Jianfei Liu1, HaeWon Jung1, Alfredo Dubra2, Johnny Tam1. 1. Ophthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) has enabled quantification of the photoreceptor mosaic in the living human eye using metrics such as cell density and average spacing. These rely on the identification of individual cells. Here, we demonstrate a novel approach for computer-aided identification of cone photoreceptors on nonconfocal split detection AOSLO images. Methods: Algorithms for identification of cone photoreceptors were developed, based on multiscale circular voting (MSCV) in combination with a priori knowledge that split detection images resemble Nomarski differential interference contrast images, in which dark and bright regions are present on the two sides of each cell. The proposed algorithm locates dark and bright region pairs, iteratively refining the identification across multiple scales. Identification accuracy was assessed in data from 10 subjects by comparing automated identifications with manual labeling, followed by computation of density and spacing metrics for comparison to histology and published data. Results: There was good agreement between manual and automated cone identifications with overall recall, precision, and F1 score of 92.9%, 90.8%, and 91.8%, respectively. On average, computed density and spacing values using automated identification were within 10.7% and 11.2% of the expected histology values across eccentricities ranging from 0.5 to 6.2 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between MSCV-based and histology-based density measurements (P = 0.96, Kolmogorov-Smirnov 2-sample test). Conclusions: MSCV can accurately detect cone photoreceptors on split detection images across a range of eccentricities, enabling quick, objective estimation of photoreceptor mosaic metrics, which will be important for future clinical trials utilizing adaptive optics.
Purpose: Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) has enabled quantification of the photoreceptor mosaic in the living human eye using metrics such as cell density and average spacing. These rely on the identification of individual cells. Here, we demonstrate a novel approach for computer-aided identification of cone photoreceptors on nonconfocal split detection AOSLO images. Methods: Algorithms for identification of cone photoreceptors were developed, based on multiscale circular voting (MSCV) in combination with a priori knowledge that split detection images resemble Nomarski differential interference contrast images, in which dark and bright regions are present on the two sides of each cell. The proposed algorithm locates dark and bright region pairs, iteratively refining the identification across multiple scales. Identification accuracy was assessed in data from 10 subjects by comparing automated identifications with manual labeling, followed by computation of density and spacing metrics for comparison to histology and published data. Results: There was good agreement between manual and automated cone identifications with overall recall, precision, and F1 score of 92.9%, 90.8%, and 91.8%, respectively. On average, computed density and spacing values using automated identification were within 10.7% and 11.2% of the expected histology values across eccentricities ranging from 0.5 to 6.2 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between MSCV-based and histology-based density measurements (P = 0.96, Kolmogorov-Smirnov 2-sample test). Conclusions: MSCV can accurately detect cone photoreceptors on split detection images across a range of eccentricities, enabling quick, objective estimation of photoreceptor mosaic metrics, which will be important for future clinical trials utilizing adaptive optics.
Authors: Bahram Parvin; Qing Yang; Ju Han; Hang Chang; Bjorn Rydberg; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff Journal: IEEE Trans Image Process Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 10.856
Authors: Stephen A Burns; Remy Tumbar; Ann E Elsner; Daniel Ferguson; Daniel X Hammer Journal: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Jacque L Duncan; Yuhua Zhang; Jarel Gandhi; Chiaki Nakanishi; Mohammad Othman; Kari E H Branham; Anand Swaroop; Austin Roorda Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rigmor C Baraas; Joseph Carroll; Karen L Gunther; Mina Chung; David R Williams; David H Foster; Maureen Neitz Journal: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: HaeWon Jung; Jianfei Liu; Tao Liu; Aman George; Margery G Smelkinson; Sarah Cohen; Ruchi Sharma; Owen Schwartz; Arvydas Maminishkis; Kapil Bharti; Catherine Cukras; Laryssa A Huryn; Brian P Brooks; Robert Fariss; Johnny Tam Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-03-21
Authors: Stephen A Burns; Ann E Elsner; Kaitlyn A Sapoznik; Raymond L Warner; Thomas J Gast Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Jared Hamwood; David Alonso-Caneiro; Danuta M Sampson; Michael J Collins; Fred K Chen Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Jessica I W Morgan; Grace K Vergilio; Jessica Hsu; Alfredo Dubra; Robert F Cooper Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 3.283