| Literature DB >> 28855690 |
Jianfeng Hua1,2, Youzhi Feng2, Qian Jiang2, Xuewen Bao3, Yunlong Yin1.
Abstract
Tideland reclamation has drastic effects on coastal ecosystem involved in soil microorganisms. However, the knowledge regarding temporal variations of microbial community along reclamation chronosequence and their environmental variable predictor is still poorly known. Using Illumina sequencing, we qualified bacterial community composition in soils collected from one tideland and four reclamation stages, i.e. 2-year, 7-year, 19-year and 39-year in Jiangsu, Eastern China. Across all samples, the dominant groups were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidete, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes and Chloroflexi. Reclamation activity and its histories greatly altered bacterial community structure, and only 0.28% of phylotypes were shared by five soils. Specially, some typical marine bacteria (Gaetulibacter, Alcanivorax …) disappeared in reclamation soils, while other groups (Niabella, Flavisolibacter…) were gradually eminent. Generally, bacterial diversity and richness increased with reclamation histories. Bacterial community was correlated with most of soil physico-chemical properties. Amongst, mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (MWD) was detected as a primary factor predicting bacterial community composition. Together, our results indicated that effects of reclamation on bacterial community varied with diked histories, and MWD was a major factor predicting bacterial community during progressive reclamation. These findings offer predicting case study for understanding the impact of reclamation and its histories on microbial community in a coastal ecosystem.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28855690 PMCID: PMC5577240 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10608-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Soil physical properties at five sampling sites.
| Sites | BD (g cm−3) | MWD (mm) | Aggregate size distribution (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | MAA | MIA | SC | |||
| Native | 1.42 ± 0.06a | 3.51 ± 0.03d | — | 0.26 ± 0.17c | 5.66 ± 1.05c | 94.1 ± 0.88a |
| 2-year | 1.37 ± 0.05ab | 4.52 ± 0.81cd | — | 1.32 ± 1.19c | 8.66 ± 2.25bc | 90.0 ± 2.71ab |
| 7-year | 1.36 ± 0.01ab | 6.37 ± 0.87c | — | 1.65 ± 1.03bc | 21.9 ± 2.52b | 76.5 ± 3.32b |
| 19-year | 1.33 ± 0.10ab | 14.1 ± 2.33b | 1.80 ± 0.29a | 3.02 ± 0.92b | 41.8 ± 15.51a | 53.4 ± 15.5c |
| 39-year | 1.29 ± 0.04b | 16.4 ± 0.77a | 0.85 ± 0.38b | 9.47 ± 0.25a | 49.7 ± 5.26a | 39.9 ± 4.93c |
Data presented are means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Means followed by the different letters into each column are significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at 5% level. BD, soil bulk density; MWD, mean weight diameter of soil aggregates; LA, large aggregates (>1.0 mm); MAA, macroaggregates (1.0–0.25 mm), MIA, microaggregates (0.25–0.053 mm), SC, silt + clay fractions (<0.053 mm). —, not observed.
Soil chemical properties at five sampling sites.
