| Literature DB >> 28866820 |
W Podwika1, K Kleszcz2, M Krośniak3, P Zagrodzki3.
Abstract
Concentrations of selected metals (Cu, Mn, Zn, Cd) in tea leaves were investigated. Samples included black, green, and other (red, white, yellow, and oolong) teas. They were purchased on a local market but they covered different countries of origin. Beverages like yerba mate, rooibos, and fruit teas were also included in the discussion. Metal determinations were performed using atomic absorption spectrometry. In black teas, Mn/Cd ratio was found to be significantly higher (48,091 ± 35,436) vs. green (21,319 ± 16,396) or other teas (15,692 ± 8393), while Cd concentration was lower (31.4 ± 18.3 μg/kg) vs. other teas 67.0 (67.0 ± 24.4). Moreover, Zn/Cu and Cu/Cd ratios were, respectively, lower (1.1 ± 0.2 vs. 2.2 ± 0.5) and higher (1086 ± 978 vs. 261 ± 128) when comparing black teas with other teas. Intake of each metal from drinking tea was estimated based on the extraction levels reported by other authors. Contributions to recommended daily intake for Cu, Mn, and Zn were estimated based on the recommendations of international authorities. Except for manganese, tea is not a major dietary source of the studied elements. From the total number of 27 samples, three have shown exceeded cadmium level, according to local regulations.Entities:
Keywords: AAS; Cadmium; Copper; Manganese; Tea; Zinc
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28866820 PMCID: PMC5938311 DOI: 10.1007/s12011-017-1140-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res ISSN: 0163-4984 Impact factor: 3.738
Details of samples’ characteristics
| Sample no. | Type of tea | Form | Country of origin | Brand name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Green | Loose leaves | China | Dynasty |
| 2 | Sri Lanka | Sencha | ||
| 3 | India | Assam OP | ||
| 4 | Indonesia | Green Hills, Gunpowder Pearl | ||
| 5 | Japan | Sencha | ||
| 6 | Tea bags | China | Oscar, Green Tea Bags, Yunnan | |
| 7 | Sri Lanka | Dilmah, Pure Green | ||
| 8 | Vietnam/China | Packers Best | ||
| 9 | Black | Loose leaves | China | Golden Dynasty |
| 10 | Sri Lanka | Dimbula Uduwela | ||
| 11 | India | Hattialli | ||
| 12 | Vietnam | Vietnam | ||
| 13 | Kenya | Green Hills, Kenya Pearl | ||
| 14 | No data | Lipton | ||
| 15 | Tea bags | Sri Lanka | Jones Classic | |
| 16 | Kenya | Loyd, Black Sense, Kenya | ||
| 17 | Argentina, Iran, Indonesia (mix) | Ulubiona | ||
| 18 | No data | Assuan | ||
| 19 | No data | Assam, Teekane | ||
| 20 | No data | Minutka | ||
| 21 | White | Loose leaves | China | Pai Mu Tan |
| 22 | China | Shou Mei | ||
| 23 | Red | Loose leaves | China | Pu-erh |
| 24 | Tea bags | China | Pu-erh | |
| 25 | oolong | Loose leaves | Taiwan | Formosa |
| 26 | China | Tie Guan Yin Wangjia | ||
| 27 | Yellow | Loose leaves | China | Yellow Tea |
Results for Certified Reference Materials
| CRM | Element | Measured value [mg/kg] | Certified value [mg/kg] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | Mn | 701 ± 15 | 700 ± 25 |
| Sample 2 | 716 ± 8 | ||
| Sample 1 | Zn | 32.3 ± 0.2 | 33 ± 3 |
| Sample 2 | 31.2 ± 0.7 | ||
