BACKGROUND: Chronic stress and related physiological responses are known to have deleterious effects on neural integrity. Combat exposure is a notoriously pathogenic stressor and with over 2 million U.S. troops deployed to active combat zones since 2001, there is an urgent need to advance our understanding of its potential neural impact. Previous evidence suggests structural alterations in PTSD and more recent studies have explored cortical thinning specifically. This preliminary study investigates the impact of combat exposure on cortical thickness, controlling for history of early life stress and age. METHODS: Twenty-one combat-exposed Veterans with PTSD and 20 non-PTSD combat-exposed controls (mean age 32.7) completed the Combat Exposure Scale, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and structural magnetic resonance imaging in a Siemens 3T TIM trio system. GLM was used to examine the effect of combat exposure on cortical thickness, controlling for early life trauma exposure and age using cluster-wise correction (p<0.05). RESULTS: This preliminary study found a negative correlation between combat exposure severity (CES) and cortical thickness in the left superior temporal and left rostral middle frontal regions, as well as an interaction between PTSD diagnosis status and CES, in the superior temporal/insular region showing a stronger negative correlation between CES and cortical thickness in the non-PTSD group. CONCLUSIONS: Though caution should be taken with interpretation given the preliminary nature of the findings, the results indicate combat exposure may affect cortical structure beyond possible alterations due to early life stress exposure or PTSD psychopathology. Though replication in larger samples is required, these results provide useful information regarding possible neural biomarkers and treatment targets for combat-related psychopathology as well as highlighting the pathogenic effects of combat.
BACKGROUND:Chronic stress and related physiological responses are known to have deleterious effects on neural integrity. Combat exposure is a notoriously pathogenic stressor and with over 2 million U.S. troops deployed to active combat zones since 2001, there is an urgent need to advance our understanding of its potential neural impact. Previous evidence suggests structural alterations in PTSD and more recent studies have explored cortical thinning specifically. This preliminary study investigates the impact of combat exposure on cortical thickness, controlling for history of early life stress and age. METHODS: Twenty-one combat-exposed Veterans with PTSD and 20 non-PTSD combat-exposed controls (mean age 32.7) completed the Combat Exposure Scale, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and structural magnetic resonance imaging in a Siemens 3T TIM trio system. GLM was used to examine the effect of combat exposure on cortical thickness, controlling for early life trauma exposure and age using cluster-wise correction (p<0.05). RESULTS: This preliminary study found a negative correlation between combat exposure severity (CES) and cortical thickness in the left superior temporal and left rostral middle frontal regions, as well as an interaction between PTSD diagnosis status and CES, in the superior temporal/insular region showing a stronger negative correlation between CES and cortical thickness in the non-PTSD group. CONCLUSIONS: Though caution should be taken with interpretation given the preliminary nature of the findings, the results indicate combat exposure may affect cortical structure beyond possible alterations due to early life stress exposure or PTSD psychopathology. Though replication in larger samples is required, these results provide useful information regarding possible neural biomarkers and treatment targets for combat-related psychopathology as well as highlighting the pathogenic effects of combat.