| Sites | pH | TN (%) | OM (%) | C:N | AP (mg 100 g−1) | EC (ms cm−1) | Ca2+ (mg kg−1) | K+ (mg kg−1) | Mg2+ (mg kg−1) | Na+ (mg kg−1) | Cl− (mg kg−1) | SO4 2− (mg kg−1) | CO3 2− (mg kg−1) | HCO3 − (mg kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native | 8.39 ± 0.07b | 0.03 ± 0.00 cd | 0.49 ± 0.05b | 8.18 ± 0.65a | 0.62 ± 0.04b | 7.22 ± 1.43a | 302 ± 100a | 268 ± 24.6a | 438 ± 160a | 2955 ± 1337a | 6079 ± 3481a | 1276 ± 731a | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 123 ± 11.9c |
| 2-year | 8.55 ± 0.21b | 0.02 ± 0.00d | 0.26 ± 0.05b | 7.68 ± 0.42a | 0.41 ± 0.09b | 5.18 ± 3.40a | 166 ± 107b | 185 ± 75.1b | 338 ± 343a | 3008 ± 2385a | 5922 ± 5754a | 891 ± 661ab | 4.56 ± 1.32b | 122 ± 29.7c |
| 7-year | 9.08 ± 0.28a | 0.04 ± 0.01c | 0.35 ± 0.01b | 4.94 ± 0.96b | 0.34 ± 0.09b | 0.79 ± 0.49b | 31.3 ± 1.16 c | 62.8 ± 11.4c | 20.3 ± 0.63b | 809 ± 619ab | 782 ± 682ab | 219 ± 193bc | 36.9 ± 8.97a | 353 ± 47.2a |
| 19-year | 8.44 ± 0.06b | 0.12 ± 0.03a | 1.49 ± 0.48a | 6.90 ± 1.11a | 3.81 ± 2.63a | 0.11 ± 0.03b | 56.9 ± 5.33bc | 87.6 ± 35.2c | 9.02 ± 0.50b | 8.85 ± 1.53b | 10.7 ± 1.98b | 13.4 ± 2.23c | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 220 ± 20.9b |
| 39-year | 8.48 ± 0.11b | 0.08 ± 0.00b | 0.68 ± 0.06b | 4.89 ± 0.38b | 0.30 ± 0.08b | 0.08 ± 0.02b | 60.9 ± 10.4bc | 27.4 ± 9.87c | 4.83 ± 1.05b | 6.83 ± 2.76b | 12.3 ± 5.20b | 11.1 ± 5.18c | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 166 ± 2.84c |
Data presented are means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Means followed by the different letters into each column are significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at 5% level. TN, total nitrogen; OM, organic matter; AP, available phosphorus; EC, electric conductivity.
Figure 1A 100% stacked column chart of relative abundances of the dominant bacterial phyla (proteobacterial class) derived from 16 S rRNA genes at five sampling sites.
Figure 2Rarefaction curves of Phylogenetic Diversity index (A), Shannon index (B), Chao1 (C), and observed species (D) at five sampling sites.
Figure 3Bacterial community compositional structure in soils as indicated by a non-metric multi-dimensional scaling plot of the weighted pairwise UniFrac community distances between different soil samples.
Figure 4Change ratio of the relative abundance of dominant genera in four reclaimed soils relative to native tideland soil.
The spearman’s correlations (r) between soil properties and bacterial community structure (Braye-Curtis distance) determined by Mantel test.
| Soil properties |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| MWD | 0.709 | 0.001 |
| SC | 0.640 | 0.001 |
| MIA | 0.626 | 0.001 |
| EC | 0.557 | 0.001 |
| TN | 0.514 | 0.001 |
| Na+ | 0.498 | 0.001 |
| K+ | 0.492 | 0.001 |
| LA | 0.455 | 0.001 |
| SO4 2− | 0.447 | 0.001 |
| Mg2+ | 0.416 | 0.001 |
| Ca2+ | 0.401 | 0.001 |
| Cl− | 0.397 | 0.001 |
| HCO3 − | 0.367 | 0.001 |
| BD | 0.282 | 0.013 |
| MAA | 0.279 | 0.005 |
| CO3 2− | 0.278 | 0.001 |
| OM | 0.273 | 0.001 |
| C:N | 0.250 | 0.018 |
| pH | 0.204 | 0.008 |
| AP | 0.035 | 0.267 |
BD, soil bulk density; MWD, mean weight diameter of soil aggregates; LA, large aggregates (>1.0 mm); MAA, macroaggregates (1.0–0.25 mm); MIA, microaggregates (0.25–0.053 mm); SC, silt + clay fractions (<0.053 mm); TN, total nitrogen; OM, organic matter; AP, available phosphorus; EC, electric conductivity.
Figure 5Redundancy analysis (RDA) of bacterial community composition and soil variables for individual samples.
Relationship of soil variables with the bacterial community composition as revealed from distance-based regression analysis.
| Variance explained (%) |
| Variables in model |
|---|---|---|
| 25.44 | <0.001 | MWD |
| 12.63 | <0.001 | CO3 2− |
MWD, mean weight diameter of soil aggregates.