Literature DB >> 20549212

[Clinical autopsies. Practical approach, legal foundations and ethical considerations].

J Friemann1.   

Abstract

Only an autopsy can demonstrate topographical and morphological circumstances in detail and correlate the clinical and autopsy findings based on the examination of all organs. The practical approach in a fatality is described based on the example of the Lüdenscheid Hospital. A uniform legal regulation for dealing with corpses does not exist in Germany. There are two approaches to the question under which circumstances a clinical autopsy is allowed: the extended permission solution and the objection solution. Whether a clinical autopsy can be carried out is decided by the medical specialist selected on application. Autopsies can be necessary from insurance or administrative legal grounds or in the case of an anatomical autopsy is decided by the persons themselves. In order to guarantee the quality of an autopsy it is necessary to use a standardized approach with evaluation and assessment of the results, for example using a quality assurance protocol and the production of an autopsy report. Using this approach important information can be gained not only on the accuracy of the main diagnosis and cause of death but also on additional diseases, response to therapy and the course of the disease and under circumstances can lead to modifications in the approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20549212     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-010-1286-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  11 in total

Review 1.  Exploring brain function with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Di Salle; E Formisano; D E Linden; R Goebel; S Bonavita; A Pepino; F Smaltino; G Tedeschi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  [Unnatural causes of death--what the pathologist must know].

Authors:  R Wegener; J Rummel
Journal:  Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol       Date:  2001

Review 3.  [Hygienic requirements for biopsy and autopsy diagnostics].

Authors:  S Koch; W Schulz-Schaeffer; A Kramer
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  [Recommendations for organ/tissue removal and use in research and teaching].

Authors:  H Höfler
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  [Quality control by autopsy. How often do the postmortem examination findings correct the clinical diagnosis?].

Authors:  T M Bauer; D Potratz; T Göller; A Wagner; R Schäfer
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1991-05-24       Impact factor: 0.628

6.  [Necessity of increasing autopsy frequency following the introduction of DRGs].

Authors:  M G Krukemeyer; C v d Driesch; A Dankof; V Krenn; D Hansen; M Dietel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  [Evaluation of the clinical utility of autopsy: an investigation at the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Leipzig].

Authors:  K Nestler; T Gradistanac; C Wittekind
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  [M. Thali, R. Dirnhofer, P. Vock. The Virtopsy Approach. 3D optical and radiological scanning and reconstruction in forensic medicine (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press. London NW. 2009)].

Authors: 
Journal:  Sud Med Ekspert       Date:  2016

9.  Autopsy as clinical quality control: a study of 15,143 autopsy cases.

Authors:  E Grundmann
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  [Sawdust in autopsies: production, spreading, and contamination].

Authors:  G Kernbach-Wighton; A Kuhlencord; K S Saternus
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.011

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Validation of medical ethical decisions at the bedside by the autopsy : Experience of the ethics committee at the Stuttgart Clinic].

Authors:  A Bosse; C Schupp
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  ["Hic gaudet mors succurere vitae", autopsy findings of the Mainz Institute of Pathology 1971-2010. An analysis on the occasion of the 100 year jubilee].

Authors:  T Hansen; S Höring; F Rosendahl; M Dusolt; C Kempe; M Hechtner; C Sommer; C J Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  [Public perceptions of hospital autopsies: results of a representative survey].

Authors:  A Kahl
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 4.  [Autopsy-a procedure of medical history?].

Authors:  K Petros; C Wittekind
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  [Proposals for standardization of autopsy reports].

Authors:  C Wittekind; J-O Habeck; T Gradistanac
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  [Autopsy rates in Germany].

Authors:  M Grassow-Narlik; M Wessolly; J Friemann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  [Autopsies in Switzerland, Germany and Austria: considerations about legal facts and the current situation].

Authors:  B Tag
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.