Entities:
Keywords:
PTSD; childhood trauma; combat; cortical thickness; early life stress; structural neuroimaging; veteran
Combat exposure is a notoriously pathogenic stressor that often precipitates the
onset or worsening of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a stress-related
psychiatric disorder characterized by reexperiencing, emotional and behavioral
avoidance, negative cognitions and mood, and hyperarousal symptoms.[1] The prevalence of PTSD among combat-exposed Veterans worldwide is as high as
25%, depending on service era.[2,3] Over 2 million U.S. troops, and
millions more from across the globe, have been deployed to active combat zones since
2001 creating unprecedented need to advance our understanding of the potential
neurobiological consequences associated with war and combat exposure and to
investigate potential treatment targets to inform novel drug development.Preclinical and clinical research has demonstrated the negative effects of chronic
stress and related physiological responses on neural tissue integrity, structural
remodeling, and volumetric changes.[4-9] Converging evidence shows that
trauma and stress-induced impairment in glutamate release and glial reuptake
precipitate excitotoxic levels of extrasynaptic glutamate, which contribute to the
development and maintenance of the pathophysiology of stress-related disorders, such
as PTSD, major depression, and generalized anxiety.[9-11] These stress-induced neuronal
atrophy changes include reduction in dendritic arborization and spine density, as
well as synaptic strength.[4,6,9,10] These microstructural
alterations are believed to underly the gray matter deficits reported in PTSD and
other stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders.[7,8,10]Several, though not all, previous structural neuroimaging studies have demonstrated
gray matter abnormalities in PTSD, in particular reduced hippocampal
volume[7,8,12,13] and prefrontal cortical
thickness,[14,15] in addition to mixed evidence of increased or reduced amygdala
volume,[16,17] which may be mitigated by early life stress (ELS), severity of
exposure, and the time course of the disorder. Two recent studies examined the
interplay between combat exposure and ELS on brain volume and thickness in
Veterans[18,19] and found that ELS may increase sensitivity to combat trauma
and susceptibility to developing trauma- or other stress-related psychopathology in
adulthood. The extent to which combat exposure severity affects cortical thickness,
after controlling for ELS and PTSD, is not fully known. Advancing our understanding
of the possible unique neural effects of combat exposure has potential to help
identify biomarkers and treatment targets for early intervention and treatment.This preliminary study examines the effects of combat exposure on cortical thickness,
controlling for ELS (specifically childhood abuse/neglect) history. Based on current
evidence regarding the effects of chronic stress, we hypothesized that combat
exposure severity will be associated with reduced cortical thickness. We also
predicted that those with a diagnosis of PTSD will demonstrate greater reductions in
cortical thickness than combat-exposed healthy controls.
Methods
Participants
This preliminary study included 20 male combat-exposed Veterans with PTSD and 21
age-matched male combat-exposed healthy controls (combat controls; CC). All
participants had been deployed on one or more tours to Iraq and/or Afghanistan
and reported exposure to combat-related experiences. All participants were 18 to
50 years of age and were excluded based on moderate to severe traumatic brain
injury (TBI), neurological disorder, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
contraindications. For those participants with PTSD, current drug and/or alcohol
abuse and recent change in antidepressant medications were also exclusionary. To
help increase generalizability of any findings, Veterans with a history of mild
TBI and those who were on a stable dose (four weeks or more) of an
antidepressant or other select medications were eligible to participate. The
Yale University Human Research Protection Program and the VA Connecticut
Healthcare System Human Subjects Subcommittee approved the study. All
participants provided written informed consent before any procedures took
place.
Clinical Assessment
The presence and severity of PTSD was assessed using the gold standard,
semi-structured Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-IV).[20] In the current study, a cutoff of 50 was used to differentiate PTSD from
non-PTSD. Exposure to wartime and combat stressors was assessed using the Combat
Exposure Scale (CES),[21] which classifies self-reported experiences into one of five severity
groups ranging from “light” to “heavy.” ELS, specifically childhood
abuse/neglect, was assessed using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ),[22] a standardized, retrospective self-report comprised of five
subscales—physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, and physical and emotional
neglect. The Beck Depression Inventory—Second Edition (BDI-II)[23] is a 21-item self-report measure of depressive symptoms.
