Literature DB >> 28845208

In-Situ 2p3d Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering Tracking Cobalt Nanoparticle Reduction.

Boyang Liu1, Matti M van Schooneveld1, Yi-Tao Cui2, Jun Miyawaki2, Yoshihisa Harada2, Thomas O Eschemann1, Krijn P de Jong1, Mario U Delgado-Jaime1, Frank M F de Groot1.   

Abstract

In-situ carbon-thermal reduction of cobalt oxide nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes was studied by cobalt 2p3d resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS). The in-situ 2p X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and RIXS measurements were performed at 500, 600, and 700 °C, where four consistent excitation energies were used for RIXS acquisitions. After 700 °C reduction, the XAS spectrum shows a cobalt metal-like shape, while the RIXS spectra reveal the minority cobalt monoxide phase. The holistic fit on both XAS and RIXS data reveals the respective contributions from metal and monoxide. We show that the relative precision to determine the monoxide content changes from ∼5.6% in XAS results to better than 0.8% in the RIXS analysis, suggesting that RIXS is a useful tool to track the oxidation state of nanoparticles under in situ conditions. We determined a relative radiative ratio (P) factor of approximately 5, where this factor gives the ratio between the relative strengths of the radiative decay channels compared to the nonradiative channels in CoO and Co metal.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28845208      PMCID: PMC5563841          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces        ISSN: 1932-7447            Impact factor:   4.126


Introduction

In chemical reactions where transition metal nanoparticles play pivotal roles, it is an important goal to track the phase evolution of nanoparticles during activation and usage. In catalysis, for example, tracking chemical phase changes can be essential to unveil deactivation processes of catalysts, while quantifying the active phase can be used to understand catalytic performances.[1] A nuisance of probing minority chemical species is that they are often obscured by signal of majority phases. A minority phase in the sea of major chemical phases can, however, be a key phase, such as the catalytic active phase, that requires the effective detection of it. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is an element-specific technique that is sensitive to the oxidation state and different chemical environments. In-situ XAS further allows the probing of phase information under relevant reaction conditions.[2−4] Due to strong multiplet effects and a small core-hole lifetime broadening,[5] 2p XAS spectra (L2,3 edges) of transition metals exhibit rich characteristic features and high chemical sensitivities. Because the XAS edge jump is an atomic property, the XAS intensity scales linearly with the number of atoms, which has made XAS a widely applied technique to discriminate phase heterogeneities and to obtain phase concentrations by fitting procedures.[6−9] However, for minority phase detection, a limitation present in 2p XAS is that signals from majority phases overwhelm details of the minority phase.[10] Although fitting procedures were used to determine the minority phase information including concentrations, we note that the overlap of spectroscopic signatures from different phases can lead to multiple interpretations. A minority phase, under such cases, can even be undetected when its signatures are hidden under those from majority phases. In this regard, high-energy resolution 2p3d resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS), which can selectively enhance spectral features from a particular phase of interest, is a complementary spectroscopic tool to 2p XAS. Because the RIXS signal can selectively be enhanced by the corresponding XAS intensity, it is a nonlinear technique with respect to the number of atoms that adds to the possible detection of minority phases. We use Co3O4 nanoparticles supported on CNTs as model Fischer–Tropsch catalyst precursors, where we study the reduction process of Co3O4 nanoparticles. We show that 2p3d RIXS can be more useful than 2p XAS in detecting the minority species under in-situ conditions. In an ex-situ study the higher accuracy of 2p3d RIXS over 2p XAS in detecting minority species was previously demonstrated.[10] Here we perform detailed fits to a large data set, acquired in situ, to reveal more insights. The fitted results are used to understand the sensitivity of 2p3d RIXS on the minority oxide phase detection. Moreover, the established fitting approach allows the quantitative description of a mixed-phase system with high precision, revealing application potential in the study of active catalysts and other active materials.

