Literature DB >> 28871360

The AES total ankle arthroplasty analysis of failures and survivorship at ten years.

Alexandre Di Iorio1,2, Anthony Viste3,4, Michel Henry Fessy3,4, Jean Luc Besse3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: AES mobile-bearing total ankle replacement was developed from the Buechel Pappas model. It was withdrawn in 2009, after identification of a higher than expected complication rate. The purpose of the current study was to analyse clinical outcomes, failures and survival of the initial series of 50 AES published in 2009.
METHODS: In this single-centre continuous prospective study (2003-2006), 50 AES prostheses were included. Pre-operative osteoarthritis was mainly post-traumatic (50%) and secondary to instability (36%). All patients were assessed with clinical and radiographic follow-up at six months, one year, two years and every two to three years thereafter. A CT-scan was systematically performed before procedure, and at two years, five years and ten years. At last follow-up, all patients with TAR had a functional (SF 36, AOFAS) and clinical assessment. All complications or surgical events were analysed.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was ten ± two years (range, 9-13). The mean AOFAS score was 75 points (range, 26-100). The mean SF 36 score was 69 points (range, 35-97). There was a significant deterioration in AOFAS score at five years and at last follow-up (p < 0.05). Fifteen TARs underwent reoperation for cyst curettage-graft because of development of periprosthetic lesions. Six of them ended up with prosthesis removal-arthrodesis. At the last follow-up, 14 TARs were removed for arthrodesis. Of the 30 prostheses seen at last follow-up, four are awaiting prosthesis removal-arthrodesis and one for cyst curettage-graft. The ten year survivorships free of any prosthesis removal or arthrodesis and free of any reoperation were 68% (95% CI, 55-85) and 57% (95% CI, 44-74), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggested a high rate of reoperation. Overall ten year survival was lower than with other designs, particularly due to cyst lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective case series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone cysts; Revision; Survivorship; Total ankle replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28871360     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3605-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  36 in total

1.  High rate of osteolytic lesions in medium-term followup after the AES total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Ari Kokkonen; Mikko Ikävalko; Raine Tiihonen; Hannu Kautiainen; Eero A Belt
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  STAR™ ankle: long-term results.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Mann; Roger A Mann; Eric Horton
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  AKILE™ total ankle arthroplasty: Clinical and CT scan analysis of periprosthetic cysts.

Authors:  J Lucas y Hernandez; O Laffenêtre; E Toullec; V Darcel; D Chauveaux
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 4.  Ankle arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher Gross; Brandon J Erickson; Samuel B Adams; Selene G Parekh
Journal:  Foot Ankle Spec       Date:  2015-01-05

5.  Salvage of failed total ankle replacement using tantalum trabecular metal: case series.

Authors:  Bernard H Sagherian; Richard J Claridge
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR).

Authors:  Hakon Kofoed
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Arthrodesis for failed ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  H B Kitaoka; D W Romness
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Jesse E Templeton; Steve S Liu; Douglas R Pedersen; Devon D Goetz; Patrick M Sullivan; Richard C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Comparison of quality of life following total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: Retrospective study of 54 cases.

Authors:  F Dalat; F Trouillet; M H Fessy; M Bourdin; J-L Besse
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 2.256

10.  Poor prosthesis survival and function after component exchange of total ankle prostheses.

Authors:  Ilka Kamrad; Anders Henricsson; Magnus K Karlsson; Håkan Magnusson; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Åke Carlsson; Björn E Rosengren
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  3 in total

1.  Citations, non-citations and visibility of International Orthopaedics in 2017.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Andrew Quaile; Marko Pećina; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Total ankle replacement: is pre-operative varus deformity a predictor of poor survival rate and clinical and radiological outcomes?

Authors:  Federico Giuseppe Usuelli; Claudia Angela Di Silvestri; Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Annalisa Orenti; Filippo Randelli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Long-term follow-up of Bologna-Oxford (BOX) total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alberto Bianchi; Nicolò Martinelli; Eleonora Caboni; Giorgio Raggi; Francesca Manfroni; Valerio Sansone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.075

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.