| Literature DB >> 28855843 |
Aziz Faissal1,2, N Ouazzani2,3, J R Parrado4, M Dary5, H Manyani5, B R Morgado4, M D Barragán4, L Mandi2,3.
Abstract
The quality of soil is strongly bound by several interactions between chemical and biological components, including microbial composition, which are a key importance for soil performance. Cultural activities have a huge induction on soil health, through both modification of physicochemical proprieties and changing on soil microbial communities. This usually affects the safety of soil, and then the crop production and water. In the present work, the information on bacterial community composition was determined from a set of 6 soils collected from 2 farms in agricultural land of Marrakech (Morocco), one of which used poultry manure (PM) and the other cow manure (CM) as fertilizers. To profile this structure of the bacterial community Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S rDNA fragments has been used. These amendments resulted in the appearance of several novel bands and different relative intensities of bands between the control station and other sites studied. The stations most affected are those receiving a supply of manure rather high, which results in an organic and bacterial load in the soil. The results showed a bacterial diversity very important indicating a fecal contamination like Bacteroides, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus,… etc. Bacteria pertain to the phylum Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were noted to be the dominant ribotype in amended soil. Moreover, this work demonstrates also the existence of pathogens strains in soil amended by poultry manure (PM) belonging to the Clostridiales order and Pseudomonadales. The pathogenic bacteria detected posing a hazard of human contagion when they are used for soil practice.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial community; Cow and poultry manure; Molecular approach; Natural fertilization; Soil health
Year: 2017 PMID: 28855843 PMCID: PMC5562461 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.01.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Oligonucleotide primers used for PCR.
| Primer | Primer sequence (5′ → 3′) |
|---|---|
| 341F-GC* | |
| 907R |
F, Forward; R, reverse.
*GC clamp, CGCCCGGGGCGCGCCCCGGGCGGGGCGGGGGCACGGGGGG.
Chemical properties of manure fertilization.
| Farmers | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | CM1 | CM2 | CM3 | PM1 | PM2 | PM3 | |
| pH | 7.12 ± 0.11 | 5.72 ± 0.07 | 5.61 ± 0.14 | 5.44 ± 0.08 | 6.51 ± 0.16 | 6.32 ± 0.12 | 6.82 ± 0.09 |
| TN (g/kg) | 1.49 ± 0.03 | 2.01 ± 0.06 | 1.91 ± 0.04 | 2.12 ± 0.13 | 1.84 ± 0.15 | 1.69 ± 0.08 | 1.75 ± 0.11 |
| TP(g/kg) | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.61 ± 0.02 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 0.64 ± 0.08 | 0.9 ± 0.08 | 0.81 ± 0.07 | 0.87 ± 0.09 |
| TK(g/kg) | 12.41 ± 0.09 | 14.08 ± 0.15 | 13.82 ± 0.19 | 14.23 ± 0.42 | 13.05 ± 0.12 | 13.17 ± 0.15 | 12.89 ± 0.13 |
| TOC(g/kg) | 10.15 ± 0.26 | 15.24 ± 0.22 | 14.75 ± 0.13 | 15.31 ± 0.25 | 12.63 ± 0.22 | 13.05 ± 0.17 | 12.92 ± 0.15 |
TN: total azotes, TOC: total organic carbon, TP: total Phosphorus, TK: total potassium.
The enzyme activities measured.
| Enzymes | Phosphatase (μg pNP g−1) | β-Glucosidase (μg pNP g−1) | Urease (μg N-NH g−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers | R | 88.5 | 41.4 | 52 |
| CM1 | 447.0 | 92.0 | 31.6 | |
| CM2 | 719.4 | 121.1 | 36.2 | |
| CM3 | 483.2 | 89.5 | 32.8 | |
| PM1 | 402.5 | 62.0 | 40.1 | |
| PM2 | 413.6 | 76.3 | 44.0 | |
| PM3 | 389.0 | 75.0 | 42.5 | |
Figure 1DGGE banding profiles of 16S rRNA genes of different soil samples (R: reference; PM: soils amended by poultry manure; CM: soils amended by cow manure).
Shannon index of general diversity (H’) and Simpson index of dominance (D).
| R | CM1 | CM2 | CM3 | PM1 | PM2 | PM3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H′ | 1.08 | 2.114 | 2.088 | 2.109 | 1.255 | 1.223 | 1.241 |
| D | 0.198 | 0.103 | 0.97 | 0.108 | 0.189 | 0.198 | 0.191 |
Partial sequence analysis of bacterial 16S rDNA genes recovered from soil under application of cow and poultry manure.
| Band number | Name | Accession no. | % Similarity | Phylogeny | Order | Samples assigned soil |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJ457206 | 98 | Bacteroidetes | Flavobacteriales | CM | |
| 2 | AB 009936 | 99 | Firmicutes | Bacillales | CM & PM | |
| 3 | AJ577283 | 100 | Firmicutes | Bacillales | CM | |
| 4 | AJ271009 | 96 | Bacteroidete | Flavobacteriales | CM & PM | |
| 5 | AF493694 | 97 | Bacteroidetes | Flavobacteriales | CM | |
| 6 | Uncultured Firmicutes bacterium clone | EU297149.1 | 97 | Firmicutes | - | CM |
| 7 | AF275715 | 99 | Firmicutes | Bacillales | CM | |
| 8 | AJ318890 | 98 | Firmicutes | Clostridiales | PM | |
| 9 | KJ765661 | 98 | Firmicutes | Bacillales | CM | |
| 10 | AB 001836 | 99 | Firmicutes | Lactobacillales | CM | |
| 11 | KF965279 | 98 | γ-Proteobacteria | Pseudomonadales | PM | |
| 12 | X85101 | 99 | Firmicutes | Clostridiales | PM | |
| 13 | D83373 | 99 | Firmicutes | Bacillales | PM | |
| 14 | FJ665501 | 99 | γ-Proteobacteria | Pseudomonadales | PM | |
| 15 | AJ252602 | 98 | Bacteroidetes | Sphingobacteriales | R & CM | |
| 16 | EU095646 | 99 | Firmicutes | Bacillales | PM | |
| 17 | Uncultured Campylobacter sp. | KR848846 | 98 | γ-Proteobacteria | Campylobacterales | R & CM |
| 18 | L34618 | 99 | Firmicutes | Clostridiales | CM & PM | |
| 19 | Uncultured Arthrobacter sp. clone | VE34 | 97 | Actinobacteria | Micrococcales | R |
Figure 2Cluster analysis of DGGE banding profiles.