Literature DB >> 28836917

Multiple Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the DASS-21 Depression and Anxiety Scales: How Do They Perform in a Cancer Sample?

Rina S Fox1, Teresa A Lillis2, James Gerhart2, Michael Hoerger3, Paul Duberstein4.   

Abstract

The DASS-21 is a public domain instrument that is commonly used to evaluate depression and anxiety in psychiatric and community populations; however, the factor structure of the measure has not previously been examined in oncologic settings. Given that the psychometric properties of measures of distress may be compromised in the context of symptoms related to cancer and its treatment, the present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the DASS-21 Depression and Anxiety scales in cancer patients ( n = 376) as compared to noncancer control participants ( n = 207). Cancer patients ranged in age from 21 to 84 years (mean = 58.3, standard deviation = 10.4) and noncancer control participants ranged in age from 18 to 81 years (mean = 45.0, standard deviation = 11.7). Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis supported the structural invariance of the DASS-21 Depression and Anxiety scales across groups; the factor variance/covariance invariance model was the best fit to the data. Cronbach's coefficient alpha values demonstrated acceptable internal consistency reliability across the total sample as well as within subgroups of cancer patients and noncancer control participants. Expected relationships of DASS-21 Depression and Anxiety scale scores to measures of suicidal ideation, quality of life, self-rated health, and depressed mood supported construct validity. These results support the psychometric properties of the DASS-21 Depression and Anxiety scales when measuring psychological distress in cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DASS-21; anxiety; cancer; depression; psychometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836917      PMCID: PMC6053047          DOI: 10.1177/0033294117727747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  29 in total

1.  Optimism, social support, and mental health outcomes in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Allison J Applebaum; Emma M Stein; Jennifer Lord-Bessen; Hayley Pessin; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  ResearchMatch: a national registry to recruit volunteers for clinical research.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Kirstin W Scott; Laurie Lebo; Niknik Hassan; Chad Lightner; Jill Pulley
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karen B DeSalvo; Nicole Bloser; Kristi Reynolds; Jiang He; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The utility of the short version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) in elderly patients with persistent pain: does age make a difference?

Authors:  Bradley M Wood; Michael K Nicholas; Fiona Blyth; Ali Asghari; Stephen Gibson
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 7.  Tertiary prevention in cancer care: understanding and addressing the psychological dimensions of cancer during the active treatment period.

Authors:  Paul B Jacobsen; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2015 Feb-Mar

8.  The validity of the 21-item version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales as a routine clinical outcome measure.

Authors:  Felicity Ng; Tom Trauer; Seetal Dodd; Tom Callaly; Shirley Campbell; Michael Berk
Journal:  Acta Neuropsychiatr       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.403

9.  Assessing clinical significance of treatment outcomes using the DASS-21.

Authors:  Fiona R Ronk; James R Korman; Geoffrey R Hooke; Andrew C Page
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2013-06-03

10.  Validation of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) 21 as a screening instrument for depression and anxiety in a rural community-based cohort of northern Vietnamese women.

Authors:  Thach Duc Tran; Tuan Tran; Jane Fisher
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.630

View more
  14 in total

1.  Financial Strain and Physical and Emotional Quality of Life in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Laura M Perry; Michael Hoerger; Katherine Seibert; James I Gerhart; Sean O'Mahony; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on supportive care needs, psychological distress and quality of life in UK cancer survivors and their support network.

Authors:  Nicholas J Hulbert-Williams; Monica Leslie; Lee Hulbert-Williams; Eilidh Smith; Lesley Howells; David J Pinato
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.328

3.  Factor structure of the depression anxiety stress Scale-21 (DASS-21): Unidimensionality of the Arabic version among Egyptian drug users.

Authors:  Amira Mohammed Ali; Joseph Green
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2019-09-18

4.  The modulatory role of internet-supported mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on extracellular vesicles and psychological distress in people who have had cancer: a protocol for a two-armed randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Diana R Pereira; Eunice R Silva; Carina Carvalho-Maia; Sara Monteiro-Reis; Catarina Lourenço; Rita Calisto; Ricardo João Teixeira; Linda E Carlson; Genevieve Bart; Seppo J Vainio; M Goreti F Sales; Carmen Jerónimo; Rui Henrique
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  The benefits and acceptability of virtual reality interventions for women with metastatic breast cancer in their homes; a pilot randomised trial.

Authors:  Lisa M Reynolds; Alana Cavadino; Stanley Chin; Zoë Little; Amelia Akroyd; Geraldine Tennant; Rosie Dobson; Reuben Broom; Adèle Gautier
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Protocol for the implementation of a stepped-care model to address fear of cancer recurrence in patients previously diagnosed with early-stage (0-II) melanoma.

Authors:  Jake R Thompson; Andrea L Smith; Serigne N Lo; Nadine A Kasparian; Robyn Pm Saw; Mbathio Dieng; Linda Seaman; Linda K Martin; Pascale Guitera; Donna Milne; Helen Schmid; Anne E Cust; Iris Bartula
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The untold story of late effects: a qualitative analysis of breast cancer survivors' emotional responses to late effects.

Authors:  Jodie Rosenberg; Phyllis N Butow; Joanne M Shaw
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Video decision support tool promoting values conversations in advanced care planning in cancer: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Natasha Michael; Clare O'Callaghan; Ekavi Georgousopoulou; Adelaide Melia; Merlina Sulistio; David Kissane
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Mental Health Measurement in a Post Covid-19 World: Psychometric Properties and Invariance of the DASS-21 in Athletes and Non-athletes.

Authors:  Robert S Vaughan; Elizabeth J Edwards; Tadhg E MacIntyre
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-22

10.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Three Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-42, DASS-21, and DASS-12) in Polish Adults.

Authors:  Marta Makara-Studzińska; Ernest Tyburski; Maciej Załuski; Katarzyna Adamczyk; Jacek Mesterhazy; Agnieszka Mesterhazy
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.