Experiments

The Co3O4/CNT catalyst was prepared according to published procedures[11] with a cobalt loading of 8 wt %. The dark field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the fresh catalyst (Figure A) shows an average particle size around 5 nm. Some nanoparticle agglomerates are visible, and in the agglomerates it is in principle possible that there will be two ∼5 nm nanoparticles behind each other in the line of the X-ray beam. This would generate effectively a 10 nm beam path through the particles. Given the X-ray penetration depth of ∼50 nm, this will not yield any saturation effect for X-rays. The electron yield has an escape depth of ∼5 nm, and minor saturation effects could occur; however, due to the majority of 5 nm nanoparticles this will not be detectable. Both X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and cobalt 2p XAS, shown in the Supporting Information, indicate the Co3O4 phase of cobalt oxide nanoparticles before reduction.
Figure 1

(A) Dark-field TEM image of the fresh catalyst. (B) Schematic representation of XAS and RIXS measurements.

(A) Dark-field TEM image of the fresh catalyst. (B) Schematic representation of XAS and RIXS measurements. In Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, cobalt metal is reported to be the active phase during hydrogenation of CO.[12,13] Several studies have applied in-situ TEM or XRD to examine the reduction process of carbon-supported transition metal nanoparticle catalysts.[14−16] However, TEM has a limitation of probing phase information only to selected nanoparticles; XRD reveals crystalline phases only in nonquantitative ways. On the contratry, X-ray spectroscopies offer bulk phase information on nanoparticles with feasibilities to quantify phase concentrations. Here we compare differences of in-situ 2p XAS and 2p3d RIXS for revealing the relative phase composition of cobalt-based nanoparticles during reduction. In-situ measurements were performed at BL07LSU[17] in SPring-8. The catalyst was pressed into a thin pellet and loaded on the sample holder, which was then heated in a vacuum chamber attached next to the main chamber for the sample reduction. The temperature on the sample surface was monitored by a well-calibrated pyrometer. After heating in vacuum at 500, 600, and 700 °C, respectively, the sample was cooled and transferred into the main chamber for spectra acquisitions. Figure B sketches the XAS and RIXS measurements. XAS spectra were collected with the total electron yield mode by measuring the sample current. RIXS spectra were acquired under a 90° scattering angle in the linear horizontal scattering geometry. Detailed experimental procedures and spectra acquisitions are specified in the Supporting Information.

Results and Discussion

Temperature-dependent cobalt 2p3/2 XAS spectra of the catalyst together with literature reference CoO[18] and cobalt metal[19] spectra are shown in Figure A. From the analysis, it is clear that CoO and cobalt metal phases coexist in cobalt nanoparticles after reduction at 500 and 600 °C. No sign of the initial Co3O4 is observed after these treatments. The CoO phase concentration decreased with increasing reduction temperature, as shown by the drop of relative intensities of features at the pre-edge (777.3 eV) and the shoulder (779.8 eV). The spectrum acquired after the reduction at 700 °C shows no visible fine structures of CoO, from which it could then be erroneously concluded that the fully reduced cobalt nanoparticles are present. Nevertheless, here in situ 2p3d RIXS was carried out to further examine the phases changes and map its complementariness to 2p XAS. For RIXS measurements, excitations were chosen at energies a–d as indicated in Figure A.
Figure 2

Experimental cobalt spectra of the catalyst after vacuum heating at room temperature, 500, 600, and 700 °C: (A) 2p3/2 XAS spectra. Four dotted lines indicate excitation energies a–d for 2p3d RIXS. (B) 2p3d RIXS spectra at 500 °C (dark green), 600 °C (red), and 700 °C (dark yellow). The purple dotted line indicates the first d–d excitation from CoO. In (A), the literature reference spectra of Co[18] and CoO[19] are plotted for comparison.

