Literature DB >> 28856751

Rules for connectivity of secondary structure elements in protein: Two-layer αβ sandwiches.

Shintaro Minami1, George Chikenji2, Motonori Ota1.   

Abstract

In protein structures, the fold is described according to the spatial arrangement of secondary structure elements (SSEs: α-helices and β-strands) and their connectivity. The connectivity or the pattern of links among SSEs is one of the most important factors for understanding the variety of protein folds. In this study, we introduced the connectivity strings that encode the connectivities by using the types, positions, and connections of SSEs, and computationally enumerated all the connectivities of two-layer αβ sandwiches. The calculated connectivities were compared with those in natural proteins determined using MICAN, a nonsequential structure comparison method. For 2α-4β, among 23,000 of all connectivities, only 48 were free from irregular connectivities such as loop crossing. Of these, only 20 were found in natural proteins and the superfamilies were biased toward certain types of connectivities. A similar disproportional distribution was confirmed for most of other spatial arrangements of SSEs in the two-layer αβ sandwiches. We found two connectivity rules that explain the bias well: the abundances of interlayer connecting loops that bridge SSEs in the distinct layers; and nonlocal β-strand pairs, two spatially adjacent β-strands located at discontinuous positions in the amino acid sequence. A two-dimensional plot of these two properties indicated that the two connectivity rules are not independent, which may be interpreted as a rule for the cooperativity of proteins.
© 2017 The Protein Society.

Keywords:  ECOD domains; cooperativity; ferredoxin; protein architecture; protein fold; protein structure comparison; protein topology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28856751      PMCID: PMC5654862          DOI: 10.1002/pro.3285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  47 in total

1.  Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  Helen Berman; Kim Henrick; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2003-12

2.  Protein fold comparison by the alignment of topological strings.

Authors:  Linus O Johannissen; William R Taylor
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2003-12

3.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

4.  Relative orientation of close-packed beta-pleated sheets in proteins.

Authors:  C Chothia; J Janin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  On the conformation of proteins: the handedness of the beta-strand-alpha-helix-beta-strand unit.

Authors:  M J Sternberg; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1976-08-15       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins.

Authors:  K W Plaxco; K T Simons; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-04-10       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Packing of secondary structural elements in proteins. Analysis and prediction of inter-helix distances.

Authors:  B V Reddy; T L Blundell
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-01

9.  SCOPe: Manual Curation and Artifact Removal in the Structural Classification of Proteins - extended Database.

Authors:  John-Marc Chandonia; Naomi K Fox; Steven E Brenner
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Comparison of the folding processes of distantly related proteins. Importance of hydrophobic content in folding.

Authors:  Giulia Calloni; Niccolò Taddei; Kevin W Plaxco; Giampietro Ramponi; Massimo Stefani; Fabrizio Chiti
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-07-11       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Structural Rule Distinguishing a Superfold: A Case Study of Ferredoxin Fold and the Reverse Ferredoxin Fold.

Authors:  Takumi Nishina; Megumi Nakajima; Masaki Sasai; George Chikenji
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.927

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.