Literature DB >> 28859356

Quantitation of spatial and temporal variability of biomarkers for Barrett's Esophagus.

J Nwachokor1, O Tawfik2,3, M Danley2, S Mathur2,4, J House5, P Sharma3,6,7, L K Christenson8, A Bansal3,6,7.   

Abstract

Chemoprevention and risk-stratification studies in Barrett's esophagus (BE) rely on biomarkers but the variability in their temporal and spatial expression is unknown. If such variability exists, it will impact sampling techniques and sample size calculations. Specimens from three levels of biopsies over two serial endoscopies in nondysplastic BE patients were analyzed for aneuploidy, proliferation markers (Ki67, Mcm2), and cell cycle markers (cyclin A and cyclin D1). A modification of the image cytometry technique, where cytokeratin staining automatically distinguished epithelial and stromal cells, measured aneuploidy on whole tissue sections. Other biomarkers were studied by immunohistochemistry. Coefficient of variability (SD/mean) was calculated; a value <10% indicated low variability. A total of 120 specimens (20 subjects each with three biopsy levels at two time points) from nondysplastic BE patients (71 ± 8.8 years, all Caucasian, 90% males, C5.1M7.5 ± 3.4 cm) were analyzed. The mean interval between endoscopies was 32.8 ± 8.4 months. Aneuploidy had a spatial variability of 6.8% at visit 1 (mean diploid index: 1.1 ± 0.09) and 7.9% at visit 2 (mean diploid index: 1.1 ± 0.06) and a temporal variability of 7.0-8.1% for the three levels. For other biomarkers, the spatial variability ranged from ∼5 to 30% at visit 1 and 11-92% at visit 2 and the temporal variability ranged from 0 to 77%. To conclude, of all the biomarkers, only aneuploidy had both spatial and temporal variability of <10%. Spatial and temporal variability were biomarker dependent and could be as high as 90% even without progression. These data will be useful to design chemoprevention and risk-stratification studies in BE. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus 2017. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; Barrett's esophagus; biomarker variability; cell cycle markers; proliferation markers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28859356      PMCID: PMC6036660          DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  37 in total

1.  Endoscopic mapping and surrogate markers for better surveillance in Barrett esophagus. A study of 700 biopsy specimens.

Authors:  P Bhargava; G M Eisen; D A Holterman; N Azumi; D P Hartmann; J J Hanfelt; S B Benjamin; M E Lippman; E A Montgomery
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 2.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence.

Authors:  Heiko Pohl; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Randomised clinical trial: twice daily esomeprazole 40 mg vs. pantoprazole 40 mg in Barrett's oesophagus for 1 year.

Authors:  N de Bortoli; I Martinucci; P Piaggi; S Maltinti; G Bianchi; E Ciancia; D Gambaccini; F Lenzi; F Costa; G Leonardi; A Ricchiuti; M G Mumolo; M Bellini; C Blandizzi; S Marchi
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Pharmacodynamic analysis of target inhibition and endothelial cell death in tumors treated with the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor antagonists SU5416 or SU6668.

Authors:  Darren W Davis; Ryan Takamori; Chandrajit P Raut; Henry Q Xiong; Roy S Herbst; Walter M Stadler; John V Heymach; George D Demetri; Asif Rashid; Yu Shen; Sijin Wen; James L Abbruzzese; David J McConkey
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Image cytometry accurately detects DNA ploidy abnormalities and predicts late relapse to high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus following photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  J M Dunn; G D Mackenzie; D Oukrif; C A Mosse; M R Banks; S Thorpe; P Sasieni; S G Bown; M R Novelli; P S Rabinovitch; L B Lovat
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Whole slide image cytometry: a novel method to detect abnormal DNA content in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Yinhai Wang; Damian T McManus; Kenneth Arthur; Brian T Johnston; Andrew J Kennedy; Helen G Coleman; Liam J Murray; Peter W Hamilton
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 8.  Biomarkers in Barrett's Esophagus: Role in Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Prediction of Response to Therapy.

Authors:  Ajay Bansal; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.806

9.  Cyclin A immunocytology as a risk stratification tool for Barrett's esophagus surveillance.

Authors:  Pierre Lao-Sirieix; Laurence Lovat; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: comparison with CAS 200.

Authors:  Qin Huang; Chenggong Yu; Michael Klein; James Fang; Raj K Goyal
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-08-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  Massively Parallel Sequencing of Esophageal Brushings Enables an Aneuploidy-Based Classification of Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Christopher Douville; Helen R Moinova; Prashanthi N Thota; Nicholas J Shaheen; Prasad G Iyer; Marcia Irene Canto; Jean S Wang; John A Dumot; Ashley Faulx; Kenneth W Kinzler; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Bert Vogelstein; Sanford D Markowitz; Chetan Bettegowda; Joseph E Willis; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  The SpaTemp cohort: 168 nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus surveillance patients with and without progression to early neoplasia to evaluate the distribution of biomarkers over space and time.

Authors:  N F Frei; K Konté; L C Duits; E Klaver; F J Ten Kate; G J Offerhaus; S L Meijer; M Visser; C A Seldenrijk; E J Schoon; B L A M Weusten; B E Schenk; R C Mallant-Hent; J J Bergman; R E Pouw
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.822

3.  Independent Validation of a Tissue Systems Pathology Assay to Predict Future Progression in Nondysplastic Barrett's Esophagus: A Spatial-Temporal Analysis.

Authors:  Nicola F Frei; Kadère Konte; Emily A Bossart; Katelyn Stebbins; Yi Zhang; Roos E Pouw; Rebecca J Critchley-Thorne; Jacques J G H M Bergman
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.396

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.