Literature DB >> 28871334

Role of percutaneous veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as bridge to left ventricular assist device.

Koichi Toda1,2, Tomoyuki Fujita3, Osamu Seguchi4, Masanobu Yanase4, Takeshi Nakatani4.   

Abstract

Percutaneous veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides emergency circulatory support for cardiogenic shock patients and is used as a bridge to a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for LVAD implantation in patients who required percutaneous VA-ECMO as a bridge to long-term LVAD. We retrospectively investigated 32 consecutive LVAD patients who required percutaneous VA-ECMO as a bridge to long-term LVAD. Twenty-nine patients (91%) were intubated, and their serum creatinine and total bilirubin levels before LVAD implantation were 2.1 ± 2.0 and 3.7 ± 3.7 mg/dl, respectively. Patients were supported by LVAD for 495 ± 393 days, during which 15 died, 6 recovered native cardiac functions and LVAD was explanted, and 11 underwent heart transplantation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDd) ≤54 mm was a significant predictor of 90-day mortality after LVAD implantation (OR 13.64; 95% CI 1.081-172.0; p = 0.0433) and freedom from death during LVAD support was significantly worse in patients with an LVDd ≤54 mm. Furthermore, preoperative LVDd was positively correlated with postoperative right ventricular stroke work index (r = 0.739, p < 0.0001) and patients with an LVDd ≤54 mm had significantly worse postoperative right ventricular, renal, and hepatic functions. We demonstrated that percutaneous VA-ECMO could be utilized as a bridge to long-term LVAD in selected patients. Our results suggest that preoperative LVDd is a useful predictor of mortality and right ventricular function after LVAD implantation in patients requiring VA-ECMO, in whom assessment of right ventricular function is challenging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Heart failure; Ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28871334     DOI: 10.1007/s10047-017-0984-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Artif Organs        ISSN: 1434-7229            Impact factor:   1.731


  23 in total

1.  Extracorporeal life support to left ventricular assist device bridge to heart transplant: A strategy to optimize survival and resource utilization.

Authors:  F D Pagani; W Lynch; F Swaniker; D B Dyke; R Bartlett; T Koelling; M Moscucci; G M Deeb; S Bolling; H Monaghan; K D Aaronson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Usefulness of two-dimensional echocardiographic parameters of the left side of the heart to predict right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Tomoko Sugiyama Kato; Maryjane Farr; Paul Christian Schulze; Mathew Maurer; Khurram Shahzad; Shinichi Iwata; Shunichi Homma; Ulrich Jorde; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Linda Gillam; Donna Mancini
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Third INTERMACS Annual Report: the evolution of destination therapy in the United States.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; Marissa A Miller; Karen L Ulisney; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  One hundred patients with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device: evolving concepts and technology.

Authors:  P M McCarthy; N O Smedira; R L Vargo; M Goormastic; R E Hobbs; R C Starling; J B Young
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Experience with more than 100 total artificial heart implants.

Authors:  Jack G Copeland; Hannah Copeland; Monica Gustafson; Nicole Mineburg; Diane Covington; Richard G Smith; Mark Friedman
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Impact of preoperative percutaneous cardiopulmonary support on outcome following left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Koichi Toda; Tomoyuki Fujita; Junjiro Kobayashi; Yusuke Shimahara; Soichiro Kitamura; Osamu Seguchi; Yoshihiro Murata; Masanobu Yanase; Takeshi Nakatani
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 2.993

7.  Echocardiographic predictors of adverse outcomes after continuous left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Yan Topilsky; Jae K Oh; Dipesh K Shah; Barry A Boilson; John A Schirger; Sudhir S Kushwaha; Naveen L Pereira; Soon J Park
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-03

8.  Age and preoperative total bilirubin level can stratify prognosis after extracorporeal pulsatile left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Taro Shiga; Koichiro Kinugawa; Masaru Hatano; Atsushi Yao; Takashi Nishimura; Miyoko Endo; Naoko Kato; Yasunobu Hirata; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono; Ryozo Nagai
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.993

9.  Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using Levitronix centrifugal pump as bridge to decision for refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Claudio F Russo; Aldo Cannata; Marco Lanfranconi; Giuseppe Bruschi; Filippo Milazzo; Roberto Paino; Luigi Martinelli
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Predictors of severe right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion: analysis of 245 patients.

Authors:  Yoshie Ochiai; Patrick M McCarthy; Nicholas G Smedira; Michael K Banbury; Jose L Navia; Jingyuan Feng; Amy P Hsu; Michael L Yeager; Tiffany Buda; Katherine J Hoercher; Michael W Howard; Masami Takagaki; Kazuyoshi Doi; Kiyotaka Fukamachi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-09-24       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Artificial Organs 2018: the year in review : Journal of Artificial Organs Editorial Committee.

Authors:  Y Sawa; G Matsumiya; K Matsuda; E Tatsumi; T Abe; K Fukunaga; S Ichiba; T Taguchi; K Kokubo; T Masuzawa; A Myoui; M Nishimura; T Nishimura; T Nishinaka; E Okamoto; S Tokunaga; T Tomo; T Tsukiya; Y Yagi; T Yamaoka
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Predictors of mortality following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in an unselected, critically ill patient population.

Authors:  István Ferenc Édes; Balázs Tamás Németh; István Hartyánszky; Bálint Szilveszter; Péter Kulyassa; Levente Fazekas; Miklós Pólos; Endre Németh; Dávid Becker; Béla Merkely
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 1.426

3.  Incremental cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal membranous oxygenation as a bridge to cardiac transplant or left ventricular assist device placement in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Joseph Reza; Ashley Mila; Bradford Ledzian; Jingwei Sun; Scott Silvestry
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-07-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.