Literature DB >> 26237272

Whole slide image cytometry: a novel method to detect abnormal DNA content in Barrett's esophagus.

Yinhai Wang1, Damian T McManus2,3, Kenneth Arthur3, Brian T Johnston2, Andrew J Kennedy2, Helen G Coleman4, Liam J Murray4, Peter W Hamilton3.   

Abstract

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Both low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) are associated with an increased risk of progression to EAC. However, histological interpretation and grading of dysplasia (particularly LGD) is subjective and poorly reproducible. This study has combined whole slide imaging with DNA image cytometry to provide a novel method for the detection of abnormal DNA content through image analysis of tissue sections. A total of 20 cases were evaluated, including 8 negative for dysplasia (NFD), 6 LGD, and 6 HGD. Feulgen-stained esophageal sections were scanned in their entirety. Barrett's mucosa was interactively chosen for automatic nuclei segmentation where irrelevant cell types were ignored. The combined DNA content histogram for all nuclei within selected image regions was then obtained. In addition, three histogram measurements were computed, including xER-5C, 2cDI, and DNA-MG. Visual evaluation suggested the shape of DNA content histograms from NFD, LGD, and HGD cases exhibiting identifiable differences. The histogram measurements, xER-5C, 2cDI, and DNA-MG, were shown to be effective in differentiating metaplastic from dysplastic cases with statistical significance. Moreover, they also successfully separated NFD, LGD, and HGD patients with statistical significance. Whole slide image cytometry is a novel and effective method for the detection of abnormal DNA content in BE. Compared with histological review, it is more objective. Compared with flow cytometry and cytology-preparation image cytometry, it is low cost, simple to use, only requires a single 1 μm section, and facilitates selection of tissue and topographical correlation. Whole slide image cytometry can detect differences in DNA content between NFD, LGD, and HGD patients in this cross-sectional study. Abnormal DNA content detection by whole slide image cytometry is a promising biomarker of progression that could affect future diagnostics in BE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26237272     DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2015.98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  55 in total

1.  Routinely diagnosed low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus: a population-based study of natural history.

Authors:  Piers Gatenby; James Ramus; Christine Caygill; Neil Shepherd; Marc Winslet; Anthony Watson
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Statistical shape model based segmentation of medical images.

Authors:  A Neumann; C Lorenz
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 3.  Still waiting for predictive biomarkers in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  L H Moyes; J J Going
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Flow cytometry and cell sorting of heterogeneous microbial populations: the importance of single-cell analyses.

Authors:  H M Davey; D B Kell
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-12

5.  The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence.

Authors:  Heiko Pohl; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Trends in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in ten European countries.

Authors:  A A Botterweck; L J Schouten; A Volovics; E Dorant; P A van Den Brandt
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Image analysis for neuroblastoma classification: segmentation of cell nuclei.

Authors:  Metin N Gurcan; Tony Pan; Hiro Shimada; Joel Saltz
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2006

8.  A comparison of conventional cytology, DNA ploidy analysis, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Emily G Barr Fritcher; Shannon M Brankley; Benjamin R Kipp; Jesse S Voss; Michael B Campion; Larry E Morrison; Mona S Legator; Lori S Lutzke; Kenneth K Wang; Thomas J Sebo; Kevin C Halling
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  A cross sectional study of p504s, CD133, and Twist expression in the esophageal metaplasia dysplasia adenocarcinoma sequence.

Authors:  J Ahmad; K Arthur; P Maxwell; A Kennedy; B T Johnston; L Murray; D T McManus
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.429

10.  DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: comparison with CAS 200.

Authors:  Qin Huang; Chenggong Yu; Michael Klein; James Fang; Raj K Goyal
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-08-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantitation of spatial and temporal variability of biomarkers for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  J Nwachokor; O Tawfik; M Danley; S Mathur; J House; P Sharma; L K Christenson; A Bansal
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.429

2.  Massively Parallel Sequencing of Esophageal Brushings Enables an Aneuploidy-Based Classification of Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Christopher Douville; Helen R Moinova; Prashanthi N Thota; Nicholas J Shaheen; Prasad G Iyer; Marcia Irene Canto; Jean S Wang; John A Dumot; Ashley Faulx; Kenneth W Kinzler; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Bert Vogelstein; Sanford D Markowitz; Chetan Bettegowda; Joseph E Willis; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Polyploid giant cancer cell characterization: New frontiers in predicting response to chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Geetanjali Saini; Shriya Joshi; Chakravarthy Garlapati; Hongxiao Li; Jun Kong; Jayashree Krishnamurthy; Michelle D Reid; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 17.012

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.