Literature DB >> 28859453

Comparison of Complications, Trends, and Costs in Endoscopic vs Microscopic Pituitary Surgery: Analysis From a US Health Claims Database.

Anthony O Asemota1, Masaru Ishii1, Henry Brem1, Gary L Gallia1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microsurgical and endoscopic techniques are commonly utilized surgical approaches to pituitary pathologies. There are limited data comparing these 2 procedures.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postoperative complications, associated costs, and national and regional trends of microscopic and endoscopic techniques in the United States employing a nationwide database.
METHODS: The Truven MarketScan database 2010 to 2014 was queried and Current Procedural Terminology codes identified patients that underwent microscopic and/or endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. International Classification of Diseases codes identified postoperative complications. Adjusted logistic regression and matched propensity analysis evaluated independent odds for complications.
RESULTS: Among 5886 cases studied, 54.49% were microscopic and 45.51% endoscopic. The commonest surgical indications were benign pituitary tumors. Annual trends showed increasing utilization of endoscopic techniques vs microscopic procedures. Postoperative complications occurred in 40.04% of cases, including diabetes insipidus (DI; 16.90%), syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH; 2.02%), iatrogenic hypopituitarism (1.36%), fluid/electrolyte abnormalities (hypoosmolality/hyponatraemia [5.03%] and hyperosmolality/hypernatraemia [2.48%]), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks (CSF rhinorrhoea [4.42%] and other CSF leak [6.52%]). In our propensity-based model, patients that underwent endoscopic surgery were more likely to develop DI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28-1.72), SIADH (OR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.04-2.24), hypoosmolality/hyponatraemia (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.01-1.34), CSF rhinorrhoea (OR = 2.48; 95% CI = 1.88-3.28), other CSF leak (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.28-1.98), altered mental status (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = 1.01-2.60), and postoperative fever (OR = 4.31; 95% CI = 1.14-16.23). There were no differences in hemorrhagic complications, ophthalmological complications, or bacterial meningitis. Postoperative complications resulted in longer hospitalization and increased healthcare costs.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic approaches are increasingly being utilized to manage sellar pathologies relative to microsurgery. Postoperative complications occur in both techniques with higher incidences observed following endoscopic procedures.
Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endonasal; Endoscopic; Microscopic; Pituitary adenoma; Skull base surgery; Transsphenoidal

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28859453     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  18 in total

1.  Pituitary adenomas in children and young adults.

Authors:  Kara Leigh Krajewski; Roman Rotermund; Jörg Flitsch
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Gross total resection of pituitary adenomas after endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reem D Almutairi; Ivo S Muskens; David J Cote; Mark D Dijkman; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Erin Crocker; Kholoud Ghazawi; Marike L D Broekman; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary; Hasan A Zaidi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Endoscopic versus nonendoscopic surgery for resection of pituitary adenomas: a national database study.

Authors:  Khodayar Goshtasbi; Brandon M Lehrich; Mehdi Abouzari; Arash Abiri; Jack Birkenbeuel; Ming-Ying Lan; Wei-Hsin Wang; Gilbert Cadena; Frank P K Hsu; Edward C Kuan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 4.  The optimal numerosity of the referral population of pituitary tumors centers of excellence (PTCOE): A surgical perspective.

Authors:  Pietro Mortini; Gianluca Nocera; Francesca Roncelli; Marco Losa; Anna Maria Formenti; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  A practical method for prevention of readmission for symptomatic hyponatremia following transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  William T Burke; David J Cote; Sherry I Iuliano; Hasan A Zaidi; Edward R Laws
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Patterns of seizure prophylaxis after oncologic neurosurgery.

Authors:  Brett E Youngerman; Evan F Joiner; Xianling Wang; Jingyan Yang; Mary R Welch; Guy M McKhann; Jason D Wright; Dawn L Hershman; Alfred I Neugut; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Hospital Charge Variability across New York State: Sociodemographic Factors in Pituitary Surgery.

Authors:  Sarah M Kidwai; Anthony Yang; Mingyang L Gray; Sean McKee; Alfred Marc Iloreta; Raj Shrivastava; Satish Govindaraj
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-01-04

Review 8.  Management of NFAs: medical treatment.

Authors:  Naomi Even-Zohar; Yona Greenman
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Characteristics and overall survival in pediatric versus adult pituitary adenoma: a National Cancer Database analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin F Bitner; Brandon M Lehrich; Arash Abiri; Tyler M Yasaka; Frank P K Hsu; Edward C Kuan
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.107

10.  4K 3-dimensional video microscope system (orbeye) for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.

Authors:  Roman Rotermund; Jan Regelsberger; Katharina Osterhage; Jens Aberle; Jörg Flitsch
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.