Experimental cobalt spectra of the catalyst after vacuum heating at room temperature, 500, 600, and 700 °C: (A) 2p3/2 XAS spectra. Four dotted lines indicate excitation energies a–d for 2p3d RIXS. (B) 2p3d RIXS spectra at 500 °C (dark green), 600 °C (red), and 700 °C (dark yellow). The purple dotted line indicates the first d–d excitation from CoO. In (A), the literature reference spectra of Co[18] and CoO[19] are plotted for comparison. 2p3d RIXS spectra of metal oxides are composed of the zero energy transfer peak that corresponds to the elastic scattering and positive energy transfer features corresponding to phonon, magnon, d–d, and charge transfer excitations.[20,21] Phonon and magnon excitations constitute low energy (<0.1 eV) features, while d–d excitations occur at the fixed energy transfer corresponding to energy differences with respect to the ground state irrespective of incident X-ray energies. The charge transfer excitations in a divalent metal oxide, such as CoO, have little intensity and are often shaded by d–d features unless excitation energies at charge transfer satellites in 2p XAS are chosen.[18,22] For metals, the 2p3d RIXS measures a fixed X-ray emission by transition from delocalized states to the 2p core hole that has energy transfer from the elastic line linearly dependent on the incident X-ray energies and is described as fluorescence (FL).[23] Here the 2p3d RIXS signals originated from CoO or cobalt metal are referred to as “CoO RIXS” and “Co metal FL”, respectively. Figure B shows the corresponding temperature-dependent 2p3d RIXS spectra. Data sets from the same excitation energy are normalized to the elastic peak. The increase of the pure metal concentration is most directly observed from spectra acquired at energy d, since the metal FL peak around 3 eV separates further from CoO characteristic d–d peaks around 0.9 and 2.1 eV.[18,22] In the current reduction steps, no new phases other than the CoO and cobalt metal, such as cobalt carbides, were found, consistent with previously reported in situ XRD results.[11,15] Interestingly, the d–d peak of CoO around 0.9 eV in data sets of 700 °C from excitation energies a, c, and d unequivocally indicates the partially reduced nature of cobalt nanoparticles, contrary to the possible conclusion drawn from XAS. We note that the probing depth of TEY XAS at the cobalt 2p3/2 edge is ∼5 nm,[24] while the RIXS can detect photons emitted from several hundreds of nanometers underneath the sample surface.[25] Here, however, the applied heating method (see the Supporting Information) induces the homogeneous reduction of the sample, and the ∼5 nm (even smaller after reduction[11]) cobalt nanoparticles are fully probed by both techniques, but with different sensitivities. In 2p XAS, spectral features of the minority CoO phase are shaded by that of the majority metal phase. However, in 2p3d RIXS, d–d peaks of the CoO RIXS are dominantly enhanced at the excitation energy a and separated from the metal FL when excitations move to higher energies, although at the metal resonance (energy b), oxide features are hidden under the metal FL. Using the difference in XAS intensity at different energy positions, we selectively use the corresponding RIXS features to enhance the CoO signal, making it more intense than the metal species. To obtain phase concentrations and to further explore the sensitivity of 2p3d RIXS for revealing the minority CoO phase, fitting procedures[26,27] were introduced for both XAS and RIXS spectra. Figure shows the fitted spectra along with the corresponding experimental data and spectral components used for fitting.
Figure 3

Fit (orange line) and experimental (black dot) cobalt 2p XAS (upper panel) and 2p3d RIXS (lower panel) spectra. Data sets of the same temperature are in the same column. CoO (blue line) and cobalt metal (red line) references used for fitting 2p XAS are literature reference spectra.[18,19] In 2p3d RIXS, the CoO RIXS (blue line) and metal FL (red line) contributions are shown.

Fit (orange line) and experimental (black dot) cobalt 2p XAS (upper panel) and 2p3d RIXS (lower panel) spectra. Data sets of the same temperature are in the same column. CoO (blue line) and cobalt metal (red line) references used for fitting 2p XAS are literature reference spectra.[18,19] In 2p3d RIXS, the CoO RIXS (blue line) and metal FL (red line) contributions are shown. Temperature-dependent 2p XAS spectra (Figure , upper panel) were fitted holistically. The principle of the holistic fit was described in the literature.[26] Here the 2p XAS at 500, 600, and 700 °C were fitted by using literature CoO[18] and cobalt metal[19] spectra as references. In the fit model, a background function[27] was included to fit both the raw experimental spectra and the two literature reference spectra. The reference spectra after background subtraction were normalized to the intensity of the post-L2 edge (∼803 eV). For the two reference spectra used (between 773 and 803 eV), the L2,3 continuum edge jumps with the 2:1 ratio were included for the Co metal reference spectrum (see the literature reference[19]), while only the L3 continuum edge jump was set for the CoO reference spectrum. Here, the different edge jumps were set due to the difference of electron localization in oxides and in metal. Note that in the fits edge jump positions were allowed to float, which were also linked with the above-mentioned background functions. The scaling factors and the energy shifts between the reference spectra and experimental data were also set in the fit model, which together with other parameters were fitted simultaneously. Concentrations of the CoO phase obtained from XAS fitting are listed in Table (second column). Note that although fitting results indicate the existence of a CoO phase after the reduction at 700 °C the 4.6% uncertainty with respect to a 5.5% average value implies the inadequacy of 2p XAS alone for revealing precise information on this minority phase. In Figure S2 this is further elaborated upon, by showing a series of cobalt 2p XAS spectra, consisting of small contributions of CoO XAS spectra added to pure Co metal XAS spectra. For CoO contents <10% of the obtained high spectral similarities between them explain the large uncertainty in such fitting results.
Table 1

