Literature DB >> 33939058

Characteristics and overall survival in pediatric versus adult pituitary adenoma: a National Cancer Database analysis.

Benjamin F Bitner1, Brandon M Lehrich2, Arash Abiri1, Tyler M Yasaka1, Frank P K Hsu3, Edward C Kuan4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pituitary adenomas in the pediatric population are extremely rare, resulting in limited information in the literature on these patients. In this study, data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to compare pituitary adenoma clinical presentations, treatment management patterns, and overall survival between pediatric and adult patients.
METHODS: The NCDB was queried for all cases of histologically confirmed pituitary adenoma treated between 2004 and 2015. Patients were primarily stratified as either pediatric (< 18 years) or adult (≥ 18 years). Patient demographics/socioeconomics and resulting outcomes were then compared.
RESULTS: 1893 pediatric and 77,993 adult patients with pituitary adenomas were evaluated. Average tumor size for pediatric and adult patients was 13.6 ± 13.2 mm and 20.1 ± 13.1 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). Pediatric patients were more likely to undergo gross total resection, less likely to receive adjuvant radiation, more likely to receive medical therapy, more likely to undergo active surveillance, and exhibited improved 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS) (all p < 0.001). Temporal analysis demonstrated a significant increase in endoscopic approach over time (from 48 to 65%) in the pediatric population (R2 = 0.722, p = 0.03). On univariate analysis in the pediatric population, African American race compared to Caucasians (HR: 5.85, 95% CI 1.79-19.2, p < 0.003), patients with government insurance compared to those with private insurance (HR: 5.07, 95% CI 1.31-19.6, p < 0.02) and uninsured patients compared to those with private insurance (HR: 14.4, 95% CI 2.41-86.5, p < 0.003) were associated with decreased OS. Lastly, patients who underwent GTR had improved OS compared to those who underwent subtotal resection (HR: 0.08, 95% CI 0.008-0.93, p < 0.04) in the pediatric population.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to adults, children with pituitary adenomas more commonly underwent GTR, less frequently underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, more frequently underwent medical management and active surveillance, and had improved survival. Temporal analysis demonstrated increasing utilization of the endoscopic approach for surgical treatment of pediatric and adult pituitary adenoma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; National cancer database; Pediatric; Pituitary adenoma; Skull base; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33939058     DOI: 10.1007/s11102-021-01146-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   4.107


  48 in total

1.  A prospective study of the clinical impact of a multidisciplinary head and neck tumor board.

Authors:  Stephen A Wheless; Kibwei A McKinney; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Pediatric Pituitary Adenomas: Early and Long-Term Surgical Outcome in a Series of 85 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Lina Raffaella Barzaghi; Marco Losa; Jody Filippo Capitanio; Luigi Albano; Giovanna Weber; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Epidemiology of pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  E B Gold
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 4.  Using the National Cancer Database for Outcomes Research: A Review.

Authors:  Daniel J Boffa; Joshua E Rosen; Katherine Mallin; Ashley Loomis; Greer Gay; Bryan Palis; Kathleen Thoburn; Donna Gress; Daniel P McKellar; Lawrence N Shulman; Matthew A Facktor; David P Winchester
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  Macroprolactinomas in children and adolescents: factors associated with the response to treatment in 77 patients.

Authors:  Sylvie Salenave; Deborah Ancelle; Thibaut Bahougne; Gérald Raverot; Peter Kamenický; Jérôme Bouligand; Anne Guiochon-Mantel; Agnès Linglart; Pierre-François Souchon; Marc Nicolino; Jacques Young; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Brigitte Delemer; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Treatment at high-volume facilities and academic centers is independently associated with improved survival in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  John M David; Allen S Ho; Michael Luu; Emi J Yoshida; Sungjin Kim; Alain C Mita; Kevin S Scher; Stephen L Shiao; Mourad Tighiouart; Zachary S Zumsteg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Prolactinomas in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Annamaria Colao; Sandro Loche
Journal:  Endocr Dev       Date:  2009-11-24

Review 8.  Pituitary tumors in childhood: update of diagnosis, treatment and molecular genetics.

Authors:  Margaret F Keil; Constantine A Stratakis
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.618

9.  Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  L A Kane; M C Leinung; B W Scheithauer; E J Bergstralh; E R Laws; R V Groover; K Kovacs; E Horvath; D Zimmerman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 10.  Pediatric sinonasal and skull base lesions.

Authors:  Charles A Riley; Christian P Soneru; Jonathan B Overdevest; Marc L Otten; David A Gudis
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Management of prolactinomas in children and adolescents; which factors define the response to treatment?

Authors:  Ayfer Alikasifoglu; Nur Berna Celik; Zeynep Alev Ozon; Elmas Nazli Gonc; Nurgun Kandemir
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 4.107

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.