Literature DB >> 28872442

Added Value of Computer-aided CT Image Features for Early Lung Cancer Diagnosis with Small Pulmonary Nodules: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Peng Huang1, Seyoun Park1, Rongkai Yan1, Junghoon Lee1, Linda C Chu1, Cheng T Lin1, Amira Hussien1, Joshua Rathmell1, Brett Thomas1, Chen Chen1, Russell Hales1, David S Ettinger1, Malcolm Brock1, Ping Hu1, Elliot K Fishman1, Edward Gabrielson1, Stephen Lam1.   

Abstract

Purpose To test whether computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) approaches can increase the positive predictive value (PPV) and reduce the false-positive rate in lung cancer screening for small nodules compared with human reading by thoracic radiologists. Materials and Methods A matched case-control sample of low-dose computed tomography (CT) studies in 186 participants with 4-20-mm noncalcified lung nodules who underwent biopsy in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was selected. Variables used for matching were age, sex, smoking status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status, body mass index, study year of the positive screening test, and screening results. Studies before lung biopsy were randomly split into a training set (70 cancers plus 70 benign controls) and a validation set (20 cancers plus 26 benign controls). Image features from within and outside dominant nodules were extracted. A CAD algorithm developed from the training set and a random forest classifier were applied to the validation set to predict biopsy outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the prediction accuracy of CAD with the NLST investigator's diagnosis and readings from three experienced and board-certified thoracic radiologists who used contemporary clinical practice guidelines. Results In the validation cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for CAD was 0.9154. By default, the sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of the NLST investigators were 1.00, 0.00, and 0.43, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value of CAD and the three radiologists' combined reading were 0.95, 0.88, 0.86, and 0.96 and 0.70, 0.69, 0.64, and 0.75, respectively. Conclusion CAD could increase PPV and reduce the false-positive rate in the early diagnosis of lung cancer. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28872442      PMCID: PMC5779085          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

1.  Malignant versus benign nodules at CT screening for lung cancer: comparison of thin-section CT findings.

Authors:  Feng Li; Shusuke Sone; Hiroyuki Abe; Heber Macmahon; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Adjusting O'Brien's test to control type I error for the generalized nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem.

Authors:  Peng Huang; Barbara C Tilley; Robert F Woolson; Stuart Lipsitz
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Non-small cell lung cancer: histopathologic correlates for texture parameters at CT.

Authors:  Balaji Ganeshan; Vicky Goh; Henry C Mandeville; Quan Sing Ng; Peter J Hoskin; Kenneth A Miles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  CT texture analysis of renal masses: pilot study using random forest classification for prediction of pathology.

Authors:  Siva P Raman; Yifei Chen; James L Schroeder; Peng Huang; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Noninvasive Computed Tomography-based Risk Stratification of Lung Adenocarcinomas in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Fabien Maldonado; Fenghai Duan; Sushravya M Raghunath; Srinivasan Rajagopalan; Ronald A Karwoski; Kavita Garg; Erin Greco; Hrudaya Nath; Richard A Robb; Brian J Bartholmai; Tobias Peikert
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Comparative analysis of 5 lung cancer natural history and screening models that reproduce outcomes of the NLST and PLCO trials.

Authors:  Rafael Meza; Kevin ten Haaf; Chung Yin Kong; Ayca Erdogan; William C Black; Martin C Tammemagi; Sung Eun Choi; Jihyoun Jeon; Summer S Han; Vidit Munshi; Joost van Rosmalen; Paul Pinsky; Pamela M McMahon; Harry J de Koning; Eric J Feuer; William D Hazelton; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Noninvasive risk stratification of lung adenocarcinoma using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Sushravya Raghunath; Fabien Maldonado; Srinivasan Rajagopalan; Ronald A Karwoski; Zackary S DePew; Brian J Bartholmai; Tobias Peikert; Richard A Robb
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  A 3-D Riesz-Covariance Texture Model for Prediction of Nodule Recurrence in Lung CT.