2p XAS and 2p3d RIXS Derived Percentages of the CoO Phase in Co Nanoparticles during the Three Reduction Stepsa

temperature (°C)CoO concentration (%) from 2p XAS fitCoO spectral weight (%) from 2p3d RIXS fitCoO concentration (%) from 2p3d RIXS fit
50018.4 ± 6.156.9 ± 2.520.9 ± 1.7
60014.2 ± 6.033.1 ± 1.39.0 ± 0.5
7005.5 ± 4.610.7 ± 0.82.3 ± 0.2

The concentration values from XAS are obtained directly from the corresponding spectral weights, as obtained from the fits, by normalizing the reference data for CoO and Co using P = 5. Errors given as one standard deviation from all the good fits. Errors in column 4 are calculated from column 3.

The concentration values from XAS are obtained directly from the corresponding spectral weights, as obtained from the fits, by normalizing the reference data for CoO and Co using P = 5. Errors given as one standard deviation from all the good fits. Errors in column 4 are calculated from column 3. The 12 2p3d RIXS data sets (Figure , lower panel) were fitted by using a separate model without including reference spectra. The 12 data sets were merged into one data set that allows the decomposition and fits to be performed holistically. Here, each experimental Co 2p3d RIXS spectrum was composed of “artificial” CoO RIXS and Co FL. All individual peaks that used to comprise the CoO RIXS and Co FL are the pseudo-Voigt peaks. For the CoO RIXS, it is composed of an elastic peak, d–d peaks, and a separate peak that simulates the charge-transfer (CT) effects. The relative energy position of d–d peaks was set to be constant in all the data sets, while energy positions of the CT peak were only fixed for data sets acquired at the same excitation energy. Similarly, all the elastic and d–d peaks were forced to have the same shape (the Lorentzian:Gaussian ratio and the broadening of full width at half-maximum), while the CT peak is only set to be with the same shape for data sets belonging to the same excitation energy and which was allowed to float in the model. Furthermore, the relative intensities of all CoO RIXS features were kept constant for data sets collected at the same excitation energies, but this varies for data sets belonging to different excitation energies. The decompose-fitted CoO RIXS was compared with the literature[18] reference CoO (obtained with different energy resolutions), as shown in Figure S3. Apart from the excitation energy a, other excitation energies chosen in these two works were not consistent; hence, we could only compare RIXS slices obtained by close excitation energies, as noted in the figure legends. The RIXS slices were normalized to the first d–d peak since the elastic peak intensity for data from different measurements is not directly comparable. The comparison of spectra at excitation energy d is not shown in Figure S3 since no reference spectra acquired at close excitation energies are available. For the Co FL, in this model, it was assumed to be with the same shape in all 12 data sets. Because in fluorescence the excitation is decoupled from the decay, the metal FL can be considered as the convolution of XAS with the X-ray emission spectra above the edge. When the excitation energy is chosen above the edge the XAS spectral shape is constant (or slowly varying in intensity) implying that the Co FL is also constant in shape. At the absorption edge the shape of the XAS spectrum slightly modifies the Co FL, where a peak maximum makes the shape sharper and a valley makes the shape slightly broader [see literature reference,[28] cf Figure ]. The fixed shape FL envelope as a whole consists of three peaks, whose relative energy positions, intensity ratios, and shapes are set to be constant. The energy shifts between FL envelopes, belonging to data sets acquired at excitation energies b–d, were set to the corresponding shifts of excitations. However, for the FL envelope that was acquired at the excitation energy a, its energy position was allowed to float since the fixed emission breaks down for this excitation energy. (Here, we need to better interpret our assumption.) The decompose-fitted Co FL was shown in Figure S4. Decompose-fitted results showed that the energy difference between the FL maxima from data sets acquired at excitation energies a and b was around 0.8 eV, whereas the difference between excitation energies a and b is 1.4 eV. The discrepancy is due to that the X-ray Raman was measured when choosing the excitation energy a, while at excitation energies b–d the 2p3d RIXS of Co metal were pure FL with fixed emission energies. Initially, the total CoO RIXS intensity (integrated area) was parametrized as a function of the total Co FL intensity, shown as eq where the parameter r is dependent on the temperature i and the excitation energy j. Since RIXS is a “photon-in photon-out” technique, the r was first normalized by the absorption cross-section ratio of CoOCoO,) to Co metalCo,), as shown in eq . Here, this ratio was obtained from the normalized reference spectra shown in Figure A. The new parameter R in this model is only dependent on temperature, which directly implies the ratio of spectra contribution by Co metal to CoO.Similar to the XAS fit, all parameters set in this decomposition-fit model were fitted simultaneously by the Blueprint XAS. The results are chosen to be shown as the CoO contribution in Table . In principle, RIXS is a more bulk sensitive technique than TEY XAS since the attenuation depth of the photon is much larger than electrons. Considering the 5 nm (even smaller after the reduction[11]) Co nanoparticles in the current studied materials, the TEY XAS is almost equivalent to the RIXS with respect to the detection depth. On the other hand, the XAS fitted results directly represent the percentage of the CoO and Co metal in the Co nanoparticles, whereas the RIXS fitted results only represent the