MRI Data Acquisition and Processing
MRI data acquisition was performed using a 3T Siemens TIM Trio system with a
12-channel head coil (MPRAGE, voxel size 1 × 1 × 1 mm, repetition time 2.5 s,
echo time 2.77 ms, flip angle 7°). All processing procedures were completed on
the same machine to achieve optimal measurement reliability across data
processing conditions and to avoid discrepant findings based on computer or
software specifications.[24] MRI images carefully reviewed for motion, artifacts, and other potential
problems before beginning processing and analysis. Scans were processed to
create individualized models of each participant’s cortical mantle through the
fully automated recon-all cortical reconstruction pipeline in the FreeSurfer
image analysis suite, a widely used and freely available software program
(http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).Details regarding these procedures and the benefits of using an inflated surface
are well described in earlier publications,[25-28] and the reliability of
obtaining quality measurements of cortical thickness from MRI scans has been
well documented.[29-31] Briefly,
images processing begins with motion artifact correction and removal of
non-brain tissue (i.e., skull stripping). Next the images are transformed using
intensity normalization and Talairach transformation.[32] We then complete signal-intensity correction, automated topology
correction, and tessellation of the gray matter/white matter boundary,[33,34] followed
by automated segmentation of the white matter surface and reconstruction of the
pial surface at the location with greatest shift in intensity defines the
transition to other tissues.[26,27] Spherical registration and
surface inflation procedures are based on the matching of cortical folding
patterns across individuals. Cortical thickness was computed as the closest
distance from the gray matter/white matter boundary to the gray matter/CSF
boundary at each vertex on the tessellated surface.[27] In this case, using FreeSurfer’s automated pipeline cortical thickness
was mapped to the inflated surface and filtered using a circularly symmetric
Gaussian surface-based smoothing kernel with a full width at half-maximum (FWMH)
of 20 mm and averaged across participants (see earlier works[27,35] for more
detailed procedures).
Data Analysis
Independent t tests were used to examine the difference in the
demographic and clinical measures between the study groups. Statistical
comparisons of global data and surface maps were generated in FreeSurfer’s
Query, Design, Estimate, Contrast (QDEC) application using a general linear
model (GLM) whole-brain vertex-wise analysis. Given the known significant
effects of aging on cortical structure and integrity,[35] participant age was retained as covariate in all cortical thickness
analyses. We conducted a GLM with Group (PTSD vs. CC) as discrete variable, CES
as continuous variable, Group × CES as an interaction term, and ELS and age as
covariates. This model examined the effects of CES severity, PTSD status, and
the interaction between groups and CES on cortical thickness across the whole
cerebrum, while controlling for ELS and age. Statistical significance levels
were cluster-corrected using a Monte Carlo simulation to obtain a corrected
p < 0.05.
Results
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics
Demographic variables and measures assessing PTSD diagnostic status and symptom
severity, combat exposure, and ELS are provided in Table 1. Higher CES, BDI-II, and CAPS
scores were found in the PTSD group. There were no significant differences
between rates of emotional, physical, or sexual abuse, nor emotional or physical
neglect between Veterans with PTSD and combat controls.
Table 1.
Brief demographic, psychological, and cortical thickness
information.
Full sample (n = 41) Mean (SD)
PTSD (n = 20) Mean (SD)
CC (n = 21) Mean (SD)
p
Age
32.66 (7.86)
32.05 (7.25)
33.24 (8.55)
0.64
CES
14.76 (10.23)
19.65 (10.48)
10.10 (7.64)
0.002
CTQ-EA
9.12 (4.79)
9.90 (4.72)
8.38 (4.85)
0.32
CTQ-PA
7.83 (3.45)
8.15 (3.13)
7.52 (3.72)
0.57
CTQ-SA
5.98 (2.54)
5.75 (1.62)
6.19 (3.20)
0.59
CTQ-EN
11.59 (5.37)
11.75 (5.90)
11.43 (4.95)
0.85
CTQ-PN
7.93 (3.50)
8.30 (3.78)
7.57 (3.26)
0.51
BDI-II
13.71 (12.75)
19.80 (13.24)
7.90 (9.29)
0.002
CAPS-IV
28.51 (29.57)
52.60 (23.79)
5.57 (8.84)
0.00
CES/CT Main Effect L-SP
3.02 mm (0.16)
2.98 mm (0.15)
3.05 mm (0.16)
–
CES/CT Main Effect L-RMF
2.59 mm (0.19)
2.53 mm (0.18)
2.64 mm (0.18)
–
Interaction Group × CES L-SP/INS
3.09 mm (0.17)
3.07 mm (0.15)
3.11 mm (0.19)
–
PTSD: posttraumatic stress disorder; CC: combat-exposed healthy
control; CES: Combat Exposure Scale; CTQ-EA: Childhood Trauma
Questionnaire Emotional Abuse Subscale; CTQ-PA: physical abuse;
CTQ-SA: sexual abuse; CTQ-EN: emotional neglect; CTQ-PN:
physical neglect; BDI-II: Beck Depression Inventory; CAPS-IV:
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale; CES/CT Main Effect L-SP:
average cortical thickness in the main effect of CES in the left
superior temporal region; CES/CT Main Effect L-RMF: average
cortical thickness in the main effect of CES in the left rostral
middle frontal region; Interaction Group × CES L-SP/INS: average
cortical thickness for the interaction between group and CES
found in the left superior temporal and insular regions; mm:
millimeters.
