Literature DB >> 26934561

Measurement of blood flow in the deep veins of the lower limb using the geko™ neuromuscular electro-stimulation device.

Maura Griffin1, Dawn Bond, Andrew Nicolaides.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previous study using electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve (geko™) to activate the venous muscle pump measured blood flow in both the femoral and popliteal veins. Increased blood flow by as much as 60% was demonstrated in the femoral vein. Such an increase is assumed to be as a result of an increase in venous flow from the deep calf veins; however this has yet to be confirmed. The aim of this study was to conduct direct measurements in these deep calf veins to confirm this assumption in healthy individuals.
METHODS: This was a single centre open-label intra-subject healthy volunteer comparison of blood flow in the peroneal, posterior tibial and gastrocnemial veins with and without the geko™ device. The device was applied to 18 volunteers. Peak venous velocity (PV) and ejected volume per individual stimulus (VS) and volume flow (VF) was determined using ultrasound.
RESULTS: Peak velocity (PV) increased 216% in the peroneal vein, by 112% in the posterior tibial vein and by 137% in the gastrocnemial vein (P<0.001). Ejected volume per stimulus increased by 113% in the peroneal vein, by 38% in the posterior tibial vein and by 50% in the gastrocnemial vein (P<0.003). Associated volume flows during the muscle contraction were increased by 36%, 25% and 17%, respectively (P=0.05)
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time that neuromuscular electro-stimulation has been shown to be an effective method of increasing flow in the axial deep veins of the calf. Significant increases in velocity and volume flow in response to the electrical stimulus were seen in all three veins studied. Enhancements of both blood velocity and volume flow are key factors in the prevention of venous stasis and ultimately deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Further studies are justified to determine the efficacy of the device in the prevention of DVT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26934561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Angiol        ISSN: 0392-9590            Impact factor:   2.789


  5 in total

1.  Venous Thromboprophylaxis With Neuromuscular Stimulation: Is It Calf Muscle Pumping or Just Twitches and Jerks?

Authors:  Christopher R Lattimer; Vassilios Zymvragoudakis; George Geroulakos; Evi Kalodiki
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.389

2.  A feasibility randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel neuromuscular electro-stimulation device in preventing the formation of oedema following total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  Thomas W Wainwright; Louise C Burgess; Robert G Middleton
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-07-18

3.  Evaluation of a muscle pump-activating device for non-healing venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Connie Harris; Rochelle Duong; Gwen Vanderheyden; Beth Byrnes; Renee Cattryse; Ava Orr; David Keast
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Enhanced Recovery After Total Hip Replacement Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  YiBo Zhao; Baifeng Zhang; Yongzhi Wang; Jingwei Liu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-23

Review 5.  Electrical muscle stimulation in thomboprophylaxis: review and a derived hypothesis about thrombogenesis-the 4th factor.

Authors:  Christos Stefanou
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.