spectra intensity contribution from either phase. To directly compare the XAS and RIXS fitted results, an extra factor that represents the signal yields a ratio of CoO, and the Co metal phase for the respective RIXS and FL is further needed. With this factor, percentages of the CoO phase can be extracted from the RIXS fitted results, as shown in eq . The signal yield is an intrinsic property of materials, and this ratio is therefore a constant (P) between Co and CoO. In eq , the P represents the ratio of Co FL to CoO RIXS yield by the same unit of respective phases. Here, the constant P in the equation is the relative radiation ratio as discussed above.In the current work, we compared the 2p XAS and 2p3d RIXS fitted results at 500 and 600 °C. We ignored the 2p XAS fitted results of 700 °C because the large uncertainty rendered a larger uncertainty without statistical meanings. The quantification procedure was based on eqs and 2, in which the intensity ratios between CoO RIXS and metal FL were corrected by the corresponding X-ray absorption cross section, to account for the photon-in and photon-out process of RIXS. In contrast to XAS, RIXS quantifications contain an extra relative radiative ratio related to the difference of the Co/CoO spectral intensity yield as stated by eq . This relative radiative ratio (P) is given by the relative (integrated) decay strength of CoO RIXS compared with Co metal fluorescence, which determines the capability of 2p3d RIXS for revealing the minority CoO phase. By comparing the XAS and RIXS fitting results for the 500 and 600 °C data, we deduct that the CoO RIXS is approximately 5 times stronger than the Co metal fluorescence, implying a ratio P = 5. The 700 °C data are not used as the uncertainty in the XAS is almost as large as the determined value. We note that the value P = 5 cannot be determined with good accuracy, and we estimate its uncertainty as large as 20%, based on the limited experiments performed for this goal. A dedicated experiment at various compositions needs to be performed in order to determine this number with more accuracy. Moreover, we note that the lifetime of a state is given by the integrated Auger decay because Auger constitutes more than 99% of the decay. The lifetime broadening of the L3-edge states is usually taken as constant based on calculations of all Auger decay channels for NiO that yield a variation smaller than 20% over the L3 edge.[29] The lifetime broadening of cobalt metal could potentially be different from CoO, where we note that experimental data do not indicate a significant difference. The relative radiative ratio P = 5 should be understood as the ratio between the CoO (RIXS/Auger) ratio and the Co (FL/Auger) ratio. Note that if the radiative decay is relatively stronger for CoO the nonradiative decay should be relatively stronger for Co metal, but now the difference is between 95% and 99% of the total decay, which is difficult to determine. A full study of all radiative and nonradiative decay channels for CoO and Co metal would be interesting for a fundamental knowledge of the creation and decay of 2p core holes in oxides and metals, respectively. For the purposes of the current study, we take the relative radiative ratio P = 5. The converted CoO concentrations obtained, by using this number, are shown in the fourth column of Table . These values can be determined analytically from the spectral weight numbers in column 3. Defining the spectral weight as x, the atomic ratio (xA) can be calculated as xA = x/[P + x – (P*x)]. The sigma values are calculated accordingly. Comparing the relative errors for concentration of the minority phase CoO from columns 2 and 4, we note that the error from XAS averages to ∼5.6%, while in the case of RIXS it averages to 0.8%. Within the present study the RIXS error is affected by the uncertainty in the relative radiative ratio. Once this factor is established, RIXS will become a very accurate technique for the distinction of different phases, especially for the determination of small amounts of oxide phases. It is evident that fitting results from 2p3d RIXS spectra are more precise than those from 2p XAS. In principle, the reported errors reflect primarily the well-resolved characteristic features in RIXS, compared to XAS, as systematic errors get reduced by holistically treating the data. Furthermore, the precision of CoO phase concentrations by RIXS fitting procedures should also be influenced by the precision of the relative radiative ratio obtained. The obtained value, although approximate in nature, suggests that 2p3d RIXS is feasible to probe the minority CoO phase with higher intrinsic accuracy in RIXS than the metallic phase. Future studies should determine the generality of the relative radiative ratio or in other words the relative radiative decay rates of different systems. This is in itself an important factor determined by the nonradiative decay and the radiative decay channels. We believe that the general assumption of a fixed lifetime broadening only determined by the core hole is not valid in the case of 2p core holes in 3d transition metal systems. The general analysis is complicated by the fact that the radiative decay, and to a lesser extent also the nonradiative decay, is energy dependent. We note that using RIXS to enhance the accuracy from XAS is a general approach. In fact the case of CoO and Co metal is one of the most difficult cases due to the large overlap of both XAS spectra. For example, the distinction between XAS spectra of Co2+ oxides and Co3+ oxides is much larger, allowing a much stronger improvement in the quantitative determination of the amounts of Co2+ and Co3+. In such studies it is important (1) to measure the XAS spectra as accurate as possible and (2) to experimentally determine the relative radiative ratio between Co2+ and Co3+.