Brief demographic, psychological, and cortical thickness
information.PTSD: posttraumatic stress disorder; CC: combat-exposed healthy
control; CES: Combat Exposure Scale; CTQ-EA: Childhood Trauma
Questionnaire Emotional Abuse Subscale; CTQ-PA: physical abuse;
CTQ-SA: sexual abuse; CTQ-EN: emotional neglect; CTQ-PN:
physical neglect; BDI-II: Beck Depression Inventory; CAPS-IV:
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale; CES/CT Main Effect L-SP:
average cortical thickness in the main effect of CES in the left
superior temporal region; CES/CT Main Effect L-RMF: average
cortical thickness in the main effect of CES in the left rostral
middle frontal region; Interaction Group × CES L-SP/INS: average
cortical thickness for the interaction between group and CES
found in the left superior temporal and insular regions; mm:
millimeters.
Main Effects of Group and CES
Following correction for multiple comparisons using Monte Carlo Simulation, the
GLM model revealed a significant main effect of CES scores but no Group effect.
As shown in Figure 1,
CES scores were significantly associated with two clusters showing a negative
correlation between CES severity and cortical thickness in the left superior
temporal (size = 2686.35 mm2, xyz = −38, 16, 10;
z = −2.12, corrected p < 0.05) and left
rostral middle frontal (size = 3699.62 mm2, xyz = −37, 24, 25;
z = −3.70, corrected p < 0.05) regions.
To illustrate the relationship between CES severity and cortical thickness at
the individual level, we extracted the average cortical thickness in each of
these two clusters from each subject and plotted a scatter showing the negative
slope correlating CES and cortical thickness residuals (i.e., after regressing
the effects of age, ELS, and Group; Figure 2(a) and (b)).
Figure 1.
Cortical thickness and combat exposure severity. Two clusters, one in
the left superior temporal region (size = 2686.35 mm2,
xyz = −38, 16, 10; z = −2.12, corrected
p < 0.05) and one in the left rostral middle frontal
region (size = 3699.62 mm2, xyz = −37, 24, 25;
z = − 3.70, corrected
p < 0.05), remained significant following cluster
correction. Both show a negative correlation between CES severity
and cortical thickness.
Figure 2.
Scatter plots of cortical thickness and combat exposure severity. The
scatter plots indicate the extracted average cortical thickness,
showing the negative slop correlating CES and cortical thickness
residuals (i.e., after regressing the effects of age, ELS, and Group
(PTSD diagnosis status). (a) The scatter in the significant cluster
found in the superior frontal region (r = −0.50,
n = 41, p = 0.0008). (b) The
scatter in the rostal middle frontal region
(r = −0.47, n = 41,
p = 0.0018).
Cortical thickness and combat exposure severity. Two clusters, one in
the left superior temporal region (size = 2686.35 mm2,
xyz = −38, 16, 10; z = −2.12, corrected
p < 0.05) and one in the left rostral middle frontal
region (size = 3699.62 mm2, xyz = −37, 24, 25;
z = − 3.70, corrected
p < 0.05), remained significant following cluster
correction. Both show a negative correlation between CES severity
and cortical thickness.Scatter plots of cortical thickness and combat exposure severity. The
scatter plots indicate the extracted average cortical thickness,
showing the negative slop correlating CES and cortical thickness
residuals (i.e., after regressing the effects of age, ELS, and Group
(PTSD diagnosis status). (a) The scatter in the significant cluster
found in the superior frontal region (r = −0.50,
n = 41, p = 0.0008). (b) The
scatter in the rostal middle frontal region
(r = −0.47, n = 41,
p = 0.0018).
