Literature DB >> 28869117

Microfludic platforms for the evaluation of anti-platelet agent efficacy under hyper-shear conditions associated with ventricular assist devices.

Annalisa Dimasi1, Marco Rasponi2, Filippo Consolo3, Gianfranco B Fiore2, Danny Bluestein4, Marvin J Slepian5, Alberto Redaelli2.   

Abstract

Thrombus formation is a major adverse event affecting patients implanted with ventricular assist devices (VADs). Despite anti-thrombotic drug administration, thrombotic events remain frequent within the first year post-implantation. Platelet activation (PA) is an essential process underling thrombotic adverse events in VAD systems. Indeed, abnormal shear forces, correlating with specific flow trajectories of VADs, are strong agonists mediating PA. To date, the ability to determine efficacy of anti-platelet (AP) agents under shear stress conditions is limited. Here, we present a novel microfluidic platform designed to replicate shear stress patterns of a clinical VAD, and use it to compare the efficacy of two AP agents in vitro. Gel-filtered platelets were incubated with i) acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ii) ticagrelor, at two different concentrations (ASA: 125 and 250 µM; ticagrelor: 250 and 500 nM) and were circulated in the VAD-emulating microfluidic platform using a peristaltic pump. GFP was collected after 4 and 52 repetitions of exposure to the VAD shear pattern and tested for shear-mediated PA. ASA significantly inhibited PA only at 2-fold higher concentration (250 µM) than therapeutic dose (125 µM). The effect of ticagrelor was not dependent on drug concentration, and did not show significant inhibition with respect to untreated control. This study demonstrates the potential use of microfluidic platforms as means of testing platelet responsiveness and AP drug efficacy under complex and realistic VAD-like shear stress conditions.
Copyright © 2017 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-platelet agents; Drug efficacy; Mechanical circulatory support devices; Microfluidic flow-based assays; Platelet activation; Shear stress; Shear-mediated platelet activation; Ventricular assist devices

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28869117      PMCID: PMC5610105          DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  56 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacodynamic properties of antiplatelet agents: current knowledge and future perspectives.

Authors:  Kallirroi I Kalantzi; Maria E Tsoumani; Ioannis A Goudevenos; Alexandros D Tselepis
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.045

2.  Platelet activation patterns in platelet size sub-populations: differential responses to aspirin in vitro.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar R Mangalpally; Alan Siqueiros-Garcia; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Jing-Fei Dong; Neal S Kleiman; Sasidhar Guthikonda
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Sixth INTERMACS annual report: a 10,000-patient database.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Francis D Pagani; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Elizabeth D Blume; Marissa A Miller; J T Baldwin; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  Microfluidic impedance cytometer for platelet analysis.

Authors:  Mikael Evander; Antonio J Ricco; John Morser; Gregory T A Kovacs; Lawrence L K Leung; Laurent Giovangrandi
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 5.  Mechanisms of bleeding and approach to patients with axial-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Jorge Suarez; Chetan B Patel; G Michael Felker; Richard Becker; Adrian F Hernandez; Joseph G Rogers
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 8.790

6.  Shear induces a unique series of morphological changes in translocating platelets: effects of morphology on translocation dynamics.

Authors:  Mhairi J Maxwell; Sacha M Dopheide; Samantha J Turner; Shaun P Jackson
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 8.311

7.  Evaluation of shear-induced platelet activation models under constant and dynamic shear stress loading conditions relevant to devices.

Authors:  Jawaad Sheriff; João Silva Soares; Michalis Xenos; Jolyon Jesty; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 8.  Platelet adhesion under flow.

Authors:  Zaverio M Ruggeri
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Device thrombogenicity emulation: a novel method for optimizing mechanical circulatory support device thromboresistance.

Authors:  Gaurav Girdhar; Michalis Xenos; Yared Alemu; Wei-Che Chiu; Bryan E Lynch; Jolyon Jesty; Shmuel Einav; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Recurrent Early Thrombus Formation in HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Massimo Capoccia; Christopher T Bowles; Anton Sabashnikov; Andre Simon
Journal:  J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep       Date:  2013-05-20
View more
  3 in total

1.  Microfluidic flow-based platforms for induction and analysis of dynamic shear-mediated platelet activation-Initial validation versus the standardized hemodynamic shearing device.

Authors:  Annalisa Dimasi; Yana Roka-Moiia; Filippo Consolo; Marco Rasponi; Gianfranco B Fiore; Marvin J Slepian; Alberto Redaelli
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Prothrombotic activity of cytokine-activated endothelial cells and shear-activated platelets in the setting of ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Alice Apostoli; Valentina Bianchi; Nina Bono; Annalisa Dimasi; Kaitlyn R Ammann; Yana Roka Moiia; Andrea Montisci; Jawaad Sheriff; Danny Bluestein; Gianfranco B Fiore; Federico Pappalardo; Gabriele Candiani; Alberto Redaelli; Marvin J Slepian; Filippo Consolo
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Cell Damage Index as Computational Indicator for Blood Cell Activation and Damage.

Authors:  Markus Gusenbauer; Renáta Tóthová; Giulia Mazza; Martin Brandl; Thomas Schrefl; Iveta Jančigová; Ivan Cimrák
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.094

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.