Literature DB >> 30855983

Safe investigation of isolated change in bowel habit with a flexible sigmoidoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pjj Herrod1, H Boyd-Carson1, B Doleman1, Jem Blackwell1, Ejo Hardy1, F Harper1, J N Lund1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Public awareness campaigns have led to increasing referrals of patients to colorectal surgery for possible cancer. Change in bowel habit, is traditionally described as a symptom of a left sided bowel cancer. If this is the case in practice, it raises the potentially attractive option of investigating such patients with flexible sigmoidoscopy only. This study sought to systematically review the literature describing tumour location of patients with bowel cancer presenting with left-sided symptoms to establish the safety of potential investigation of these patients with flexible sigmoidoscopy alone.
METHODS: A systematic review of studies reporting both the presenting symptoms of patients with bowel cancer and the location of their cancer in the bowel was prospectively registered (CRD42017072492). MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched with no date or language restriction.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included. Isolated change in bowel habit (with or without rectal bleeding) was a presenting symptom of 73% (95% CI 41-96%, I2 = 99%) of left-sided cancers but also in 13% (95% CI 2-30%, I2 = 96%) of right-sided cancers. In all patients with cancer who presented with isolated change in bowel habit (with or without rectal bleeding), the cancer was right sided in 8% (95% CI 4-12%, I2 = 69%).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a higher than expected risk that if a cancer is diagnosed in a patient presenting with either an isolated change in bowel habit or a combination of change in bowel habit with rectal bleeding, the cancer may be right sided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon and rectal surgery; Colon cancer; Meta-analysis; Rectal cancer; Systematic reviews

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30855983      PMCID: PMC6554564          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  33 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of 750 patients with colon cancer; diagnostic survey and follow-up covering a fifteen-year period.

Authors:  T A SHALLOW; F B WAGNER; R E COLCHER
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1955-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  'Be Clear on Cancer': the impact of the UK National Bowel Cancer Awareness Campaign.

Authors:  O Peacock; S Clayton; F Atkinson; G M Tierney; J N Lund
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias.

Authors:  James P Hunter; Athanasios Saratzis; Alex J Sutton; Rebecca H Boucher; Robert D Sayers; Matthew J Bown
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Straight to flexible sigmoidoscopy: rationalization of 2-week wait referrals in suspected colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D G Couch; J H Murphy; K M Boyle; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  The use of symptoms to predict colorectal cancer site. Can we reduce the pressure on our endoscopy services?

Authors:  A J Kent; D Woolf; J McCue; S M Greenfield
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Incidental finding of colorectal cancer in screening colonoscopy and its cost effectiveness.

Authors:  Chichi Berhane; David Denning
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data.

Authors:  Victoria N Nyaga; Marc Arbyn; Marc Aerts
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2014-11-10

9.  Do colorectal cancer patients diagnosed as an emergency differ from non-emergency patients in their consultation patterns and symptoms? A longitudinal data-linkage study in England.

Authors:  C Renzi; G Lyratzopoulos; T Card; T P C Chu; U Macleod; B Rachet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Øyvind Holme; Robert E Schoen; Carlo Senore; Nereo Segnan; Geir Hoff; Magnus Løberg; Michael Bretthauer; Hans-Olov Adami; Mette Kalager
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.