Literature DB >> 20639173

Automatic human knee cartilage segmentation from 3D magnetic resonance images.

Pierre Dodin, Jean-Pierre Pelletier, Johanne Martel-Pelletier, François Abram.   

Abstract

This study aimed at developing a new automatic segmentation algorithm for human knee cartilage volume quantification from magnetic resonance images (MRI). Imaging was performed using a 3T scanner and a knee coil, and the exam consisted of a DESS sequence which contrasts cartilage and soft tissues including the synovial fluid. The algorithm was developed on MRI 3D images in which the bone-cartilage interface for the femur and tibia was segmented by an independent segmentation process, giving a parametric surface of the interface. Firstly, the MR images are resampled in the neighborhood of the bone surface. Secondly, by using texture analysis techniques optimized by filtering, the cartilage is discriminated as a bright and homogeneous tissue. This process of excluding soft tissues enables the detection of the external boundary of the cartilage. Thirdly, a technology based on a Bayesian decision criterion enables the automatic separation of the cartilage and synovial fluid. Finally, the cartilage volume and changes in volume for an individual between visits was assessed using the developed technology. Validation included first, for nine knee osteoarthritis patients, a comparison of the cartilage volume and changes over time between the developed automatic system and a validated semi-automatic cartilage volume system, and second, for five knee osteoarthritis patients, a test-retest procedure. Data revealed excellent Pearson correlations and Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) for the global knee (r=0.96, p<0.0001, median DSC=0.84), for the femur (r=0.95, p<0.0001, median DSC=0.85) and the tibia (r=0.83, p<0.0001, median DSC=0.84). Very good similarity between the automatic and semi-automatic methods in regard to cartilage loss was also found for the global knee (r=0.76, p=0.016) as well as for the femur (r=0.79, p=0.011). The test-retest revealed an excellent measurement error of -0.3?1.6% for the global knee and 0.14?1.7% for the femur. In conclusion, the newly developed fully automatic method described herein provides accurate and precise quantification of knee cartilage volume and will be a valuable tool for clinical follow-up studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20639173     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2058112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  24 in total

1.  Structure-enhanced local phase filtering using L0 gradient minimization for efficient semiautomated knee magnetic resonance imaging segmentation.

Authors:  Mikhiel Lim; Ilker Hacihaliloglu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-02

2.  Automatic atlas-based three-label cartilage segmentation from MR knee images.

Authors:  Liang Shan; Christopher Zach; Cecil Charles; Marc Niethammer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images.

Authors:  Amir Faisal; Siew-Cheok Ng; Siew-Li Goh; Khin Wee Lai
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  The effect of alignment on knee osteoarthritis initiation and progression differs based on anterior cruciate ligament status: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Shawn M Robbins; Nicolas Raymond; François Abram; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Johanne Martel-Pelletier
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Fully automated segmentation of cartilage from the MR images of knee using a multi-atlas and local structural analysis method.

Authors:  June-Goo Lee; Serter Gumus; Chan Hong Moon; C Kent Kwoh; Kyongtae Ty Bae
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers: the application of advanced image processing and analysis to clinical and preclinical decision making.

Authors:  Jeffrey William Prescott
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  A Machine Learning Model to Predict Knee Osteoarthritis Cartilage Volume Changes over Time Using Baseline Bone Curvature.

Authors:  Hossein Bonakdari; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; François Abram; Johanne Martel-Pelletier
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-26

8.  Fully automatic analysis of the knee articular cartilage T1ρ relaxation time using voxel-based relaxometry.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Xiaojuan Li; Favian Su; Nathaniel Calixto; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Knee effusion volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and progression of knee osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Andrew J Teichtahl; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; François Abram; Anita E Wluka; Sultana Monira Hussain; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  Cartilage Topography Assessment With Local-Area Cartilage Segmentation for Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Alexander Mathiessen; Erin L Ashbeck; Emily Huang; Edward John Bedrick; C Kent Kwoh; Jeffrey Duryea
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.178

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.