Literature DB >> 28847817

Reading chromatin signatures after DNA double-strand breaks.

Marcus D Wilson1, Daniel Durocher2,3.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are DNA lesions that must be accurately repaired in order to preserve genomic integrity and cellular viability. The response to DSBs reshapes the local chromatin environment and is largely orchestrated by the deposition, removal and detection of a complex set of chromatin-associated post-translational modifications. In particular, the nucleosome acts as a central signalling hub and landing platform in this process by organizing the recruitment of repair and signalling factors, while at the same time coordinating repair with other DNA-based cellular processes. While current research has provided a descriptive overview of which histone marks affect DSB repair, we are only beginning to understand how these marks are interpreted to foster an efficient DSB response. Here we review how the modified chromatin surrounding DSBs is read, with a focus on the insights gleaned from structural and biochemical studies.This article is part of the themed issue 'Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA double-strand breaks; DNA repair; chromatin; nucleosome; post-translational modification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28847817      PMCID: PMC5577458          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  202 in total

1.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.

Authors:  K Luger; A W Mäder; R K Richmond; D F Sargent; T J Richmond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Fine-tuning of DNA damage-dependent ubiquitination by OTUB2 supports the DNA repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Kiyoko Kato; Kazuhiro Nakajima; Ayako Ui; Yuri Muto-Terao; Hideaki Ogiwara; Shinichiro Nakada
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  RNF4 interacts with both SUMO and nucleosomes to promote the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Lynda M Groocock; Minghua Nie; John Prudden; Davide Moiani; Tao Wang; Anton Cheltsov; Robert P Rambo; Andrew S Arvai; Chiharu Hitomi; John A Tainer; Karolin Luger; J Jefferson P Perry; Eros Lazzerini-Denchi; Michael N Boddy
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  53BP1 fosters fidelity of homology-directed DNA repair.

Authors:  Fena Ochs; Kumar Somyajit; Matthias Altmeyer; Maj-Britt Rask; Jiri Lukas; Claudia Lukas
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  RNF8 E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Stimulates Ubc13 E2 Conjugating Activity That Is Essential for DNA Double Strand Break Signaling and BRCA1 Tumor Suppressor Recruitment.

Authors:  Curtis D Hodge; Ismail H Ismail; Ross A Edwards; Greg L Hura; Andrew T Xiao; John A Tainer; Michael J Hendzel; J N Mark Glover
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Factors forming the BRCA1-A complex orchestrate BRCA1 recruitment to the sites of DNA damage.

Authors:  Joonyoung Her; Nam Soo Lee; Yonghwan Kim; Hongtae Kim
Journal:  Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.848

7.  The structural basis of modified nucleosome recognition by 53BP1.

Authors:  Marcus D Wilson; Samir Benlekbir; Amélie Fradet-Turcotte; Alana Sherker; Jean-Philippe Julien; Andrea McEwan; Sylvie M Noordermeer; Frank Sicheri; John L Rubinstein; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells.

Authors:  Alexandre Orthwein; Sylvie M Noordermeer; Marcus D Wilson; Sébastien Landry; Radoslav I Enchev; Alana Sherker; Meagan Munro; Jordan Pinder; Jayme Salsman; Graham Dellaire; Bing Xia; Matthias Peter; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Impact of histone H4 lysine 20 methylation on 53BP1 responses to chromosomal double strand breaks.

Authors:  Andrea J Hartlerode; Yinghua Guan; Anbazhagan Rajendran; Kiyoe Ura; Gunnar Schotta; Anyong Xie; Jagesh V Shah; Ralph Scully
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Phosphorylation of histone H2B at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; C David Allis; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Genome maintenance functions of the INO80 chromatin remodeller.

Authors:  Ashby J Morrison
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The tale of a tail: histone H4 acetylation and the repair of DNA breaks.

Authors:  Surbhi Dhar; Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu; Ramya Parasuram; Brendan D Price
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling.

Authors:  Penny A Jeggo; Jessica A Downs; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Transcription-associated events affecting genomic integrity.

Authors:  Robin Sebastian; Philipp Oberdoerffer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  An unorthodox partnership in DNA repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Dimitris Typas; Niels Mailand
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein targets RNF168 to hijack the host DNA damage response.

Authors:  Justine Sitz; Sophie Anne Blanchet; Steven F Gameiro; Elise Biquand; Tia M Morgan; Maxime Galloy; Julien Dessapt; Elise G Lavoie; Andréanne Blondeau; Brandon C Smith; Joe S Mymryk; Cary A Moody; Amélie Fradet-Turcotte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phospho-dependent recruitment of the yeast NuA4 acetyltransferase complex by MRX at DNA breaks regulates RPA dynamics during resection.

Authors:  Xue Cheng; Olivier Jobin-Robitaille; Pierre Billon; Rémi Buisson; Hengyao Niu; Nicolas Lacoste; Nebiyu Abshiru; Valérie Côté; Pierre Thibault; Stephen J Kron; Patrick Sung; Christopher J Brandl; Jean-Yves Masson; Jacques Côté
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The Ubiquitin E3/E4 Ligase UBE4A Adjusts Protein Ubiquitylation and Accumulation at Sites of DNA Damage, Facilitating Double-Strand Break Repair.

Authors:  Keren Baranes-Bachar; Adva Levy-Barda; Judith Oehler; Dylan A Reid; Isabel Soria-Bretones; Ty C Voss; Dudley Chung; Yoon Park; Chao Liu; Jong-Bok Yoon; Wei Li; Graham Dellaire; Tom Misteli; Pablo Huertas; Eli Rothenberg; Kristijan Ramadan; Yael Ziv; Yosef Shiloh
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 9.  Fluorescence Sheds Light on DNA Damage, DNA Repair, and Mutations.

Authors:  Norah A Owiti; Zachary D Nagel; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-11-14

10.  Doxorubicin induces an alarmin-like TLR4-dependent autocrine/paracrine action of Nucleophosmin in human cardiac mesenchymal progenitor cells.

Authors:  Sara Beji; Marco D'Agostino; Elisa Gambini; Daniele Avitabile; Alessandra Magenta; Sara Sileno; Alessandro Scopece; Maria Cristina Vinci; Giuseppina Milano; Guido Melillo; Monica Napolitano; Giulio Pompilio; Maurizio C Capogrossi
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.