Literature DB >> 16500319

Randomized comparison of two different blastocyst grading systems.

Basak Balaban1, Kayhan Yakin, Bulent Urman.   

Abstract

A more detailed blastocyst grading system provides a better selection of blastocysts with the highest implantation potential. Grading systems will help to decrease the number of blastocysts to be transferred without compromising high implantation and pregnancy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16500319     DOI： 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN： 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  Morphokinetic parameters using time-lapse technology and day 5 embryo quality: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ashleigh Storr; Christos A Venetis; Simon Cooke; Daisy Susetio; Suha Kilani; William Ledger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Trophectoderm morphology predicts outcomes of pregnancy in vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfer cycle in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Xiaojiao Chen; Junqiang Zhang; Xun Wu; Shanren Cao; Lin Zhou; Ying Wang; Xin Chen; Jin Lu; Chun Zhao; Minjian Chen; Xiufeng Ling
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  A quantitative approach to blastocyst quality evaluation: morphometric analysis and related IVF outcomes.

Authors:  Cristina Lagalla; Marzia Barberi; Giovanna Orlando; Raffaella Sciajno; Maria Antonietta Bonu; Andrea Borini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Blastocyst classification systems used in Latin America: is a consensus possible?

Authors:  Tatiana Puga-Torres; Xavier Blum-Rojas; Medardo Blum-Narváez
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01

5.  Association between amino acid turnover and chromosome aneuploidy during human preimplantation embryo development in vitro.

Authors:  Helen M Picton; Kay Elder; Franchesca D Houghton; Judith A Hawkhead; Anthony J Rutherford; Jan E Hogg; Henry J Leese; Sarah E Harris
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Uterine flushing with supernatant embryo culture medium in vitrified warmed blastocyst transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohan S Kamath; Mariona Mascarenhas; Kanchanadevi B; Nidhi N Vasani; Asmita Joshi; Muthukumar K; Korula George
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Is the presence of an uncleaved embryo on day 3 a useful predictor of outcomes following day 5 transfer?

Authors:  Clara J Men; Charles L Bormann; Brian W Walsh; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  A review on automatic analysis of human embryo microscope images.

Authors:  E Santos Filho; J A Noble; D Wells
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2010-10-11

Review 9.  Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?

Authors:  José C Rocha; Felipe Passalia; Felipe D Matos; Marc P Maserati; Mayra F Alves; Tamie G de Almeida; Bruna L Cardoso; Andrea C Basso; Marcelo F G Nogueira
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2016-08-01

10.  Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  K Muthukumar; Mohan S Kamath; Ann M Mangalaraj; Tk Aleyamma; Achamma Chandy; Korula George
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.