| Literature DB >> 28855948 |
Sinai Li1,2, Yibing Nong1,3, Qun Gao1, Jing Liu1, Yan Li1, Xiaoyun Cui1, Jie Wan1, Jinjin Lu1, Mingjie Sun4, Qian Wu4, Xiaolu Shi4, Haifeng Cui4, Weihong Liu2, Mingxue Zhou2, Lina Li5, Qian Lin1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Astragalus was broadly used for treating heart failure (HF) and arrhythmias in East Asia for thousands of years. Astragalus granule (AG), extracted from Astragalus, shows beneficial effect on the treatment of HF in clinical research. We hypothesized that administration of AG prevents the remodeling of L-type Ca2+ current (ICa-L) in HF mice by the downregulation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII).Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28855948 PMCID: PMC5569633 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7517358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Cumulative overall survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curve from groups. P < 0.05 versus sham group.
Figure 2Effect of AG on heart function. (a) Representative echocardiography images from groups. (b) The left ventricle ejection fraction from the sham (n = 12), TAC (n = 8), and TAC + AG (n = 10) groups. (c) The ratio of E/E from the sham (n = 12), TAC (n = 8), and TAC + AG (n = 10) groups. P < 0.01 versus sham group, #P < 0.05 versus TAC group.
Figure 3Effect of AG on electrophysiology in heart failure. (a) Representative ECG images from the sham, TAC, and TAC + AG groups. (b) The QT from the sham (n = 12), TAC (n = 8), and TAC + AG (n = 10) groups. (c) The QTc from the sham (n = 12), TAC (n = 8), and TAC + AG (n = 10) groups. (d) Representative AP traces from groups. (e) The APD90 from each group (n = 6). P < 0.01 versus sham group, ##P < 0.01 versus TAC group.
Figure 4Effect of AG on ICa-L remodeling. (a) The I-V relationship from groups (n = 6). (b) The peak current densities at 0 mV from each group (n = 6). (c) ICa-L inactivation fast (τ1) and slow (τ2) time constants from each group (n = 6). (d) Quantification of Cav1.2 expression levels (n = 3). (e) Representative western blots. P < 0.01 versus sham group; #P < 0.05 versus TAC group; ##P < 0.01 versus TAC group.
Figure 5Effect of AG on ICa-L modulation relative protein kinase. (a) Quantification of CaMKII and p-PKA expression levels (n = 3). (b) Representative western blots. ((c)–(e)) Typical ICa-L traces at 0.1 Hz and 1.0 Hz from the sham (c), TAC (d), and TAC + AG groups (e). (f) The variance ratio of peak ICa-L between 0.1 Hz and 1.0 Hz from each group (n = 6). P < 0.01 versus sham group, #P < 0.05 versus TAC group; red arrow and blue arrow indicate positive and negative frequency-dependent ICa-L facilitation, respectively.