Interaction Between Group and CES
Following Monte Carlo Simulation correction for multiple comparisons, the GLM
model also revealed significant interaction between Group and CES in one cluster
in the superior temporal/insular region (size = 2077.41 mm2,
xyz = −32, −32, 17; z = −1.47, p < 0.05;
Figure 3), showing
higher negative correlation between CES and cortical thickness in the CC,
compared to the PTSD group. To delineate the interaction between CES severity
and PTSD status, we extracted the average of cortical thickness in the
significant cluster from each participant and correlated thickness with CES in
each group. This correlational analysis depicted a significant negative
association between CES and cortical thickness in the CC
(r = 0.51, n = 21,
p = 0.0003; Figure 4(a)), but not in the PTSD group (r = 0.012,
n = 20, p = 0.65; Figure 4(b)).
Figure 3.
Interaction of PTSD diagnosis status/group, CES, and cortical
thickness. One cluster in the superior temporal/insular region
(size = 2077.41 mm2, xyz = −32, −32, 17;
z = −1.47, p < 0.05)
remained significant following cluster correction, demonstrating the
interaction between group (PTSD diagnosis status) and CES. A
stronger negative correlation is found between CES and cortical
thickness in combat-exposed control group, compared to the PTSD
group.
Figure 4.
Scatter plots of CES and PTSD relative to cortical thickness. The
scatter plots indicate the extracted average cortical thickness in
the significant cluster from each participant. These show the
correlated thickness with CES and delineate the interaction between
CES severity and PTSD status. This correlational analysis showed a
significant negative association between CES and cortical thickness
in the CC (r = 0.51, n = 20,
p = 0.0003; Figure 4(a)) but not in the
PTSD group (r = 0.012, n = 21,
p = 0.65). (a) Combat Control (CC) Group. (b)
Veteran + PTSD Group.
Interaction of PTSD diagnosis status/group, CES, and cortical
thickness. One cluster in the superior temporal/insular region
(size = 2077.41 mm2, xyz = −32, −32, 17;
z = −1.47, p < 0.05)
remained significant following cluster correction, demonstrating the
interaction between group (PTSD diagnosis status) and CES. A
stronger negative correlation is found between CES and cortical
thickness in combat-exposed control group, compared to the PTSD
group.Scatter plots of CES and PTSD relative to cortical thickness. The
scatter plots indicate the extracted average cortical thickness in
the significant cluster from each participant. These show the
correlated thickness with CES and delineate the interaction between
CES severity and PTSD status. This correlational analysis showed a
significant negative association between CES and cortical thickness
in the CC (r = 0.51, n = 20,
p = 0.0003; Figure 4(a)) but not in the
PTSD group (r = 0.012, n = 21,
p = 0.65). (a) Combat Control (CC) Group. (b)
Veteran + PTSD Group.
