Literature DB >> 28861365

Comment on "Comparison of 45-degree Kelman and 45-degree balanced phaco tip designs in torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification".

Neelima Aron1, Sagnik Sen1, Sudarshan Khokhar1.   

Abstract

Year:  2017        PMID: 28861365      PMCID: PMC5554858          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.08.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Confusion about the importance of phaco tip configuration in comparing machine performance.

Authors:  Richard Packard
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Experimental anterior chamber maintenance in active versus passive phacoemulsification fluidics systems.

Authors:  C Manuel Nicoli; Ramon Dimalanta; Kevin M Miller
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Comparison of 45-degree Kelman and 45-degree balanced phaco tip designs in torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Süleyman Demircan; Mustafa Ataş; Emre Göktaş; Burhan Başkan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control.

Authors:  Kerry D Solomon; Ramón Lorente; Doug Fanney; Robert J Cionni
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Heat Generation and Efficiency of a New Modified Phaco Tip and Sleeve.

Authors:  Aeri Yoo; Ki Yeun Nam; Hungwon Tchah; Myoung Joon Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Erik Anderson; Geoffrey Hill; John J Chen; Thomas Patrianakos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.