Literature DB >> 28859398

Component analysis of enhanced recovery pathways for esophagectomy.

S R Markar, R Naik, G Malietzis, L Halliday, T Athanasiou, K Moorthy.   

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review is to identify key components of enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) that lead to improved length of hospital stay (LOS) following esophagectomy. Relevant electronic databases were searched for studies comparing clinical outcome from esophagectomy followed by a conventional pathway versus ERP. Relevant outcome measures were compared and metaregression was performed to identify the key ERP components associated with reduced in LOS. Thirteen publications were included, ERP was associated with no changes in in-hospital mortality, total complications, anastomotic leak, or pulmonary complications compared with a conventional pathway, however LOS was reduced in the ERP group. Metaregression identified that immediate extubation was associated with reduced LOS (OR = -0.51, 95%CI -0.77 to -0.25; P < 0.01). Several postoperative factors were associated with a significant reduction in length of hospital stay, and in order of most important were (i) gastrograffin swallow ≤5 days (OR = -4.27, 95%CI -4.50 to -4.03); (ii) mobilization on postoperative day ≤1 (OR = -2.49, 95%CI -2.63 to -2.34); (iii) removal of urinary catheter ≤2 days (OR = -0.99, 95%CI -1.15 to -0.84); (iv) oral intake with at least sips of fluid ≤1 day (OR = -0.96, 95%CI -1.24 to -0.68); (v) enteral diet with feeding jejunostomy or gastrostomy ≤ 1 day (OR = -0.57, 95%CI -0.80 to -0.35) and (vi) epidural removal ≤ 4 days (OR = -0.17, 95%CI -0.27 to -0.07). Several core ERP components and principles appear to be associated with LOS reduction. These elements should form a part of the core ERP for the specialty, while surgical teams incorporate other elements through an iterative process.
© The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal cancer; esophageal cancer surgery; supportive care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28859398     DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  9 in total

1.  Early oral intake through meticulous chewing after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Ian Wong; Simon Law
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Completely Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Hybrid Esophagectomy for Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junctional Cancer: Clinical and Short-Term Oncological Outcomes.

Authors:  Krashna Patel; Omar Abbassi; Cheuk Bong Tang; Bruno Lorenzi; Alexandros Charalabopoulos; Sritharan Kadirkamanathan; Naga Venkatesh Jayanthi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  State of the art of enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in esophagogastric cancer surgery: the Western experience.

Authors:  Silvia Salvans; Luis Grande; Mariagiulia Dal Cero; Manuel Pera
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-06-21

4.  Enhanced recovery pathways vs standard care pathways in esophageal cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tania Triantafyllou; Michael T Olson; Dimitrios Theodorou; Dimitrios Schizas; Saurabh Singhal
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.230

5.  Benchmark values for transthoracic esophagectomy are not set as the defined "best possible"-a validation study.

Authors:  Olli Helminen; Johanna Mrena; Eero Sihvo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer: The role of active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  Tania Triantafyllou; Bas Wijnhoven
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-07-25

7.  Guide to Enhanced Recovery for Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery: ERAS and Oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Krishna Moorthy; Laura Halliday
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Is there a relationship between two different anesthetic methods and postoperative length of stay during radical resection of malignant esophageal tumors in China?: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jieping Yang; Xukeng Guo; Zonggui Zheng; Weiqi Ke
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.376

Review 9.  The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  Apurva Ashok; Devayani Niyogi; Priya Ranganathan; Sandeep Tandon; Maheema Bhaskar; George Karimundackal; Sabita Jiwnani; Madhavi Shetmahajan; C S Pramesh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.549

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.