS). The colored points represent the magnitude of the response, and the gray points non-responders. Horizontal lines represent the median values. The statistical difference in the median number of CFS between consecutive visits was assessed through the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (***p < 0.01;**p < 0.05 and *p < 0.1). The results were also expressed as the percentage of individuals responsive to the antigens d PPD, e ESAT-6 and f 38 kDa/CFP-10, and individuals were considered responders with ≥50 spots/106 cells. The Exact McNemar test (***p < 0.01;**p < 0.05 and *p < 0.1) was used to assess the difference of the response between consecutive visits
Univariate and multivariate analyses of the factors associated with IFN-γ production in response to the PPD antigen
| Factor | Univariable | Multivariablea | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (IC95%) |
| (IC95%) |
| |
| Baseline CD4 | ||||
| ≥ 200 cells/mm3 | 1 | 1 | ||
| < 200 cells/mm3 | 1.375 (0.332;5.694) | 0.661 | 5.547 (1.348;22.821) |
|
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 1 | |||
| Female | 0.242 (0.052; 1.118) | 0.069 | ||
| Age (Year) | ||||
| 38–44 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32–18 | 3.87 (1.336;11.212) |
| 2.808 (1.13;6.98) |
|
| 37–32 | 1.256 (0.305;5.169) | 0.752 | 1.061 (0.292; 3.862) | 0.928 |
| Site of tuberculosis | ||||
| Pulmonary | 1 | 1 | ||
| Disseminated | 1.173 (0.285; 4.836) | 0.825 | 1.531 (0.468; 5.01) | 0.482 |
| Extrapulmonary | 4.275 (1.122; 16.285) |
| 6.431 (1.566; 26.408) |
|
| Ethnicity | ||||
| White | 1 | |||
| Black | 2.544 (0.603; 10.737) | 0.204 | ||
| Mulattoes | 1.376 (0.283; 6.705) | 0.692 | ||
| Efavirenz dose | ||||
| 600 mg | 1 | 1 | ||
| 800 mg | 3.187 (0.901;11.266) |
| 3.505 (1.04;11.817) |
|
| HIV-1 viral load | ||||
| Detectable | 1 | |||
| Undetectable | 2.348 (1.228;4.489) | 0.010 | ||
| Follow-up CD4 cells/mm3 | ||||
| ≥200 cells/mm3 | 1.003 (1.001; 1.005) |
| 1.006 (1.003; 1.009) |
|
| <200 cells/mm3 | 1.004 (0.996; 1.1014) | 0.312 | 1.011 (1.002; 1.02) |
|
| Follow-up %HLA-DR+/CD3+ T cells | 0.994 (0.975; 1.014) | 0.559 | ||
| Follow-up % CD8+/38+ T cells | 0.998 (0.972; 1.024) | 0.851 | ||
| Follow-up IFN-γ plasmatic | 0.989 (0.946; 1.033) | 0.61 | ||
aThe predictors in the PPD antigen final model are as follows: Baseline CD4, Age, Site of tuberculosis, Efavirenz dose, Follow-up CD4 ≥ 200 cells/mm3 and Follow-up CD4 < 200 cells/mm3
Univariate and multivariate analyses of the factors associated with IFN-γ production in response 38KDa/CFP-10 antigen
| Factor | Univariable | Multivariablea | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (IC95%) |
| (IC95%) |
| |
| Baseline CD4 | ||||
| ≥ 200 cells/mm3 | 1 | |||
| < 200 cells/mm3 | 1.189 (0.341; 4.143) | 0.786 | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 1 | |||
| Female | 0.5 (0.131; 1.9) | 0.309 | ||
| Age (Year) | ||||
| 38–44 | 1 | |||
| 32–18 | 0.928 (0.225; 3.828) | 0.917 | ||
| 37–32 | 1.594 (0.371; 6.855) | 0.531 | ||
| Site of tuberculosis | ||||
| Pulmonary | 1 | 1 | ||
| Disseminated | 1.308 (0.345; 4.954) | 0.693 | 1.632 (0.469; 5.681) | 0.441 |
| Extrapulmonary | 3.84 (0.895; 16.474) |
| 3.054 (0.889; 10.494) | 0.076 |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| White | 1 | |||
| Black | 2.128 (0.373; 12.15) | 0.396 | ||
| Mulattoes | 1.29 (0.36; 4.619) | 0.696 | ||
| Efavirenz dose | ||||
| 600 mg | 1 | 1 | ||
| 800 mg | 2.29 (0.658; 7.971) | 0.193 | 2.765 (0.862; 8.865) | 0.087 |
| HIV-1 viral load | ||||
| Detectable | 1 | 1 | ||
| Undetectable | 2.078 (1.19; 3.627) |
| 2.217 (1.258; 3.906) |
|
| Follow-up CD4 cells/mm3 | ||||
| < 200 cells/mm3 | 0.999 (0.994; 1.003) | 0.559 | ||
| ≥ 200cells/mm3 | 1.002 (1; 1.004) |
| 1.002 (1; 1.003) |
|
| Follow-up %HLA-DR+/CD3+ T cells | 1.007 (0.993; 1.022) | 0.340 | ||
| Follow-up % CD8+/38+ T cells | 1.008 (0.992; 1.025) | 0.327 | 1.017 (0.999; 1.035) | 0.061 |
| Follow-up IFN-γ plasmatic | 0.995 (0.951; 1.04) | 0.817 | ||
aThe predictors in 38 K Da/CFP-10 antigen final model are as follow: Follow-up CD4 cells/mm3 (≥ 200cells/mm3), Site of tuberculosis, Efavirenz dose, HIV-1 viral load and Follow-up % CD8+/38+ T cells
Fig. 2Graphic representation of the trajectories of the IFN-γ-producing cells in response to specific antigens for a PPD and b 38 kDa/CFP-10 in IRIS and non-IRIS patients during TB treatment and cART. Overall trajectories are represented as red thin lines for the IRIS group and a green thin line for the non-IRIS group. The dotted lines represent the overall 95% confidence interval for each group