Soha Talih1, Zainab Balhas1, Rola Salman2, Nareg Karaoghlanian2, Alan Shihadeh3. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; 3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA as20@aub.edu.lb.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) electrically heat and vaporize a liquid solution to produce an inhalable nicotine-containing aerosol. Normally the electrical heater is fed the liquid via an automatic wick system. Some ECIG users, however, elect to directly drip liquid onto an exposed heater coil, reportedly for greater vapor production and throat hit. Use of such "direct drip atomizers" (DDAs) may involve greater exposure to non-nicotine toxicants due to the potentially higher temperatures reached by the coil. In this study we examined nicotine and volatile aldehyde (VA) emissions from one type of DDA under various use scenarios, and measured heater temperature. METHODS: Aerosols were machine-generated from an NHALER 510 Atomizer powered by an eGo-T battery (Joyetech), using a common PG-based liquid and a fixed puffing regimen. Inter-drip interval, the number of puffs drawn between replenishing the liquid on the coil, was varied from 2-4 puffs/drip. Total particulate matter, nicotine, and VA yields were quantified. Heater temperature was monitored using an infrared camera. RESULTS: Depending on the condition, VA emissions, including formaldehyde, greatly exceeded values previously reported for conventional ECIGs and combustible cigarettes, both per puff and per unit of nicotine yield. Increasing the inter-drip interval resulted in greater VA emissions, and lower total particulate matter and nicotine yields. Maximum heater coil temperature ranged from 130°C to more than 350°C. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the higher temperatures attained, DDAs are inherently likely to produce high toxicant emissions. The diversity of ECIG use methods, including potential off-label methods, should be considered as ECIG regulatory efforts proceed.
INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) electrically heat and vaporize a liquid solution to produce an inhalable nicotine-containing aerosol. Normally the electrical heater is fed the liquid via an automatic wick system. Some ECIG users, however, elect to directly drip liquid onto an exposed heater coil, reportedly for greater vapor production and throat hit. Use of such "direct drip atomizers" (DDAs) may involve greater exposure to non-nicotine toxicants due to the potentially higher temperatures reached by the coil. In this study we examined nicotine and volatile aldehyde (VA) emissions from one type of DDA under various use scenarios, and measured heater temperature. METHODS: Aerosols were machine-generated from an NHALER 510 Atomizer powered by an eGo-T battery (Joyetech), using a common PG-based liquid and a fixed puffing regimen. Inter-drip interval, the number of puffs drawn between replenishing the liquid on the coil, was varied from 2-4 puffs/drip. Total particulate matter, nicotine, and VA yields were quantified. Heater temperature was monitored using an infrared camera. RESULTS: Depending on the condition, VA emissions, including formaldehyde, greatly exceeded values previously reported for conventional ECIGs and combustible cigarettes, both per puff and per unit of nicotine yield. Increasing the inter-drip interval resulted in greater VA emissions, and lower total particulate matter and nicotine yields. Maximum heater coil temperature ranged from 130°C to more than 350°C. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the higher temperatures attained, DDAs are inherently likely to produce high toxicant emissions. The diversity of ECIG use methods, including potential off-label methods, should be considered as ECIG regulatory efforts proceed.
Authors: Sarah E Adkison; Richard J O'Connor; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Andrew Hyland; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Jakub Knysak; Michal Gawron; Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak; Jolanta Kurek; Adam Prokopowicz; Magdalena Jablonska-Czapla; Czeslawa Rosik-Dulewska; Christopher Havel; Peyton Jacob; Neal Benowitz Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Kanae Bekki; Shigehisa Uchiyama; Kazushi Ohta; Yohei Inaba; Hideki Nakagome; Naoki Kunugita Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Pebbles Fagan; Pallav Pokhrel; Thaddeus A Herzog; Eric T Moolchan; Kevin D Cassel; Adrian A Franke; Xingnan Li; Ian Pagano; Dennis R Trinidad; Kari-Lyn K Sakuma; Kymberle Sterling; Dorothy Jorgensen; Tania Lynch; Crissy Kawamoto; Mignonne C Guy; Ian Lagua; Sarah Hanes; Linda A Alexander; Mark S Clanton; Camonia Graham-Tutt; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Mignonne C Guy; Jacob Helt; Sherilyn Palafox; Kellie Green; Eric K Soule; Sarah F Maloney; Thomas Eissenberg; Pebbles Fagan Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Krysten W Bold; Steve Sussman; Stephanie S O'Malley; Rachel Grana; Jonathan Foulds; Howard Fishbein; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Kimberly G Wagoner; Micah Berman; Shyanika W Rose; Eunyoung Song; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Elizabeth G Klein; Dannielle E Kelley; Jessica L King; Mark Wolfson; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Katerina Nikitara; Charis Girvalaki; Christina N Kyriakos; Pete Driezen; Filippos T Filippidis; Sarah Kahnert; Sara C Hitchman; Ute Mons; Esteve Fernández; Antigona C Trofor; Krzysztof Przewoźniak; Tibor Demjén; Paraskevi A Katsaounou; Witold Zatoński; Geoffrey T Fong; Constantine I Vardavas Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.367