Authors:  Pol Cirujeda; Yashin Dicente Cid; Henning Muller; Daniel Rubin; Todd A Aguilera; Billy W Loo; Maximilian Diehn; Xavier Binefa; Adrien Depeursinge
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  A rank-based sample size method for multiple outcomes in clinical trials.

Authors:  Peng Huang; Robert F Woolson; Peter C O'Brien
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination.

Authors:  David S Gierada; Paul Pinsky; Hrudaya Nath; Caroline Chiles; Fenghai Duan; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  37 in total

1.  Content-based image retrieval for Lung Nodule Classification Using Texture Features and Learned Distance Metric.

Authors:  Guohui Wei; Hui Cao; He Ma; Shouliang Qi; Wei Qian; Zhiqing Ma
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Current perspectives for the size measurement of screening-detected lung nodules.

Authors:  Hyungjin Kim; Chang Min Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Lung cancer screening: tell me more about post-test risk.

Authors:  Mario Silva; Gianluca Milanese; Ugo Pastorino; Nicola Sverzellati
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Machine learning approach for distinguishing malignant and benign lung nodules utilizing standardized perinodular parenchymal features from CT.

Authors:  Johanna Uthoff; Matthew J Stephens; John D Newell; Eric A Hoffman; Jared Larson; Nicholas Koehn; Frank A De Stefano; Chrissy M Lusk; Angela S Wenzlaff; Donovan Watza; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Laurie L Carr; David A Lynch; Ann G Schwartz; Jessica C Sieren
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Quantification of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease with Radiomics-based CT Scores.

Authors:  Guillaume Chassagnon; Evangelia I Zacharaki; Sébastien Bommart; Pierre-Régis Burgel; Raphael Chiron; Séverine Dangeard; Nikos Paragios; Clémence Martin; Marie-Pierre Revel
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-12-17

6.  Prediction of lung cancer risk at follow-up screening with low-dose CT: a training and validation study of a deep learning method.

Authors:  Peng Huang; Cheng T Lin; Yuliang Li; Martin C Tammemagi; Malcolm V Brock; Sukhinder Atkar-Khattra; Yanxun Xu; Ping Hu; John R Mayo; Heidi Schmidt; Michel Gingras; Sergio Pasian; Lori Stewart; Scott Tsai; Jean M Seely; Daria Manos; Paul Burrowes; Rick Bhatia; Ming-Sound Tsao; Stephen Lam
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2019-10-17

7.  Differentiation of non-small cell lung cancer and histoplasmosis pulmonary nodules: insights from radiomics model performance compared with clinician observers.

Authors:  Johanna Uthoff; Prashant Nagpal; Rolando Sanchez; Thomas J Gross; Changhyun Lee; Jessica C Sieren
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

8.  Validation of the BRODERS classifier (Benign versus aggRessive nODule Evaluation using Radiomic Stratification), a novel HRCT-based radiomic classifier for indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Fabien Maldonado; Cyril Varghese; Srinivasan Rajagopalan; Fenghai Duan; Aneri B Balar; Dhairya A Lakhani; Sanja L Antic; Pierre P Massion; Tucker F Johnson; Ronald A Karwoski; Richard A Robb; Brian J Bartholmai; Tobias Peikert
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  The multidisciplinary team plays an important role in the prediction of small solitary pulmonary nodules: a propensity-score-matching study.

Authors:  Chaoyuan Liu; Lishu Zhao; Fang Wu; Yeqian Feng; Rong Jiang; Chunhong Hu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

10.  Assessing the predictive accuracy of lung cancer, metastases, and benign lesions using an artificial intelligence-driven computer aided diagnosis system.

Authors:  Kunwei Li; Kunfeng Liu; Yinghua Zhong; Mingzhu Liang; Peixin Qin; Haijun Li; Rongguo Zhang; Shaolin Li; Xueguo Liu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.