Concluding Remarks

The fact that 2p3d RIXS has (1) a large variation in sensitivities for different phases and (2) can selectively enhance features of a certain phase via resonant excitations creates an advantage over 2p XAS for studying minority phases. In addition, TEY 2p XAS is limited by the probing depth, and total fluorescence yield 2p XAS may suffer from distorted spectral shapes[29] that complicate theoretical interpretations. By comparison, 2p3d RIXS can detect a bulk phase buried under the surface, and high-resolution spectral features allow more accurate phase determination from theoretical analyses than 2p XAS. We determined accuracies of, respectively, 5.6% for XAS and 0.8% for RIXS. In addition, we have made a first estimate of the relative radiative ratio between CoO and Co metal, as being approximately 5. Further studies need to establish this relative radiative ratio more accurately and generalize its usage to different metal ions. This is the first approach in which multiple chemical phases in an in-situ 2p3d RIXS experiment are effectively decomposed to contributions from individual phases to quantify the corresponding concentrations. By this approach, the minority phase is quantified with much higher precision than that quantified from 2p XAS results. We note that if the X-ray emission resolution in the 2p3d RIXS experiment is improved this will further enhance the capabilities of RIXS for chemical selectivity.
  11 in total

1.  Ultrahigh resolution soft x-ray emission spectrometer at BL07LSU in SPring-8.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Harada; Masaki Kobayashi; Hideharu Niwa; Yasunori Senba; Haruhiko Ohashi; Takashi Tokushima; Yuka Horikawa; Shik Shin; Masaharu Oshima
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.523

