Literature DB >> 22000573

Readability of online patient education materials on adult reconstruction Web sites.

Daniil L Polishchuk1, Jenifer Hashem, Sanjeev Sabharwal.   

Abstract

Recommended readability of patient education materials is sixth-grade level or lower. Readability of 212 patient education materials pertaining to adult reconstruction topics available from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, and 3 other specialty and private practitioner Web sites was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid grade formula. The mean Flesch-Kincaid score was 11.1 (range, 3-26.5). Only 5 (2%) articles had a readability level of sixth grade or lower. Readability of most of the articles for patient education on adult reconstruction Web sites evaluated may be too advanced for a substantial portion of patients. Further studies are needed to assess the optimal readability level of health information on the Internet.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22000573     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  19 in total

1.  Does the quality, accuracy, and readability of information about lateral epicondylitis on the internet vary with the search term used?

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Samuel A Taylor; Ronak M Patel; Moira M McCarthy; Timothy R Roberts; Aaron Daluiski
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-12

2.  Online nutrition information for pregnant women: a content analysis.

Authors:  Tayla Storr; Judith Maher; Elizabeth Swanepoel
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Patient Resources for the Management of Articular Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  Dean Wang; Rohit G Jayakar; Natalie L Leong; Michael P Leathers; Riley J Williams; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Readability of patient education materials from the AAHS.

Authors:  Paul H Yi; Michelle M Chang; Bryan D Haughom; Andrew Jawa
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-09

5.  Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Pathology of the Hand.

Authors:  Sheriff D Akinleye; Garret Garofolo-Gonzalez; Michael Montuori; Maya Deza Culbertson; Jennifer Hashem; David Marc Edelstein
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-08-24

6.  Kienböck Disease: Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Information.

Authors:  Peter C Noback; David P Trofa; Lucas K Dziesinski; Evan P Trupia; Samuel Galle; Melvin P Rosenwasser
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-12-16

7.  Reading grade level and completeness of freely available materials on thyroid nodules: there is work to be done.

Authors:  J Aaron Barnes; Louise Davies
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 6.568

8.  Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.

Authors:  Adam E M Eltorai; Pranav Sharma; Jing Wang; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The internet as a source of information for De Quervain's tendinitis.

Authors:  James C Heap; Bobby Dezfuli; David M Bennett; Eric Chapman; Gregory L DeSilva
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-03

10.  Readability of Invasive Procedure Consent Forms.

Authors:  Adam E M Eltorai; Syed S Naqvi; Soha Ghanian; Craig P Eberson; Arnold-Peter C Weiss; Christopher T Born; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.