Literature DB >> 9576228

One hundred patients with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device: evolving concepts and technology.

P M McCarthy1, N O Smedira, R L Vargo, M Goormastic, R E Hobbs, R C Starling, J B Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implantable left ventricular assist devices are common as a bridge to transplantation but are just reaching their goal as an alternative to transplantation.
METHODS: From December 1991 until December 1996, 97 left ventricular assist devices were implanted as a bridge to transplantation, one as an alternative to transplantation, and two as a bridge to recovery. Included were 64 pneumatic devices and 36 electric devices. Most patients (69%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy and most (53%) had had previous cardiac surgery. Preoperative circulatory support (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) was used in 25.
RESULTS: Perioperative insertion of a right ventricular assist device was unusual (11%). The mean duration of support with a left ventricular assist device (bridge to transplantation) was 70 +/- 41 days (up to 206 days). Survival to transplantation was 76%. Cause of death included multiple organ failure (n = 13), perioperative stroke (n = 5), device failure (n = 5), and controller disconnect (n = 1). Significant risk factors for death included (1) preoperative need for ventilator or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, (2) elevated blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, or bilirubin, and (3) low pulmonary artery pressures. Risks after insertion of the left ventricular assist device were reoperation for bleeding, support with a right ventricular assist device, dialysis, or device failure. Catastrophic failure of the device occurred 14 times in 12 patients and was treated by emergency pump exchange in six instances. Only two device-related thromboembolic episodes were detected. Positive blood cultures were found in 59% of patients, driveline infection in 28%, and pump infection in 11%.
CONCLUSIONS: The HeartMate device provided excellent hemodynamic support with low device-related thromboembolic events. Infection and reliability of the device contributed to the high cost of therapy. These areas need to be improved for the left ventricular assist device to attain its goal as a viable alternative to transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9576228     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70373-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  30 in total

Review 1.  Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: towards evidence based medical practice.

Authors:  S G Williams; D J Wright; L B Tan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Compact, reliable ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery or for semipermanent use.

Authors:  K Nishimura; S Kono; T Nishina; K Ueyama; A Ikai; T Ikeda; C Nojiri; T Akamatsu; M Komeda
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-11

Review 3.  Management issues for patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure.

Authors:  Andrew D Feingold; David DeNofrio
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Survival benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in left ventricular assist device-supported heart failure patients.

Authors:  Marwan M Refaat; Toshikazu Tanaka; Robert L Kormos; Dennis McNamara; Jeffrey Teuteberg; Steve Winowich; Barry London; Marc A Simon
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Development of a small implantable right ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Kiyotaka Fukamachi; David J Horvath; Alex L Massiello; Yoshio Ootaki; Keiji Kamohara; Masatoshi Akiyama; Firas Zahr; Michael W Kopcak; Raymond Dessoffy; Ji-Feng Chen; Stephen Benefit; Leonard A R Golding
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Importance of luxury flow for critically ill patients receiving a left ventricular assist system.

Authors:  Motonobu Nishimura; Takashi Nishimura; Masayuki Ishikawa; Ayumu Masuoka; Nobuyuki Okamura; Keiko Abe; Takahiro Matsuoka; Mika Iwazaki; Kazuhito Imanaka; Haruhiko Asano; Shunei Kyo
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 1.731

7.  Left ventricular assist system through the left ventricle for acute myocardial infarction: report of a case.

Authors:  Hiroki Hata; Goro Matsumiya; Yoshiki Sawa; Norihide Fukushima; Osamu Monta; Hikaru Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Left ventricular remodeling and myocardial recovery on mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Marc A Simon; Brian A Primack; Jeffrey Teuteberg; Robert L Kormos; Christian Bermudez; Yoshiya Toyoda; Hemal Shah; John Gorcsan; Dennis M McNamara
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.712

9.  Acute kidney injury and mortality following ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Abhijit Naik; Shahab A Akhter; Savitri Fedson; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Jonathan D Rich; Jay L Koyner
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.754

10.  Left ventricular assist devices: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2004-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.