Literature DB >> 28840266

Accelerating wheat breeding for end-use quality with multi-trait genomic predictions incorporating near infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance-derived phenotypes.

B J Hayes1,2, J Panozzo3, C K Walker3, A L Choy3, S Kant3, D Wong4, J Tibbits4, H D Daetwyler4,5, S Rochfort4,5, M J Hayden4,5, G C Spangenberg4,5.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Using NIR and NMR predictions of quality traits overcomes a major barrier for the application of genomic selection to accelerate improvement in grain end-use quality traits of wheat. Grain end-use quality traits are among the most important in wheat breeding. These traits are difficult to breed for, as their assays require flour quantities only obtainable late in the breeding cycle, and are expensive. These traits are therefore an ideal target for genomic selection. However, large reference populations are required for accurate genomic predictions, which are challenging to assemble for these traits for the same reasons they are challenging to breed for. Here, we use predictions of end-use quality derived from near infrared (NIR) or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), that require very small amounts of flour, as well as end-use quality measured by industry standard assay in a subset of accessions, in a multi-trait approach for genomic prediction. The NIR and NMR predictions were derived for 19 end-use quality traits in 398 accessions, and were then assayed in 2420 diverse wheat accessions. The accessions were grown out in multiple locations and multiple years, and were genotyped for 51208 SNP. Incorporating NIR and NMR phenotypes in the multi-trait approach increased the accuracy of genomic prediction for most quality traits. The accuracy ranged from 0 to 0.47 before the addition of the NIR/NMR data, while after these data were added, it ranged from 0 to 0.69. Genomic predictions were reasonably robust across locations and years for most traits. Using NIR and NMR predictions of quality traits overcomes a major barrier for the application of genomic selection for grain end-use quality traits in wheat breeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28840266     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-017-2972-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  26 in total

1.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Population- and genome-specific patterns of linkage disequilibrium and SNP variation in spring and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Shiaoman Chao; Jorge Dubcovsky; Jan Dvorak; Ming-Cheng Luo; Stephen P Baenziger; Rustam Matnyazov; Dale R Clark; Luther E Talbert; James A Anderson; Susanne Dreisigacker; Karl Glover; Jianli Chen; Kim Campbell; Phil L Bruckner; Jackie C Rudd; Scott Haley; Brett F Carver; Sid Perry; Mark E Sorrells; Eduard D Akhunov
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.).

Authors:  M F R Resende; P Muñoz; M D V Resende; D J Garrick; R L Fernando; J M Davis; E J Jokela; T A Martin; G F Peter; M Kirst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Differentially penalized regression to predict agronomic traits from metabolites and markers in wheat.

Authors:  Jane Ward; Mariann Rakszegi; Zoltán Bedő; Peter R Shewry; Ian Mackay
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Genomic selection and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa): effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines.

Authors:  Jennifer Spindel; Hasina Begum; Deniz Akdemir; Parminder Virk; Bertrand Collard; Edilberto Redoña; Gary Atlin; Jean-Luc Jannink; Susan R McCouch
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 7.  Wheat quality improvement at CIMMYT and the use of genomic selection on it.

Authors:  Carlos Guzman; Roberto Javier Peña; Ravi Singh; Enrique Autrique; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jose Crossa; Jessica Rutkoski; Jesse Poland; Sarah Battenfield
Journal:  Appl Transl Genom       Date:  2016-10-29

8.  Imputation of unordered markers and the impact on genomic selection accuracy.

Authors:  Jessica E Rutkoski; Jesse Poland; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Increased genomic prediction accuracy in wheat breeding through spatial adjustment of field trial data.

Authors:  Bettina Lado; Ivan Matus; Alejandra Rodríguez; Luis Inostroza; Jesse Poland; François Belzile; Alejandro del Pozo; Martín Quincke; Marina Castro; Jarislav von Zitzewitz
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Increased Proportion of Variance Explained and Prediction Accuracy of Survival of Breast Cancer Patients with Use of Whole-Genome Multiomic Profiles.

Authors:  Ana I Vazquez; Yogasudha Veturi; Michael Behring; Sadeep Shrestha; Matias Kirst; Marcio F R Resende; Gustavo de Los Campos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Phenomic Selection: A New and Efficient Alternative to Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Pauline Robert; Charlotte Brault; Renaud Rincent; Vincent Segura
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Comparison of single-trait and multi-trait genomic predictions on agronomic and disease resistance traits in spring wheat.

Authors:  Kassa Semagn; José Crossa; Jaime Cuevas; Muhammad Iqbal; Izabela Ciechanowska; Maria Antonia Henriquez; Harpinder Randhawa; Brian L Beres; Reem Aboukhaddour; Brent D McCallum; Anita L Brûlé-Babel; Amidou N'Diaye; Curtis Pozniak; Dean Spaner
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.574

3.  Combining NDVI and Bacterial Blight Score to Predict Grain Yield in Field Pea.

Authors:  Huanhuan Zhao; Babu R Pandey; Majid Khansefid; Hossein V Khahrood; Shimna Sudheesh; Sameer Joshi; Surya Kant; Sukhjiwan Kaur; Garry M Rosewarne
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Extend mixed models to multilayer neural networks for genomic prediction including intermediate omics data.

Authors:  Tianjing Zhao; Jian Zeng; Hao Cheng
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Genetic evaluation including intermediate omics features.

Authors:  Ole F Christensen; Vinzent Börner; Luis Varona; Andres Legarra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 6.  Breeding crops to feed 10 billion.

Authors:  Lee T Hickey; Amber N Hafeez; Hannah Robinson; Scott A Jackson; Soraya C M Leal-Bertioli; Mark Tester; Caixia Gao; Ian D Godwin; Ben J Hayes; Brande B H Wulff
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 7.  From markers to genome-based breeding in wheat.

Authors:  Awais Rasheed; Xianchun Xia
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 8.  Accelerating crop genetic gains with genomic selection.

Authors:  Kai Peter Voss-Fels; Mark Cooper; Ben John Hayes
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Prediction of complex phenotypes using the Drosophila melanogaster metabolome.

Authors:  Palle Duun Rohde; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Pernille Sarup; Joaquin Muñoz; Anders Malmendal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Genome-based prediction of agronomic traits in spring wheat under conventional and organic management systems.

Authors:  Kassa Semagn; Muhammad Iqbal; José Crossa; Diego Jarquin; Reka Howard; Hua Chen; Darcy H Bemister; Brian L Beres; Harpinder Randhawa; Amidou N'Diaye; Curtis Pozniak; Dean Spaner
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.