| Literature DB >> 28855618 |
Hillary Smith1,2,3,4, Hannah Epstein5,6,7,8, Gergely Torda5,6.
Abstract
Processes of cnidarian evolution, including hybridization and phenotypic plasticity, have complicated the clear diagnosis of species boundaries within the phylum. Pocillopora acuta, a species of scleractinian coral that was recently split from the widespread Pocillopora damicornis species complex, occurs in at least two distinct morphs on the Great Barrier Reef. Contrasting morphology combined with evidence of differential bleaching thresholds among sympatrically distributed colonies suggest that the taxonomy of this recently described species is not fully resolved and may represent its own species complex. To examine the basis of sympatric differentiation between the two morphs, we combined analyses of micro- and macro-skeletal morphology with genome wide sequencing of the coral host, as well as ITS2 genotyping of the associated Symbiodinium communities. We found consistent differences between morphs on both the macro- and micro-skeletal scale. In addition, we identified 18 candidate functional genes that relate to skeletal formation and morphology that may explain how the two morphs regulate growth to achieve their distinct growth forms. With inconclusive results in endosymbiotic algal community diversity between the two morphs, we propose that colony morphology may be linked to bleaching susceptibility. We conclude that cryptic speciation may be in the early stages within the species P. acuta.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28855618 PMCID: PMC5577224 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10560-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Overview of sample collection.
| Bleached | Not Bleached | Partially Bleached | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Chunky | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Fine | 22 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
|
| ||||
| Chunky | 0 | 16 | 1 | 17 |
| Fine | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
|
| ||||
| Chunky | 0 | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| Fine | 10 | 0 | 9 | 19 |
Figure 1Chunky and fine morphs had distinct peaks in a DAPC analysis based on neutral loci, but still overlapped considerably.
Figure 2STRUCTURE bar plots depicting clustering results for chunky and fine morphotypes based on neutral loci and outlier loci, respectively. Each bar in the graphs represents an individual, with the colors representing proportional cluster membership to each of the identified clusters.
Figure 3Clustering of multivariate Symbiodinium community composition data clouds in each coral sample visualized using non-parametric multidimensional scaling (nMDS).
Figure 4(a) nMDS plot of microskeletal features. Points represent the multivariate position of each corallite measured. (b) nMDS plot of macroskeletal features. Points represent branches measured.
Figure 5(a) Photos of “type” specimens for each morphotype; photo 1 is chunky morphotype, photo 2 is fine morphotype. (b) Box plots of nine macroskeletal variables. Colors indicate morphotypes (orange: chunky; blue: fine); all Y-axes are in millimetres. Plots B1-B9 represent morphometric variables[27] (Supplementary Table S1).
Figure 6(a) Box plots of four microskeletal variables. Colors indicate morphotypes (orange: chunky; blue: fine). (b) Scanning electron microscope photos of characteristic corallites for each morphotype.
Figure 7Map of collection locations. Map generated in ESRI ArcMap version 10.4.1 (http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/).