Literature DB >> 28874063

Venous Thromboprophylaxis With Neuromuscular Stimulation: Is It Calf Muscle Pumping or Just Twitches and Jerks?

Christopher R Lattimer1, Vassilios Zymvragoudakis2, George Geroulakos1,2, Evi Kalodiki1.   

Abstract

The common peroneal nerve stimulator (CPNS) is a UK-approved device for reducing venous thromboembolism risk. It resembles a wrist watch and is placed over the common peroneal nerve to fire at 1 electrical impulse/sec. The aim was to quantify the claim that it drives the venous muscle pump and imitates walking. Twelve healthy volunteers performed 10 tip-toe maneuvers and 10 ankle dorsiflexions to imitate walking movements. The reductions in calf volume were recorded using air plethysmography (APG). The common peroneal nerve was stimulated for over 10 seconds at each of the 7 increasing electrical impulse settings, and the volume reductions were measured for comparison. The results are expressed as median (interquartile range) absolute (mL), and percentage reduction in calf volume. Tip-toe and dorsiflexion pumping maneuvers were not significantly different: 59 (33.6-96.1), 81.9% vs 51.4 (34-68.5), 59.7%, respectively ( P = .53). However, they both outperformed the CPNS: 10.8 (7.3-18), 13.2% at P = .002 and P = .002, respectively. Qualitatively, the CPNS registered on the tracings as a small spike (muscle twitch) at low settings, with larger amplitudes (ankle jerk) at higher settings. The CPNS activity spikes were discrete, lasting a median (range) of 0.24 (0.16- .3) seconds. The claim that the CPNS empties veins by pumping is supported statistically. However, the amount is small versus the tip-toe and dorsiflexion maneuvers. Furthermore, the CPNS has a short activity profile on the APG trace. Innovations that produce sustained contraction and involve the posterior calf compartments may improve pumping.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air plethysmography; calf muscle pump; common peroneal nerve stimulation; geko; mechanical thromboprophylaxis; neuromuscular stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28874063      PMCID: PMC6714654          DOI: 10.1177/1076029617726601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost        ISSN: 1076-0296            Impact factor:   2.389


  14 in total

Review 1.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for thromboprophylaxis: A systematic review.

Authors:  S Hajibandeh; S Hajibandeh; G A Antoniou; J R H Scurr; F Torella
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 1.740

2.  Haemodynamic changes with the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation compared to intermittent pneumatic compression.

Authors:  K J Williams; H M Moore; A H Davies
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 1.740

3.  The effectiveness of a novel neuromuscular electrostimulation method versus intermittent pneumatic compression in enhancing lower limb blood flow.

Authors:  Huda Jawad; Duncan S Bain; Helen Dawson; Kate Crawford; Atholl Johnston; Arthur Tucker
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2014-01-28

Review 4.  The Use of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Postoperative Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sandra O'Connell; Khalid Bashar; Barry J Broderick; James Sheehan; Fabio Quondamatteo; Stewart R Walsh; Gearoid ÓLaighin; Leo R Quinlan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The efficacy of a new stimulation technology to increase venous flow and prevent venous stasis.

Authors:  M Griffin; A N Nicolaides; D Bond; G Geroulakos; E Kalodiki
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  A clinical comparison of pneumatic compression devices: the basis for selection.

Authors:  M C Proctor; L J Greenfield; T W Wakefield; P J Zajkowski
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 7.  Virchow's triad revisited: abnormal flow.

Authors:  Gordon D O Lowe
Journal:  Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb       Date:  2003 Sep-2004 Dec

8.  Measurement of blood flow in the deep veins of the lower limb using the geko™ neuromuscular electro-stimulation device.

Authors:  Maura Griffin; Dawn Bond; Andrew Nicolaides
Journal:  Int Angiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Neuromuscular electrostimulation viathe common peroneal nerve promotes lower limb blood flow in a below-kneecast: A potential for thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  D J Warwick; A Shaikh; S Gadola; M Stokes; P Worsley; D Bain; A T Tucker; S D Gadola
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 10.  Thigh length versus knee length antiembolism stockings for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in postoperative surgical patients; a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ros Wade; Fiona Paton; Stephen Rice; Gerard Stansby; Peter Millner; Hayley Flavell; Dave Fox; Nerys Woolacott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects on venous flow of transcutaneous electrical stimulation, neuromuscular stimulation, and sham stimulation on soleus muscle: A randomized crossover study in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Francisco Senin-Camargo; Alicia Martínez-Rodríguez; Marcelo Chouza-Insua; Isabel Raposo-Vidal; M Amalia Jácome
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.