Discussion
The results, demonstrating that combat exposure severity is negatively associated
with cortical thickness in the left frontal and temporal cortex of combat-exposed
Iraq/Afghanistan Veterans, are largely consistent with previous investigations of
gray matter integrity in PTSD as prefrontal regions have been well established to
play a cardinal role in the pathophysiology of both PTSD and
resilience/recovery.[14,36,37] This work is also largely consistent with previous
investigations of cortical thickness in Veteran samples, also highlighting the
prefrontal and superior temporal regions.[14,15,38,39] These associations remained
significant after adjustment for PTSD status, ELS, and age.The significant negative association found between combat exposure and cortical
thickness in the insular area of combat-exposed Veterans not meeting diagnostic
criteria for PTSD is interesting. Though very preliminary, this result may suggest
insidious neurobiological effects of combat and war-time stressors, regardless of
whether or not these occur in the context of a full diagnosis of PTSD. This result
is in line with previous findings suggesting the experiencing of having PTSD
symptoms, even if subthreshold, may confound the neural effects of combat exposure.[15] It is also possible that alterations in cortical GM integrity in certain
brain regions may influence the expression of trauma-related symptoms.[15]It has been well established that chronic, unpredictable stress has adverse
neurobiological effects.[40] The nature of sustained combat is a unique experience of uncontrolled and
unpredictable stress, often requiring heightened awareness of self and surroundings;
regular, quick manipulation and retrieval of data; and continual, often high
intensity sensory input and threat assessment for prolonged periods. This is
especially likely in an urban warfare environment like the combat theaters in Iraq
and Afghanistan. It is possible during periods of prolonged extreme stress such as a
combat deployment that these areas experience deleterious effects on neural
integrity, as if they were “over-worked” or “prematurely aged” as a consequence of
the need to be nearly always alert, aware, and watchful. The negative correlation is
stronger in the non-PTSD group, and the data in Figure 4 portray a plateau-like effect for
the PTSD group, suggesting there are perhaps vulnerability factors or other
differences inherent to those who develop PTSD compared to those who do not. This
underscores the need for further analysis of the role of the insula in trauma
processing and the development of PTSD. Further, as previous work has implicated
prefrontal regions in both the pathophysiology of PTSD and resilience, it will be
important to further explore the potential role of the superior temporal and insular
regions as aspects of vulnerability/resilience.Finally, in this relatively small cohort, PTSD status was unrelated to cortical
thickness after Monte Carlo correction for multiple comparisons and controlling for
CES, ELS, and age (GLM Group main effect) suggesting that prior significant stress
may potentially account for some the observed cortical thickness in veterans
reported in other studies.The brain regions surviving correction for multiple comparisons, identified in
relation to CES severity and reduced cortical thickness are associated with
functions that may contribute to symptoms of stress-related psychopathology. The
rostral middle frontal region is thought to be involved in self- and other-awareness
in coordination with sensory and emotional processing, working memory, fear
conditioning, selective responding, and stimulus-orientated thought.[41] The superior temporal region is associated with speech perception, pattern
classification, and auditory processing and specialized encoding.[42] If we consider the way fear-evoking memories seem to be encoded and recalled
in the context of stress-related psychopathology, and the potential auditory
trauma-triggers in reexperiencing and avoidance (e.g., the sound of a helicopter or
gun fire) alterations or damage in this area could potentially serve as a
significant factor for some of the well-documented characteristics of combat-related
PTSD. The insular cortex is associated with self-awareness specifically of one’s
visceral and internal states including autonomic physiological responses such as
heart rate and respiration.[43,44] It is possible that alternations in this area may compromise
the capacity for regulation of physiological hyperarousal that is a common response
to fear.This investigation is preliminary in nature and has limitations that must be
acknowledged. First, the sample size is relatively small and comprised solely of
male combat veterans. Larger and more diverse samples will be necessary to ascertain
generalizability of the findings and to optimize our ability to detect a main effect
of PTSD. Especially as women are increasingly involved in combat roles, being able
to explore sex differences will be important in prevention and treatment planning.
Combat severity in this sample is somewhat limited and a broader range of exposure
severity will provide rich data regarding the neural consequences of this type of
chronic stress. Mild TBI (mTBI) was not an exclusionary criteria and may have
contributed to cortical alterations.Areas for future research include impact of multiple deployments; type and duration
of combat exposure and combat severity; PTSD symptom cluster analysis; impact of
blast exposures, even in the absence of TBI; time since deployment (to advance our
understanding of the time course of cortical alterations); longitudinal data that
would allow for assessment of pre- and post-deployment to further characterize the
effects of combat; examination of cognitive capacity and function as it is possible
there is reverse causality in which lower cortical thickness is associated with
increased likelihood of serving in combat roles; assessment of nonmilitary adult
trauma; assessment of types of ELS and trauma not assessed by the CTQ; careful
examination of potential confounds including other psychopathology, substance abuse,
medications, and physical/medical conditions; other possible vulnerabilities and
protective factors; factors that may be relevant to military personnel more likely
to see sustained combat or multiple deployments (e.g., education level, personality
characteristics). Relative to the comment about physical/medical conditions, a
recent study found that chronic pain may influence the relationship between combat
exposure and cortical thickness in Veterans.[40]Despite these limitations, results of this study indicate that combat exposure is
associated with reduced cortical structure beyond possible alterations due to ELS
exposure or PTSD, highlighting the need for careful assessment of combat exposure in
returning Veterans. Though very preliminary and thus requiring caution in
interpretation, the results further highlight the pathogenic effects of combat,
regardless of whether or not these experiences lead to the development of PTSD.