| Sample 1 | Cd | 0.033 ± 0.001 | 0.030 ± 0.003 |
| Sample 2 | 0.030 ± 0.001 | ||
| Sample 1 | Cu | 6.8 ± 0.2 | 7.0 ± 0.3 |
| Sample 2 | 6.9 ± 0.4 |
Concentration of the studied metals in tea samples
| Sample no. | Cu [mg/kg] | RSD [%] | Mn [mg/kg] | RSD [%] | Zn [mg/kg] | RSD [%] | Cd [μg/kg] | RSD [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.7 | 1.0 | 593 | 1.8 | 21.3 | 5.2 | 37 | 14 |
| 2 | 15.1 | 2.2 | 746 | 1.2 | 25.2 | 0.2 | 64.3 | 1.6 |
| 3 | 18.0 | 1.8 | 607 | 1.1 | 25.2 | 0.5 | 44.4 | 2.3 |
| 4 | 26.6 | 1.8 | 457 | 0.80 | 18.8 | 1.2 | 14 | 14 |
| 5 | 12.1 | 4.3 | 900 | 2.4 | 12.6 | 1.4 | 15.7 | 1.6 |
| 6 | 22.6 | 0.4 | 582 | 1.6 | 28.7 | 1.8 | 28.2 | 4.3 |
| 7 | 16.8 | 2.2 | 1590 | 1.7 | 23.4 | 0.7 | 129 | 0.07 |
| 8 | 11.8 | 0.5 | 1035 | 1.5 | 17.8 | 2.4 | 153 | 5.3 |
| 9 | 25.0 | 1.8 | 1080 | 2.8 | 29.1 | 0.7 | 34.7 | 1.9 |
| 10 | 19.1 | 0.6 | 717 | 0.42 | 13.3 | 0.5 | 6.0 | 13 |
| 11 | 32.7 | 1.2 | 626 | 2.2 | 26.5 | 0.5 | 26.3 | 3.6 |
| 12 | 17.3 | 0.1 | 1180 | 1.7 | 21.1 | 2.4 | 42.0 | 0.05 |
| 13 | 31.0 | 1.2 | 2210 | 1.6 | 25.9 | 0.8 | 64.3 | 7.0 |
| 14 | 22.5 | 1.8 | 831 | 1.9 | 27.0 | 1.7 | 35.6 | 1.5 |
| 15 | 30.9 | 1.0 | 561 | 4.1 | 26.3 | 0.2 | 13.0 | 12 |
| 16 | 14.1 | 6.0 | 1020 | 2.0 | 20.0 | 1.8 | 34.5 | 8.8 |
| 17 | 16.4 | 5.5 | 1290 | 2.6 | 17.9 | 4.1 | 59.9 | 3.5 |
| 18 | 16.7 | 4.5 | 1620 | 2.3 | 14.7 | 5.8 | 28.8 | 5.6 |
| 19 | 14.9 | 4.5 | 876 | 2.5 | 20.4 | 0.7 | 7.9 | 5.6 |
| 20 | 15.2 | 2.1 | 1130 | 2.0 | 19.9 | 1.7 | 24.0 | 0.14 |
| 21 | 15.4 | 1.3 | 1036 | 1.1 | 34.2 | 0.3 | 47.3 | 7.1 |
| 22 | 15.6 | 7.0 | 1100 | 2.5 | 25.0 | 2.5 | 35.6 | 9.1 |
| 23 | 22.7 | 2.1 | 990 | 2.8 | 31.8 | 3.7 | 58.5 | 5.8 |
| 24 | 21.7 | 4.7 | 730 | 3.1 | 45.5 | 0.3 | 106 | 0.51 |
| 25 | 9.2 | 5.3 | 949 | 3.4 | 22.0 | 0.6 | 89.7 | 1.9 |
| 26 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 986 | 1.5 | 23.4 | 0.8 | 71.6 | 2.6 |
| 27 | 14.6 | 7.6 | 541 | 1.1 | 42.4 | 0.8 | 60.4 | 1.2 |
Descriptive statistics for studied parameters in the samples; mean values with the same letter in upper index differ significantly
| Parameter | Mean | Median | Min | Max | SD | Kurtosis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black teas | |||||||
| Mn (mg/kg) | 12 | 1094.1 | 1047.9 | 561.2 | 2209.7 | 460.5 | 2.210 |
| Zn (mg/kg) | 12 | 21.8 | 20.8 | 13.3 | 29.1 | 5.1 | − 1.061 |
| Cd (μg/kg) | 12 | 31.4a | 31.7 | 5.5 | 64.3 | 18.3 | − 0.223 |
| Cu (mg/kg) | 12 | 21.3 | 18.2 | 14.1 | 32.7 | 6.9 | − 1.203 |
| Mn/Zn | 12 | 53.3 | 52.3 | 21.3 | 109.7 | 25.9 | 0.691 |
| Mn/Cd | 12 | 48091b,c | 32747 | 21532 | 129907 | 35436 | 2.116 |
| Mn/Cu | 12 | 56.2 | 63.5 | 18.1 | 96.8 | 24.9 | − 0.950 |
| Zn/Cd | 12 | 1095 | 794 | 298 | 3022 | 882 | 0.758 |
| Zn/Cu | 12 | 1.1d | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.2 | − 1.546 |
| Cu/Cd | 12 | 1086e | 633 | 274 | 3453 | 978 | 2.046 |
| Green teas | |||||||
| Mn (mg/kg) | 8 | 814.3 | 676.5 | 457 | 1593.6 | 366.7 | 2.587 |
| Zn (mg/kg) | 8 | 21.6 | 22.3 | 12.6 | 28.7 | 5.1 | 0.021 |
| Cd (μg/kg) | 8 | 60.7 | 40.8 | 14.1 | 153 | 52.4 | − 0.166 |
| Cu (mg/kg) | 8 | 17.5 | 16.8 | 11.8 | 26.6 | 5.0 | 0.183 |
