Literature DB >> 28849317

Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images.

Amir Faisal1, Siew-Cheok Ng1, Siew-Li Goh2, Khin Wee Lai3.   

Abstract

Quantitative thickness computation of knee cartilage in ultrasound images requires segmentation of a monotonous hypoechoic band between the soft tissue-cartilage interface and the cartilage-bone interface. Speckle noise and intensity bias captured in the ultrasound images often complicates the segmentation task. This paper presents knee cartilage segmentation using locally statistical level set method (LSLSM) and thickness computation using normal distance. Comparison on several level set methods in the attempt of segmenting the knee cartilage shows that LSLSM yields a more satisfactory result. When LSLSM was applied to 80 datasets, the qualitative segmentation assessment indicates a substantial agreement with Cohen's κ coefficient of 0.73. The quantitative validation metrics of Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance have average values of 0.91 ± 0.01 and 6.21 ± 0.59 pixels, respectively. These satisfactory segmentation results are making the true thickness between two interfaces of the cartilage possible to be computed based on the segmented images. The measured cartilage thickness ranged from 1.35 to 2.42 mm with an average value of 1.97 ± 0.11 mm, reflecting the robustness of the segmentation algorithm to various cartilage thickness. These results indicate a potential application of the methods described for assessment of cartilage degeneration where changes in the cartilage thickness can be quantified over time by comparing the true thickness at a certain time interval.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage; Image segmentation; Knee joint; Level set; Thickness computation; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28849317     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1710-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  24 in total

1.  LOGISMOS--layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces: cartilage segmentation in the knee joint.

Authors:  Yin Yin; Xiangmin Zhang; Rachel Williams; Xiaodong Wu; Donald D Anderson; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Shape-intensity prior level set combining probabilistic atlas and probability map constrains for automatic liver segmentation from abdominal CT images.

Authors:  Jinke Wang; Yuanzhi Cheng; Changyong Guo; Yadong Wang; Shinichi Tamura
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 3.  Ultrasound in the study and monitoring of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  I Möller; D Bong; E Naredo; E Filippucci; I Carrasco; C Moragues; A Iagnocco
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  A Level Set Approach to Image Segmentation With Intensity Inhomogeneity.

Authors:  Kaihua Zhang; Lei Zhang; Kin-Man Lam; David Zhang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Cybern       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 11.448

5.  Segmenting articular cartilage automatically using a voxel classification approach.

Authors:  Jenny Folkesson; Erik B Dam; Ole F Olsen; Paola C Pettersen; Claus Christiansen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 6.  Advances in imaging of osteoarthritis and cartilage.

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; Michel D Crema; Siegfried Trattnig; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Automatic human knee cartilage segmentation from 3D magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Pierre Dodin; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; François Abram
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Sonographic evaluation of the cartilage of the knee.

Authors:  A M Aisen; W J McCune; A MacGuire; P L Carson; T M Silver; S Z Jafri; W Martel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Ultrasound validity in the measurement of knee cartilage thickness.

Authors:  E Naredo; C Acebes; I Möller; F Canillas; J J de Agustín; E de Miguel; E Filippucci; A Iagnocco; C Moragues; R Tuneu; J Uson; J Garrido; E Delgado-Baeza; I Sáenz-Navarro
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters.

Authors:  Heiko Graichen; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Thomas Vogl; Karl-Hans Englmeier; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  Variation in the Thickness of Knee Cartilage. The Use of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Cartilage Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Romil F Shah; Alejandro M Martinez; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas P Vail; Stefano A Bini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Emerging Feature Extraction Techniques for Machine Learning-Based Classification of Carotid Artery Ultrasound Images.

Authors:  S Latha; P Muthu; Samiappan Dhanalakshmi; R Kumar; Khin Wee Lai; Xiang Wu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Multistage Optimization Using a Modified Gaussian Mixture Model in Sperm Motility Tracking.

Authors:  Mohammed Alameri; Khairunnisa Hasikin; Nahrizul Adib Kadri; Nashrul Fazli Mohd Nasir; Prabu Mohandas; Jerline Sheeba Anni; Muhammad Mokhzaini Azizan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 4.  Discovering Knee Osteoarthritis Imaging Features for Diagnosis and Prognosis: Review of Manual Imaging Grading and Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Yun Xin Teoh; Khin Wee Lai; Juliana Usman; Siew Li Goh; Hamidreza Mohafez; Khairunnisa Hasikin; Pengjiang Qian; Yizhang Jiang; Yuanpeng Zhang; Samiappan Dhanalakshmi
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Construction of a Diagnostic Model for Lymph Node Metastasis of the Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Using Preoperative Ultrasound Features and Imaging Omics.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Lihua Cheng; Weiwen Zhu; Jian Zhuang; Tong Zhao; Xiaoqin Li; Wenfeng Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 6.  Developing a toolkit for the assessment and monitoring of musculoskeletal ageing.

Authors:  Graham J Kemp; Fraser Birrell; Peter D Clegg; Daniel J Cuthbertson; Giuseppe De Vito; Jaap H van Dieën; Silvia Del Din; Richard Eastell; Patrick Garnero; Katarzyna Goljanek-Whysall; Matthias Hackl; Richard Hodgson; Malcolm J Jackson; Sue Lord; Claudia Mazzà; Anne McArdle; Eugene V McCloskey; Marco Narici; Mandy J Peffers; Stefano Schiaffino; John C Mathers
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  YiRang Shin; Jaemoon Yang; Young Han Lee; Sungjun Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-09-06

8.  Development and External Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Stomach Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Haonan Ji; Huita Wu; Yu Du; Li Xiao; Yiqin Zhang; Qiuhua Zhang; Xin Wang; Wenfeng Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Three-dimensional ultrasound for knee osteophyte depiction: a comparative study to computed tomography.

Authors:  Valeria Vendries; Tamas Ungi; Jordan Harry; Manuela Kunz; Jana Podlipská; Les MacKenzie; Gabriel Venne
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Comparative Study of Encoder-decoder-based Convolutional Neural Networks in Cartilage Delineation from Knee Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Ching Wai Yong; Khin Wee Lai; Belinda Pingguan Murphy; Yan Chai Hum
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging       Date:  2021
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.