Literature DB >> 17704369

Spatial shifts in microbial population structure within poultry litter associated with physicochemical properties.

N Lovanh1, K L Cook, M J Rothrock, D M Miles, K Sistani.   

Abstract

Microbial populations within poultry litter have been largely ignored with the exception of potential human or livestock pathogens. A better understanding of the community structure and identity of the microbial populations within poultry litter could aid in the development of management practices that would reduce populations responsible for toxic air emissions and pathogen incidence. In this study, poultry litter air and physical properties were correlated to shifts in microbial community structure as analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) and measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Litter samples were taken in a 36-point grid pattern at 5 m across and 12 m down a 146 m x 12.8 m chicken house. At each sample point, physical parameters such as litter moisture, pH, air and litter temperature, and relative humidity were recorded, and samples were taken for molecular analysis. The DGGE analysis showed that the banding pattern of samples from the back and water/feeder areas of poultry house were distinct from those of samples from other areas. There were distinct clusters of banding patterns corresponding to the front, middle front, middle back, back, and waterer/feeder areas. The PCA analysis showed similar cluster patterns, but with more distinct separation of the front and midhouse samples. The PCA analysis also showed that moisture content and litter temperature (accounting for 51.5 and 31.5% of the separation of samples, respectively) play a major role in spatial diversity of microbial community in the poultry house. Based on analysis of DGGE fingerprints and cloned DGGE band sequences, there appear to be differences in the types of microorganisms over the length of the house, which correspond to differences in the physical properties of the litter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17704369     DOI: 10.1093/ps/86.9.1840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  13 in total

1.  A hybrid DNA extraction method for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of bacterial communities from poultry production samples.

Authors:  Michael J Rothrock; Kelli L Hiett; John Gamble; Andrew C Caudill; Kellie M Cicconi-Hogan; J Gregory Caporaso
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Interrelations between the microbiotas in the litter and in the intestines of commercial broiler chickens.

Authors:  Michael D Cressman; Zhongtang Yu; Michael C Nelson; Steven J Moeller; Michael S Lilburn; Henry N Zerby
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Longitudinal Changes in Campylobacter and the Litter Microbiome throughout the Broiler Production Cycle.

Authors:  Robert Valeris-Chacin; Bonnie Weber; Timothy J Johnson; Maria Pieters; Randall S Singer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 5.005

4.  Impacts of poultry house environment on poultry litter bacterial community composition.

Authors:  Michael D Dumas; Shawn W Polson; Don Ritter; Jacques Ravel; Jack Gelb; Robin Morgan; K Eric Wommack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Intestinal Microbiota of Broiler Chickens As Affected by Litter Management Regimens.

Authors:  Lingling Wang; Mike Lilburn; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Differences in cecal microbiome of selected high and low feather-pecking laying hens.

Authors:  P Birkl; A Bharwani; J B Kjaer; W Kunze; P McBride; P Forsythe; A Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Effect of Litter Treatment on Campylobacter jejuni in Broilers and on Cecal Microbiota.

Authors:  Amandine Thépault; Xavier Roulleau; Pauline Loiseau; Laurent Cauquil; Typhaine Poezevara; Bertrand Hyronimus; Ségolène Quesne; Florent Souchaud; Alassane Keita; Marianne Chemaly; Muriel Guyard-Nicodème
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-04-29

8.  Grape microbiome as a reliable and persistent signature of field origin and environmental conditions in Cannonau wine production.

Authors:  Valerio Mezzasalma; Anna Sandionigi; Ilaria Bruni; Antonia Bruno; Gianni Lovicu; Maurizio Casiraghi; Massimo Labra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of fertilization by natural manure on the microbial quality of soil: Molecular approach.

Authors:  Aziz Faissal; N Ouazzani; J R Parrado; M Dary; H Manyani; B R Morgado; M D Barragán; L Mandi
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Hotspot mutations and ColE1 plasmids contribute to the fitness of Salmonella Heidelberg in poultry litter.

Authors:  Adelumola Oladeinde; Kimberly Cook; Alex Orlek; Greg Zock; Kyler Herrington; Nelson Cox; Jodie Plumblee Lawrence; Carolina Hall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.