2.  Experimental confirmation of the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism sum rules for iron and cobalt.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1995-07-03       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Facile autoreduction of iron oxide/carbon nanotube encapsulates.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Xiulian Pan; Marc-Georg Willinger; Dang Sheng Su; Xinhe Bao
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Local-spin-selective x-ray absorption and x-ray magnetic circular dichroism of MnP.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1995-01-01

5.  Development and exploration of a new methodology for the fitting and analysis of XAS data.

Authors:  Mario Ulises Delgado-Jaime; Pierre Kennepohl
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.616

6.  Blueprint XAS: a Matlab-based toolbox for the fitting and analysis of XAS spectra.

Authors:  Mario Ulises Delgado-Jaime; Craig Philip Mewis; Pierre Kennepohl
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.616

7.  First in situ observation of the LiCoO2 electrode/electrolyte interface by total-reflection X-ray absorption spectroscopy.

Authors:  Daiko Takamatsu; Yukinori Koyama; Yuki Orikasa; Shinichiro Mori; Takayuki Nakatsutsumi; Tatsumi Hirano; Hajime Tanida; Hajime Arai; Yoshiharu Uchimoto; Zempachi Ogumi
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Reactivity of surface species in heterogeneous catalysts probed by in situ X-ray absorption techniques.

Authors:  Silvia Bordiga; Elena Groppo; Giovanni Agostini; Jeroen A van Bokhoven; Carlo Lamberti
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  X-ray nanoscopy of cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalysts at work.

Authors:  Korneel H Cats; Ines D Gonzalez-Jimenez; Yijin Liu; Johanna Nelson; Douglas van Campen; Florian Meirer; Ad M J van der Eerden; Frank M F de Groot; Joy C Andrews; Bert M Weckhuysen
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Transition-Metal Nanoparticle Oxidation in a Chemically Nonhomogenous Environment Revealed by 2p3d Resonant X-ray Emission.

Authors:  Matti M van Schooneveld; Edlira Suljoti; Carlos Campos-Cuerva; Robert W Gosselink; Ad M J van der Eerden; Justine Schlappa; Kejin J Zhou; Claude Monney; Thorsten Schmitt; Frank M F de Groot
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 6.475

View more
  2 in total

1.  X-ray-Based Techniques to Study the Nano-Bio Interface.

Authors:  Carlos Sanchez-Cano; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; John M Abendroth; Tobias Beck; Robert Blick; Yuan Cao; Frank Caruso; Indranath Chakraborty; Henry N Chapman; Chunying Chen; Bruce E Cohen; Andre L C Conceição; David P Cormode; Daxiang Cui; Kenneth A Dawson; Gerald Falkenberg; Chunhai Fan; Neus Feliu; Mingyuan Gao; Elisabetta Gargioni; Claus-C Glüer; Florian Grüner; Moustapha Hassan; Yong Hu; Yalan Huang; Samuel Huber; Nils Huse; Yanan Kang; Ali Khademhosseini; Thomas F Keller; Christian Körnig; Nicholas A Kotov; Dorota Koziej; Xing-Jie Liang; Beibei Liu; Sijin Liu; Yang Liu; Ziyao Liu; Luis M Liz-Marzán; Xiaowei Ma; Andres Machicote; Wolfgang Maison; Adrian P Mancuso; Saad Megahed; Bert Nickel; Ferdinand Otto; Cristina Palencia; Sakura Pascarelli; Arwen Pearson; Oula Peñate-Medina; Bing Qi; Joachim Rädler; Joseph J Richardson; Axel Rosenhahn; Kai Rothkamm; Michael Rübhausen; Milan K Sanyal; Raymond E Schaak; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Marius Schmidt; Oliver Schmutzler; Theo Schotten; Florian Schulz; A K Sood; Kathryn M Spiers; Theresa Staufer; Dominik M Stemer; Andreas Stierle; Xing Sun; Gohar Tsakanova; Paul S Weiss; Horst Weller; Fabian Westermeier; Ming Xu; Huijie Yan; Yuan Zeng; Ying Zhao; Yuliang Zhao; Dingcheng Zhu; Ying Zhu; Wolfgang J Parak
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Using photoelectron spectroscopy to measure resonant inelastic X-ray scattering: a computational investigation.

Authors:  Daniel J Higley; Hirohito Ogasawara; Sioan Zohar; Georgi L Dakovski
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.616

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.