Brett E Youngerman1, Evan F Joiner2, Xianling Wang3, Jingyan Yang3, Mary R Welch4,5, Guy M McKhann2,5, Jason D Wright5,6, Dawn L Hershman3,5,7, Alfred I Neugut3,5,7, Jeffrey N Bruce2,5. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. bey2103@cumc.columbia.edu. 2. Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting routine postoperative antiepileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis following oncologic neurosurgery is limited, and actual practice patterns are largely unknown beyond survey data. OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns and predictors of postoperative AED prophylaxis following intracranial tumor surgery. METHODS: The MarketScan Database was used to analyze pharmacy claims data and clinical characteristics in a national sample over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Among 5895 patients in the cohort, levetiracetam was the most widely used AED for prophylaxis (78.5%) followed by phenytoin (20.5%). Prophylaxis was common but highly variable for patients who underwent open resection of supratentorial intraparenchymal tumors (62.5%, reference) or meningiomas (61.9%). In multivariate analysis, biopsies were less likely to receive prophylaxis (44.8%, OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.67), and there was near consensus against prophylaxis for infratentorial (9.7%, OR 0.07, CI 0.05-0.09) and transsphenoidal procedures (0.4%, OR 0.003, CI 0.001-0.010). Primary malignancies (52.1%, reference) and secondary metastases (42.2%) were more likely to receive prophylaxis than benign tumors (23.0%, OR 0.63, CI 0.48-0.83), as were patients discharged with home services and patients in the Northeast. There was a large spike in duration of AED use at approximately 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Use of seizure prophylaxis following intracranial biopsies and supratentorial resections is highly variable, consistent with a lack of guidelines or consensus. Current practice patterns do not support a clear standard of care and may be driven in part by geographic variation, availability of post-discharge services, and electronic prescribing defaults rather than evidence. Given uncertainty regarding effectiveness, indications, and appropriate duration of AED prophylaxis, well-powered trials are needed.
BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting routine postoperative antiepileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis following oncologic neurosurgery is limited, and actual practice patterns are largely unknown beyond survey data. OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns and predictors of postoperative AED prophylaxis following intracranial tumor surgery. METHODS: The MarketScan Database was used to analyze pharmacy claims data and clinical characteristics in a national sample over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Among 5895 patients in the cohort, levetiracetam was the most widely used AED for prophylaxis (78.5%) followed by phenytoin (20.5%). Prophylaxis was common but highly variable for patients who underwent open resection of supratentorial intraparenchymal tumors (62.5%, reference) or meningiomas (61.9%). In multivariate analysis, biopsies were less likely to receive prophylaxis (44.8%, OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.67), and there was near consensus against prophylaxis for infratentorial (9.7%, OR 0.07, CI 0.05-0.09) and transsphenoidal procedures (0.4%, OR 0.003, CI 0.001-0.010). Primary malignancies (52.1%, reference) and secondary metastases (42.2%) were more likely to receive prophylaxis than benign tumors (23.0%, OR 0.63, CI 0.48-0.83), as were patients discharged with home services and patients in the Northeast. There was a large spike in duration of AED use at approximately 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Use of seizure prophylaxis following intracranial biopsies and supratentorial resections is highly variable, consistent with a lack of guidelines or consensus. Current practice patterns do not support a clear standard of care and may be driven in part by geographic variation, availability of post-discharge services, and electronic prescribing defaults rather than evidence. Given uncertainty regarding effectiveness, indications, and appropriate duration of AED prophylaxis, well-powered trials are needed.
Authors: Michael C Dewan; Reid C Thompson; Steven N Kalkanis; Fred G Barker; Constantinos G Hadjipanayis Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Jason D Wright; Ling Chen; Soledad Jorge; William M Burke; Ana I Tergas; June Y Hou; Jim C Hu; Alfred I Neugut; Cande V Ananth; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: S Franceschetti; S Binelli; M Casazza; S Lodrini; F Panzica; F Pluchino; C L Solero; G Avanzini Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 1990 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Shivanand P Lad; Jacob H Bagley; Isaac O Karikari; Ranjith Babu; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Maiying Kong; Robert E Isaacs; Carlos A Bagley; Oren N Gottfried; Chirag G Patil; Maxwell Boakye Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Tom Mikkelsen; Nina A Paleologos; Paula D Robinson; Mario Ammirati; David W Andrews; Anthony L Asher; Stuart H Burri; Charles S Cobbs; Laurie E Gaspar; Douglas Kondziolka; Mark E Linskey; Jay S Loeffler; Michael McDermott; Minesh P Mehta; Jeffrey J Olson; Roy A Patchell; Timothy C Ryken; Steven N Kalkanis Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Brian Stocksdale; Seema Nagpal; John D Hixson; Derek R Johnson; Prashant Rai; Akhil Shivaprasad; Ivo W Tremont-Lukats Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2020-05-20
Authors: Nayan Lamba; Paul J Catalano; Daniel N Cagney; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Ellen J Bubrick; Patrick Y Wen; Ayal A Aizer Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Marco Zoccarato; Lucia Nardetto; Anna Maria Basile; Bruno Giometto; Vittorina Zagonel; Giuseppe Lombardi Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 6.244