Literature DB >> 28861656

An opportune and unique research to evaluate the public health impact of electronic cigarettes.

Ahmad Besaratinia1, Stella Tommasi2.   

Abstract

In response to the growing public health concern regarding the risks or benefits of electronic cigarettes (e-cig) use relative to smoking, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) has recently introduced the first standardized- and well- characterized e-cig device to the research community (see, https://www.drugabuse.gov/funding/supplemental-information-nida-e-cig ). E-cig are promoted as safe alternatives to conventional tobacco cigarettes and/or as aides to smoking cessation. E-cig are highly popular among cigarette smokers who are unable/unwilling to quit but are willing to switch to putatively less-harmful tobacco substitutes. E-cig are also becoming increasingly popular among youth who have never experimented with combustible cigarettes. However, chemical analyses of e-cig juices (both in liquid form and after being heated into vapor) have shown that many carcinogens present in cigarette smoke are also found in a range of e-cig products. To date, the cancer-causing potential of e-cig has not been investigated in e-cig users (i.e., vapers). Use of e-cig without a prior history of smoking is currently a rare phenomenon in adults, but is increasingly common among youth. Consequently, investigating the carcinogenic potential of e-cig in nonsmoking youth provides a unique opportunity to verify the health impact of e-cig use, without the confounding effects of cigarette smoking. Within this context, the availability of the NIDA Standard Research e-cig offers a unique research opportunity with tremendous public health implications. Comparing and contrasting the cancer-causing potentials of standard vaping and smoking in youth will help determine the health risks or benefits of e-cig use relative to cigarette smoking. This information will be instrumental in making scientifically based decisions on the development and evaluation of policies and regulations on e-cig manufacture, marketing, and distribution. Ultimately, evidence-based guidelines and legislations on e-cig will help reduce the burden of tobacco-related diseases, particularly on minors and vulnerable populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Electronic cigarettes; Public health smoking; Risk; Vaping

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28861656      PMCID: PMC5693655          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-017-0952-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  28 in total

1.  Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher Bullen; Colin Howe; Murray Laugesen; Hayden McRobbie; Varsha Parag; Jonathan Williman; Natalie Walker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs): views of aficionados and clinical/public health perspectives.

Authors:  J Foulds; S Veldheer; A Berg
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Electronic cigarettes: the road ahead.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia; Stella Tommasi
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  "Direct Dripping": A High-Temperature, High-Formaldehyde Emission Electronic Cigarette Use Method.

Authors:  Soha Talih; Zainab Balhas; Rola Salman; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Alan Shihadeh
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 5.  Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression.

Authors:  Andrew P Feinberg; Michael A Koldobskiy; Anita Göndör
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes.

Authors:  Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Jakub Knysak; Michal Gawron; Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak; Jolanta Kurek; Adam Prokopowicz; Magdalena Jablonska-Czapla; Czeslawa Rosik-Dulewska; Christopher Havel; Peyton Jacob; Neal Benowitz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students--United States, 2011-2015.

Authors:  Tushar Singh; René A Arrazola; Catherine G Corey; Corinne G Husten; Linda J Neff; David M Homa; Brian A King
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as tobacco cigarettes substitute: a prospective 12-month randomized control design study.

Authors:  Pasquale Caponnetto; Davide Campagna; Fabio Cibella; Jaymin B Morjaria; Massimo Caruso; Cristina Russo; Riccardo Polosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students - United States, 2011-2016.

Authors:  Ahmed Jamal; Andrea Gentzke; S Sean Hu; Karen A Cullen; Benjamin J Apelberg; David M Homa; Brian A King
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Metal and silicate particles including nanoparticles are present in electronic cigarette cartomizer fluid and aerosol.

Authors:  Monique Williams; Amanda Villarreal; Krassimir Bozhilov; Sabrina Lin; Prue Talbot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Vaping epidemic: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia; Stella Tommasi
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Hypomethylation of LINE-1 repeat elements and global loss of DNA hydroxymethylation in vapers and smokers.

Authors:  Andrew W Caliri; Amanda Caceres; Stella Tommasi; Ahmad Besaratinia
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  JUUL e-liquid exposure elicits cytoplasmic Ca2+ responses and leads to cytotoxicity in cultured airway epithelial cells.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Myles M Jones; Ronna E Dornsife; Tongde Wu; Vijay Sivaraman; Robert Tarran; Rob U Onyenwoke
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.372

4.  A survey exploring knowledge and beliefs about electronic cigarettes between health care providers and the general population in Egypt.

Authors:  Ibrahim Dwedar; Dina Ruby; Aya Mostafa
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2019-08-30

5.  Refill liquids for electronic cigarettes display peculiar toxicity on human endothelial cells.

Authors:  Sara De Martin; Daniela Gabbia; Sara Bogialli; Franco Biasioli; Andrea Boschetti; Ronald Gstir; Daniela Rainer; Luca Cappellin
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2021-02-26

6.  Electronic cigarette knowledge, attitudes and use among students at a university in Hangzhou, China.

Authors:  Juan Fang; Jianping Ren; Lixian Ren; Wendy Max; Tingting Yao; Falin Zhao
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.600

Review 7.  E-Cigarette Use: Device Market, Study Design, and Emerging Evidence of Biological Consequences.

Authors:  Hunter T Snoderly; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; Elizabeth C Bowdridge; Margaret F Bennewitz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  E-cigarettes: Effects in phagocytosis and cytokines response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Andromeda-Celeste Gómez; Pablo Rodríguez-Fernández; Raquel Villar-Hernández; Isidre Gibert; Beatriz Muriel-Moreno; Alicia Lacoma; Cristina Prat-Aymerich; Jose Domínguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  From Tobacco Cigarettes to Electronic Cigarettes: The Two Sides of a Nicotine Coin.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2021-11-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.