Literature DB >> 15701856

Pharmacodynamic analysis of target inhibition and endothelial cell death in tumors treated with the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor antagonists SU5416 or SU6668.

Darren W Davis1, Ryan Takamori, Chandrajit P Raut, Henry Q Xiong, Roy S Herbst, Walter M Stadler, John V Heymach, George D Demetri, Asif Rashid, Yu Shen, Sijin Wen, James L Abbruzzese, David J McConkey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of small molecule inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2 (SU5416 and SU6668) on receptor phosphorylation in tumor xenografts and in paired tumor biopsies obtained in three clinical trials in patients with advanced solid malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: The dose-dependent effects of SU6668 on angiogenesis and tumor growth were investigated in orthotopic L3.6pl pancreatic tumors. Excisional or 18G core biopsies were obtained from patients before and after therapy with SU5416 or SU6668. Laser scanning cytometry-mediated analysis was used to quantify levels of phosphorylated and total VEGFRs and platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR), tumor microvessel densities, vessel sizes, and endothelial and tumor cell apoptosis.
RESULTS: Significant inhibition of tumor microvessel density and growth and increased apoptosis were observed at SU6668 maximum tolerated dose (100 mg/kg) in L3.6pl xenografts. At 6 hours post therapy, SU6668 reduced VEGFR and PDGFR phosphorylation in the tumors by 50% and 92%, respectively, but levels rebounded beyond the baselines by 24 hours. Levels of phosphorylated VEGFR-2 and PDGFR also decreased significantly ( approximately 50%) 6 hours after therapy in 1 of 6 primary human tumors treated with SU6668, but these effects were not associated with increased apoptosis. A significant increase in endothelial cell apoptosis was observed in one tumor exposed to SU5416 and was associated with an increase in vessel size, but these changes occurred without an increase in tumor cell death.
CONCLUSIONS: SU5416 and SU6668 displayed biological activity in xenografts. However, neither drug produced marked biological activity in primary patient tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15701856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  10 in total

1.  Laser scanning cytometry: principles and applications.

Authors:  Piotr Pozarowski; Elena Holden; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2006

2.  A phase II study of lapatinib in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Jonas A de Souza; Darren W Davis; Yujian Zhang; Arun Khattri; Tanguy Y Seiwert; Serdal Aktolga; Stuart J Wong; Mark F Kozloff; Sreenivasa Nattam; Mark W Lingen; Rangesh Kunnavakkam; Kerstin M Stenson; Elizabeth A Blair; Jeffrey Bozeman; Janet E Dancey; Everett E Vokes; Ezra E W Cohen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Cell-based quantification of molecular biomarkers in histopathology specimens.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Kofahi; Wiem Lassoued; Kedar Grama; Sumit K Nath; Jianliang Zhu; Ridha Oueslati; Michael Feldman; William M F Lee; Badrinath Roysam
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Upregulated stromal EGFR and vascular remodeling in mouse xenograft models of angiogenesis inhibitor-resistant human lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tina Cascone; Matthew H Herynk; Li Xu; Zhiqiang Du; Humam Kadara; Monique B Nilsson; Carol J Oborn; Yun-Yong Park; Baruch Erez; Jörg J Jacoby; Ju-Seog Lee; Heather Y Lin; Fortunato Ciardiello; Roy S Herbst; Robert R Langley; John V Heymach
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Quantitation of spatial and temporal variability of biomarkers for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  J Nwachokor; O Tawfik; M Danley; S Mathur; J House; P Sharma; L K Christenson; A Bansal
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 6.  Targeting angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer: rationale and pitfalls.

Authors:  Chery Whipple; Murray Korc
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase I/II study.

Authors:  Ezra E W Cohen; Darren W Davis; Theodore G Karrison; Tanguy Y Seiwert; Stuart J Wong; Sreenivasa Nattam; Mark F Kozloff; Joseph I Clark; Duen-Hwa Yan; Wen Liu; Carolyn Pierce; Janet E Dancey; Kerstin Stenson; Elizabeth Blair; Allison Dekker; Everett E Vokes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Reporting practices of pharmacodynamic studies involving invasive research procedures in cancer trials.

Authors:  G A Freeman; J Kimmelman; J Dancey; J G Monzon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in advanced pancreatic cancer: results of two phase II studies.

Authors:  Milind M Javle; Rachna T Shroff; Henry Xiong; Gauri A Varadhachary; David Fogelman; Shrikanth A Reddy; Darren Davis; Yujian Zhang; Robert A Wolff; James L Abbruzzese
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Comparison of effects of anti-angiogenic agents in the zebrafish efficacy-toxicity model for translational anti-angiogenic drug discovery.

Authors:  Geetanjali Chimote; Jayasree Sreenivasan; Nilambari Pawar; Jyothi Subramanian; Hariharan Sivaramakrishnan; Somesh Sharma
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.162

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.