Literature DB >> 28836453

Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Pathology of the Hand.

Sheriff D Akinleye1, Garret Garofolo-Gonzalez1, Michael Montuori2, Maya Deza Culbertson1, Jennifer Hashem1, David Marc Edelstein1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Medical Association (AMA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommend that patient education materials be written at no higher than a sixth-grade reading level.
METHODS: We examined 100 online educational materials for the 10 hand conditions most commonly treated by hand surgeons, as reported by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. The listed conditions were carpal tunnel syndrome, basal joint arthritis of the thumb, de Quervain syndrome, Dupuytren's contracture, ganglion cysts, hand fractures, trigger finger, extensor tendon injuries, flexor tendon injuries, and mallet finger. Following a Google search for each condition, we analyzed the 10 most visited websites for each disorder utilizing the Flesch-Kincaid formula.
RESULTS: The average grade reading level of the 100 websites studied was 9.49 with a reading ease of 53.03 ("fairly difficult high school"). Only 29% of the websites were at or below the national average of an eighth-grade reading level. Carpal tunnel syndrome had the highest average grade reading level at 10.32 (standard deviation: 1.52), whereas hand fractures had the lowest at 8.14 (2.03). Every hand condition in this study had an average readability at or above the ninth-grade reading level.
CONCLUSIONS: The most frequently accessed materials for common maladies of the hand exceed both the readability limits recommended by the AMA and NIH, and the average reading ability of most US adults. Therefore, the most commonly accessed websites pertaining to hand pathology may not be comprehended by the audience for which it is intended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASSH; Flesch-Kincaid; Google; hand conditions; readability; reading level

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836453      PMCID: PMC6300184          DOI: 10.1177/1558944717726138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  19 in total

1.  Readability of online patient education materials on adult reconstruction Web sites.

Authors:  Daniil L Polishchuk; Jenifer Hashem; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information.

Authors:  Daniela B Friedman; Laurie Hoffman-Goetz
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2006-06

3.  Readability of original articles in surgical journals.

Authors:  John Ludbrook
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Readability of online patient education materials from the AAOS web site.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sabharwal; Sameer Badarudeen; Shebna Unes Kunju
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Readability of arthroscopy-related patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America Web sites.

Authors:  Paul H Yi; Abhishek Ganta; Khalil I Hussein; Rachel M Frank; Andrew Jawa
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 6.  Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  J Albright; C de Guzman; P Acebo; D Paiva; M Faulkner; J Swanson
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.257

7.  Patients' use of the Internet for medical information.

Authors:  Joseph A Diaz; Rebecca A Griffith; James J Ng; Steven E Reinert; Peter D Friedmann; Anne W Moulton
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.

Authors:  Adam E M Eltorai; Pranav Sharma; Jing Wang; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  How long does it take to assess literacy skills in clinical practice?

Authors:  Kristen Johnson; Barry D Weiss
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

10.  Access and use of the internet in a hand surgery population.

Authors:  Jennifer Moriatis Wolf; Mark Ritter; Arnold-Peter C Weiss; Edward Akelman
Journal:  Hand Surg       Date:  2004-07
View more
  5 in total

1.  Letter to Editor: Comments on "Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Pathology of the Hand".

Authors:  Mark R Nazal; Ali Parsa; Scott D Martin
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-07-17

2.  Response to Letter Regarding "Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Pathology of the Hand".

Authors:  Sheriff D Akinleye; Garret Garofolo-Gonzalez; Michael Montuori; Maya Deza Culbertson; Jennifer Hashem; David Marc Edelstein
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-07-31

3.  Kienböck Disease: Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Information.

Authors:  Peter C Noback; David P Trofa; Lucas K Dziesinski; Evan P Trupia; Samuel Galle; Melvin P Rosenwasser
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-12-16

4.  The Effects of Postoperative Physician Phone Calls for Hand and Wrist Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Scott N Loewenstein; Eric Pittelkow; Vasil V Kukushliev; Ivan Hadad; Joshua Adkinson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-14

5.  Hand It to Dr Google: The Quality of Online Information on Ganglion Cysts.

Authors:  Tianshu Angela Ji; Neil Wells; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-01-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.