These brain regions are associated with memory, response suppression, and emotion
dysregulation. The nature of combat, requiring heightened awareness of self and
surroundings, continual sensory input, and regular manipulation/retrieval of data,
may influence the demonstrated structural alterations. Reductions in cortical
thickness may be secondary to alterations in the gray/white matter boundary related
to a loss of dendrites, reduced dendritic spines, or differences in myelination
within specific brain regions,[38,40] or reduced or altered glial
cell production, density, and function.[10] Future, multimodal assessment may provide insights into neural biomarkers and
treatment targets that can advance our understanding of the neurobiology of chronic
exposure to traumatic stress and inform prevention, intervention, and treatment
including novel drug development.
Authors: Elbert Geuze; Herman G M Westenberg; Armin Heinecke; Carien S de Kloet; Rainer Goebel; Eric Vermetten Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-06
Authors: Daniel C M O'Doherty; Kate M Chitty; Sonia Saddiqui; Maxwell R Bennett; Jim Lagopoulos Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Ed H B M Gronenschild; Petra Habets; Heidi I L Jacobs; Ron Mengelers; Nico Rozendaal; Jim van Os; Machteld Marcelis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Chadi G Abdallah; Lynnette A Averill; Teddy J Akiki; Mohsin Raza; Christopher L Averill; Hassaan Gomaa; Archana Adikey; John H Krystal Journal: Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 13.820
Authors: Kenneth Blum; M C Gondré-Lewis; E J Modestino; L Lott; D Baron; D Siwicki; T McLaughlin; A Howeedy; M H Krengel; M Oscar-Berman; P K Thanos; I Elman; M Hauser; L Fried; A Bowirrat; R D Badgaiyan Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Kenneth Blum; Edward J Modestino; David Baron; Raymond Brewer; Panayotis Thanos; Igor Elman; Rajendra D Badgaiyan; B William Downs; Debasis Bagchi; Thomas McLaughlin; Abdalla Bowirrat; A Kenison Roy; Mark S Gold Journal: Curr Psychopharmacol Date: 2021-08-01
Authors: Lynnette A Averill; Chadi G Abdallah; Lisa R Fenton; Madonna K Fasula; Lihong Jiang; Douglas L Rothman; Graeme F Mason; Gerard Sanacora Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Cassandra L Pattinson; Pashtun Shahim; Patricia Taylor; Kerri Dunbar; Vivian A Guedes; Vida Motamedi; Chen Lai; Christina Devoto; Jordan Peyer; Michael J Roy; Jessica M Gill Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2020 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Christopher L Averill; Ritvij M Satodiya; J Cobb Scott; Kristen M Wrocklage; Brian Schweinsburg; Lynnette A Averill; Teddy J Akiki; Timothy Amoroso; Steven M Southwick; John H Krystal; Chadi G Abdallah Journal: Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks) Date: 2017-12-13
Authors: Alexandra L Clark; Victoria C Merritt; Erin D Bigler; Katherine J Bangen; Madeleine Werhane; Scott F Sorg; Mark W Bondi; Dawn M Schiehser; Lisa Delano-Wood Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Christopher L Averill; Lynnette A Averill; Kristen M Wrocklage; J Cobb Scott; Teddy J Akiki; Brian Schweinsburg; Steven M Southwick; John H Krystal; Chadi G Abdallah Journal: Mol Neuropsychiatry Date: 2018-07-19