| Mn/Zn | 8 | 40.5 | 28.8 | 20.3 | 71.3 | 21.5 | − 1.807 |
| Mn/Cd | 8 | 21319b | 14821 | 6767 | 57174 | 16396 | 3.318 |
| Mn/Cu | 8 | 52.3 | 42.5 | 17.2 | 94.6 | 29.6 | − 1.641 |
| Zn/Cd | 8 | 650 | 567 | 116 | 1335 | 435 | − 1.165 |
| Zn/Cu | 8 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 1.235 |
| Cu/Cd | 8 | 594 | 428 | 77 | 1885 | 587 | 3.557 |
| Other teas | |||||||
| Mn (mg/kg) | 7 | 903.9 | 985.6 | 541.2 | 1096.7 | 196.9 | 0.815 |
| Zn (mg/kg) | 7 | 32.1 | 31.8 | 22.0 | 45.5 | 9.3 | − 1.476 |
| Cd (μg/kg) | 7 | 67.0a | 60.4 | 35.6 | 106 | 24.4 | − 0.427 |
| Cu (mg/kg) | 7 | 15.5 | 15.4 | 9.1 | 22.7 | 5.4 | − 1.166 |
| Mn/Zn | 7 | 31.3 | 31.2 | 12.8 | 43.8 | 12.8 | − 1.449 |
| Mn/Cd | 7 | 15692c | 13768 | 6865 | 30836 | 8393 | 0.517 |
| Mn/Cu | 7 | 66.2 | 67.2 | 33.6 | 108.2 | 30.5 | − 1.563 |
| Zn/Cd | 7 | 525 | 543 | 246 | 723 | 196 | − 1.815 |
| Zn/Cu | 7 | 2.2d | 2.2 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 0.5 | − 0.737 |
| Cu/Cd | 7 | 261e | 242 | 103 | 438 | 128 | − 1.543 |
ap < 0.05; bp < 0.05; cp < 0.01; dp < 0.001; ep < 0.01
Comparison of results of this work with reported by other authors
| This work | Street et al. (2006)a | Narin et al. (2004) | Ashraf and Mian (2008) | Srividhya et al. (2011) | Gajewska et al. (2000) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green tea (mean ± SD) | Number of samples | 8 | 13 | – | – | 1 | 14 |
| Mn [mg/kg] | 814 ± 367 | 1092 ± 440 | – | – | 508 ± 44 | 663 ± 168 | |
| Cu [mg/kg] | 17.5 ± 5.0 | 23.6 ± 5.8 | – | – | 11.28 ± 0.08 | 20.0 ± 5.9 | |
| Zn [mg/kg] | 21.6 ± 5.1 | 47.2 ± 15.8 | – | – | 26.39 ± 0.92 | 45.7 ± 16.1 | |
| Cd [μg/kg] | 60.3 ± 52.8 | – | – | – | 1.59 ± 0.26 | 218 ± 43b | |
| Black tea (mean ± SD) | Number of samples | 12 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 1 | 6 |
| Mn [mg/kg] | 1094 ± 460 | 972 ± 448 | 788 ± 152 | 751 ± 185 | 709 ± 14 | 718 ± 232 | |
| Cu [mg/kg] | 21.3 ± 6.9 | 29.9 ± 13.0 | 16.5 ± 3.9 | 18.1 ± 6.9 | 14.34 ± 0.49 | 31.3 ± 11.2 | |
| Zn [mg/kg] | 21.8 ± 5.1 | 44.6 ± 12.9 | 129 ± 13 | 65.7 ± 31.3 | 25.39 ± 0.59 | 52.6 ± 16.8 | |
| Cd [μg/kg] | 31.3 ± 18.4 | – | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 0.89 ± 0.10 | 426 ± 506b |
aIn this publication, results were given for each sample individually; means and SD were calculated by the authors of this work for the purpose of comparison
bFor Cd, the number of samples was 20
Estimated intakes of the elements from tea compared to recommendations
| Element | Extraction degree [%] | Calculated daily intake [mg/day] | Reference daily intake [mg/day] [ | Population reference intake [mg/day] [ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |||
| Black tea | ||||||
| Mn | 28.9 | 1.42 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1–10 | 1–10 |
| Zn | 32.5 | 0.032 | 11 | 8 | 9.5 | 7 |
| Cu | 22.7 | 0.022 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Green tea | ||||||
| Mn | 30.6 | 1.12 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1–10 | 1–10 |
| Zn | 36.1 | 0.035 | 11 | 8 | 9.5 | 7 |
| Cu | 22.6 | 0.017 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 |