Literature DB >> 33375533

Accuracy of Portable Face-Scanning Devices for Obtaining Three-Dimensional Face Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hang-Nga Mai1, Jaeil Kim2, Youn-Hee Choi1,3, Du-Hyeong Lee1,4.   

Abstract

The use of three-dimensional face-scanning systems to obtain facial models is of increasing interest, however, systematic assessments of the reliability of portable face-scan devices have not been widely conducted. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed considering the accuracy of facial models obtained by portable face-scanners in comparison with that of those obtained by stationary face-scanning systems. A systematic literature search was conducted in electronic databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for articles published from 1 January 2009 to 18 March 2020. A total of 2806 articles were identified, with 21 articles available for the narrative review and nine studies available for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that the accuracy of the digital face models generated by the portable scanners was not significantly different from that of the stationary face-scanning systems (standard mean difference (95% confidence interval) = -0.325 mm (-1.186 to 0.536); z = -0.74; p = 0.459). Within the comparison of the portable systems, no statistically significant difference was found concerning the accuracy of the facial models among scanning methods (p = 0.063). Overall, portable face-scan devices can be considered reliable for obtaining facial models. However, caution is needed when applying face-scanners with respect to scanning device settings, control of involuntary facial movements, landmark and facial region identifications, and scanning protocols.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; meta-analysis; portable facial scanning; systematic review; three-dimensional face model

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33375533      PMCID: PMC7795319          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  52 in total

Review 1.  Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review.

Authors:  Joanneke M Plooij; Thomas J J Maal; Piet Haers; Wilfred A Borstlap; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Stefaan J Bergé
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Three-dimensional surface models of the facial soft tissues acquired with a low-cost scanner.

Authors:  C P R Maués; M V S Casagrande; R C C Almeida; M A O Almeida; F A R Carvalho
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Comparison of three-dimensional scanner systems for craniomaxillofacial imaging.

Authors:  Paul G M Knoops; Caroline A A Beaumont; Alessandro Borghi; Naiara Rodriguez-Florez; Richard W F Breakey; William Rodgers; Freida Angullia; N U Owase Jeelani; Silvia Schievano; David J Dunaway
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a mobile and a stationary system for three-dimensional facial scanning.

Authors:  Ali Modabber; Florian Peters; Kristian Kniha; Evgeny Goloborodko; Alireza Ghassemi; Bernd Lethaus; Frank Hölzle; Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Reliability of optical devices for three-dimensional facial anatomy description: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Gibelli; C Dolci; A Cappella; C Sforza
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Context-guided fully convolutional networks for joint craniomaxillofacial bone segmentation and landmark digitization.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mingxia Liu; Li Wang; Si Chen; Peng Yuan; Jianfu Li; Steve Guo-Fang Shen; Zhen Tang; Ken-Chung Chen; James J Xia; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Optical Sensors and Methods for Underwater 3D Reconstruction.

Authors:  Miquel Massot-Campos; Gabriel Oliver-Codina
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Perceptions of Dentists and Non-Professionals on Some Dental Factors Affecting Smile Aesthetics: A Study from Vietnam.

Authors:  Vo Truong Nhu Ngoc; Dang-Khoa Tran; Truong Manh Dung; Nguyen Viet Anh; Vu Thi Nga; Le Quynh Anh; Nguyen Thi Thuy Hanh; Linh Nguyen Phuong; Hoang Ngoc Quynh; Dinh-Toi Chu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Craniofacial Asymmetry from One to Three Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study with 3D Imaging.

Authors:  Anniina M Launonen; Ville Vuollo; Henri Aarnivala; Tuomo Heikkinen; Pertti Pirttiniemi; A Marita Valkama; Virpi Harila
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  2 in total

1.  Integration of imaging modalities in digital dental workflows - possibilities, limitations, and potential future developments.

Authors:  Sohaib Shujaat; Michael M Bornstein; Jeffery B Price; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Workflow to develop 3D designed personalized neonatal CPAP masks using iPhone structured light facial scanning.

Authors:  Amika A Kamath; Marielle J Kamath; Selin Ekici; Anna Sofia Stans; Christopher E Colby; Jane M Matsumoto; Mark E Wylam
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2022-08-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.