Literature DB >> 28847623

Accuracy and reproducibility of the DAVID SLS-2 scanner in three-dimensional facial imaging.

Jesper Jared Secher1, Tron Andre Darvann2, Else Marie Pinholt3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective study was performed to test the accuracy and reproducibility of the DAVID-SLS-2 scanner (SLS-2) [DAVID Vision Systems GmbH], compared to the validated 3dMDtrio scanner (3dMD) [3dMD, LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA].
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The accuracy of the SLS-2 was determined through multiple scans of a mannequin face model using both scanners. The reproducibility of a protocol for achieving consistent three-dimensional (3D) face scans in live subjects was carried out using the SLS-2. A precision of ≤1 mm was considered clinically significant.
RESULTS: The mannequin face model was reproduced with no significant errors in the SLS-2 compared to the 3dMDtrio, with normally distributed data (mean = 0.002 mm; SD = 0.01 mm). In live subjects, the forehead, midface, chin and general face region showed mean errors and SD <0.24 mm and <1 mm, respectively. In the neck area, the data were not found to be normally distributed (mean = -1.6 mm; SD = 2.1 mm).
CONCLUSION: Structured light scanning may be used for acquiring 3D face scans in live subjects in a radiation-free and reproducible manner, provided that the head of the subject is positioned in the same posture for each scan. Special care is recommended in positioning the head in the sagittal plane during scanning.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D photogrammetry; Accuracy; Reproducibility; Structured light scanning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28847623     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  7 in total

1.  Quantification of aortic valve area: comparison of different methods of echocardiography with 3-D scan of the excised valve.

Authors:  Samira Shirazi; Fatemeh Golmohammadi; Anahita Tavoosi; Mehrdad Salehi; Farnoosh Larti; Akram Sardari; Babak Geraiely; Mehrzad Rahmanian; Kianoush Saberi; Roya Sattarzadeh Badkoubeh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  [Comparison of the registration methods for the three-dimensional facial scans applied to the design of full-arch implant supported restoration].

Authors:  D N Guo; S X Pan; M D Heng; J Qu; X X Wei; Y S Zhou
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-24

3.  A comparison between stereophotogrammetry and smartphone structured light technology for three-dimensional face scanning.

Authors:  Giorgio D'Ettorre; Marco Farronato; Ettore Candida; Vincenzo Quinzi; Cristina Grippaudo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.684

4.  Scan time, reliability and accuracy of craniofacial measurements using a 3D light scanner.

Authors:  Camilla Franco de Sá Gomes; Mylena Ranieri Libdy; David Normando
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-07-07

5.  Accuracy of Portable Face-Scanning Devices for Obtaining Three-Dimensional Face Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hang-Nga Mai; Jaeil Kim; Youn-Hee Choi; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Accuracy of Mobile Device-Compatible 3D Scanners for Facial Digitization: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hang-Nga Mai; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  A Comparative Study between Scanning Devices for 3D Printing of Personalized Ostomy Patches.

Authors:  Sofia Zahia; Begonya Garcia-Zapirain; Jon Anakabe; Joan Ander; Oscar Jossa Bastidas; Alberto Loizate Totoricagüena
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.