François Maignen1, Manfred Hauben2, Jean-Michel Dogné3. 1. Office of Health Economics, Southside, 105 Victoria Street, London SW1E 6QT, UK. 2. Pfizer Inc. New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Pharmacy-NTHC-NARILIS, FUNDP, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of measures of disproportionality (Lower95CI) is widely used in signal detection. Masking is a statistical issue by which true signals of disproportionate reporting are hidden by the presence of other medicines. The primary objective of our study is to develop and validate a mathematical framework for assessing the masking effect of Lower95CI. METHODS: We have developed our new algorithm based on the masking ratio (MR) developed for the measures of disproportionality. A MR for the Lower95CI (MRCI) is proposed. A simulation study to validate this algorithm was also conducted. RESULTS: We have established the existence of a very close mathematical relation between MR and MRCI. For a given drug-event pair, the same product will be responsible for the highest masking effect with the measure of disproportionality and its Lower95CI. The extent of masking is likely to be very similar across the two methods. An important proportion of identical drug-event associations affected by the presence of an important masking effect is revealed by the unmasking exercise, whether the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) or its confidence interval are used. CONCLUSION: The detection of the masking effect of Lower95CI can be automated. The real benefits of this unmasking in terms of new true-positive signals (rate of true-positive/false-positive) or time gained by the revealing of signals using this method have not been fully assessed. These benefits should be demonstrated in the context of prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of measures of disproportionality (Lower95CI) is widely used in signal detection. Masking is a statistical issue by which true signals of disproportionate reporting are hidden by the presence of other medicines. The primary objective of our study is to develop and validate a mathematical framework for assessing the masking effect of Lower95CI. METHODS: We have developed our new algorithm based on the masking ratio (MR) developed for the measures of disproportionality. A MR for the Lower95CI (MRCI) is proposed. A simulation study to validate this algorithm was also conducted. RESULTS: We have established the existence of a very close mathematical relation between MR and MRCI. For a given drug-event pair, the same product will be responsible for the highest masking effect with the measure of disproportionality and its Lower95CI. The extent of masking is likely to be very similar across the two methods. An important proportion of identical drug-event associations affected by the presence of an important masking effect is revealed by the unmasking exercise, whether the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) or its confidence interval are used. CONCLUSION: The detection of the masking effect of Lower95CI can be automated. The real benefits of this unmasking in terms of new true-positive signals (rate of true-positive/false-positive) or time gained by the revealing of signals using this method have not been fully assessed. These benefits should be demonstrated in the context of prospective studies.
Keywords:
adverse drug reactions reporting systems; masking; pharmacovigilance; postmarketing; product surveillance; signal; signal detection
Authors: Mickael Arnaud; Francesco Salvo; Ismaïl Ahmed; Philip Robinson; Nicholas Moore; Bernard Bégaud; Pascale Tubert-Bitter; Antoine Pariente Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: June Almenoff; Joseph M Tonning; A Lawrence Gould; Ana Szarfman; Manfred Hauben; Rita Ouellet-Hellstrom; Robert Ball; Ken Hornbuckle; Louisa Walsh; Chuen Yee; Susan T Sacks; Nancy Yuen; Vaishali Patadia; Michael Blum; Mike Johnston; Charles Gerrits; Harry Seifert; Karol Lacroix Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2005 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Gianluca Trifirò; Antoine Pariente; Preciosa M Coloma; Jan A Kors; Giovanni Polimeni; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Maria Antonietta Catania; Francesco Salvo; Anaelle David; Nicholas Moore; Achille Patrizio Caputi; Miriam Sturkenboom; Mariam Molokhia; Julia Hippisley-Cox; Carlos Diaz Acedo; Johan van der Lei; Annie Fourrier-Reglat Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Antoine Pariente; Paul Avillach; Francesco Salvo; Frantz Thiessard; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Annie Fourrier-Reglat; Françoise Haramburu; Bernard Bégaud; Nicholas Moore Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: James R Rogers; Ameet Sarpatwari; Rishi J Desai; Justin M Bohn; Nazleen F Khan; Aaron S Kesselheim; Michael A Fischer; Joshua J Gagne; John G Connolly Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: M Reza Sadaie; Mehdi Farhoudi; Masumeh Zamanlu; Nasser Aghamohammadzadeh; Atieh Amouzegar; Robert E Rosenbaum; Gary A Thomas Journal: Ther Adv Drug Saf Date: 2018-05-08