Literature DB >> 11828828

Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports.

S J Evans1, P C Waller, S Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The process of generating 'signals' of possible unrecognized hazards from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting data has been likened to looking for a needle in a haystack. However, statistical approaches to the data have been under-utilised.
METHODS: Using the UK Yellow Card database, we have developed and evaluated a statistical aid to signal generation called a Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR). The proportion of all reactions to a drug which are for a particular medical condition of interest is compared to the same proportion for all drugs in the database, in a 2 x 2 table. We investigated a group of newly-marketed drugs using as minimum criteria for a signal, 3 or more cases, PRR at least 2, chi-squared of at least 4.
FINDINGS: The database was used to examine retrospectively 15 drugs newly-marketed in the UK, with the highest levels of ADR reporting. The method identified 481 signals meeting the minimum criteria during the period 1996-8. Further evaluation of these showed that 70% were known adverse reactions, 13% were events which were likely to be related to the underlying disease and 17% were signals requiring further evaluation. IMPLICATIONS: Proportional reporting ratios are a valuable aid to signal generation from spontaneous reporting data which are easy to calculate and interpret, and various refinements are possible.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11828828     DOI: 10.1002/pds.677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  334 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative methods in pharmacovigilance: focus on signal detection.

Authors:  Manfred Hauben; Xiaofeng Zhou
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  A cross-country comparison of rivaroxaban spontaneous adverse event reports and concomitant medicine use with the potential to increase the risk of harm.

Authors:  Cameron J McDonald; Lisa M Kalisch Ellett; John D Barratt; Gillian E Caughey
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Causal association in pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology: thoughts on the application of the Austin Bradford-Hill criteria.

Authors:  Saad A W Shakir; Deborah Layton
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Automated signal generation in prescription-event monitoring.

Authors:  Emma Heeley; Lynda V Wilton; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Effects of coding dictionary on signal generation: a consideration of use of MedDRA compared with WHO-ART.

Authors:  Elliot G Brown
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Application of quantitative signal detection in the Dutch spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Eugène van Puijenbroek; Willem Diemont; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Application of data mining techniques in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Andrew M Wilson; Lehana Thabane; Anne Holbrook
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  The periodic safety update report as a pharmacovigilance tool.

Authors:  Michael J Klepper
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Using MedDRA: implications for risk management.

Authors:  Elliot G Brown
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  The general practice research database: role in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Louise Wood; Carlos Martinez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.