Literature DB >> 28839591

Colorectal cancer detection: time to abandon barium enema?

M K Shariff1, K Sheikh1, N R Carroll2, S Whitley2, D Greenberg3, M Parkes1, E A B Cameron1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity of double contrast barium enema (DCBE) for diagnosing colorectal cancer (CRC).
DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of DCBE performed in the 2 years prior to diagnosis of CRC.
SETTING: Teaching hospital in Cambridge, UK. PATIENTS: 1310 consecutive cases of CRC identified from cancer registry data.
INTERVENTIONS: DCBE and colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity of DCBE for diagnosing CRC.
RESULTS: 215 patients had undergone a DCBE within the 2 years prior to diagnosis with CRC. After excluding those reported as inadequate, 37 of these were reported as normal, giving a sensitivity of 83% (81-85%).
CONCLUSIONS: The performance of DCBE is inadequate for the exclusion of CRC. Expansion of colonoscopy and CT colonography capacity is urgently required nationally so that DCBE can finally be abandoned as a firstline test in patients at risk of CRC.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 28839591      PMCID: PMC5517211          DOI: 10.1136/fg.2010.003616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  13 in total

1.  Double contrast barium enema sensitivity: a comparison of studies by radiographers and radiologists.

Authors:  D G Culpan; A J Mitchell; S Hughes; M Nutman; A H Chapman
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Cancer incidence and mortality in the United Kingdom and constituent countries, 2003-05.

Authors:  Susan Westlake
Journal:  Health Stat Q       Date:  2008

Review 3.  A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  E R Fearon; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Sensitivity of double contrast barium enema and colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  G A Smith; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Barium enema and endoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia: sensitivity, specificity, complications and its determinants.

Authors:  I M de Zwart; G Griffioen; M P Shaw; C B Lamers; A de Roos
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Rates of new or missed colorectal cancer after barium enema and their risk factors: a population-based study.

Authors:  Jonathan Toma; Lawrence F Paszat; Nadia Gunraj; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Observer variation in the detection of colorectal neoplasia on double-contrast barium enema: implications for colorectal cancer screening and training.

Authors:  S Halligan; M Marshall; S Taylor; C Bartram; P Bassett; C Cardwell; W Atkin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Audit of the introduction of CT colonography for detection of colorectal carcinoma in a non-academic environment and its implications for the national bowel cancer screening programme.

Authors:  S Thomas; J Atchley; A Higginson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  2 in total

1.  Scope to improve: a multi-centre audit of 16 064 colonoscopies looking at caecal intubation rates, over a 2-year period.

Authors:  Ajay Mark Verma; Nadine McGrath; Paula Bennett; John de Caestecker; Andrew Dixon; Jayne Eaden; Peter Wurm; Andrew Chilton
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-01

2.  Safe investigation of isolated change in bowel habit with a flexible sigmoidoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pjj Herrod; H Boyd-Carson; B Doleman; Jem Blackwell; Ejo Hardy; F Harper; J N Lund
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 1.891

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.