Literature DB >> 28836105

Surgical and pathological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the community setting.

E M DiLizia1, F Sadeghi2.   

Abstract

Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with urinary diversion is commonly performed in community hospitals. While little data exist on RARC outcomes in this setting, community hospitals may improve access to care for bladder cancer patients. We conducted a retrospective review of 76 patients who underwent RARC between 2006 and 2016 by two robotic-trained surgeons in two local community hospitals. A total of 76 patients (60 males and 16 females; ages 46-89) underwent RARC with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy and urinary diversion (69 ileal conduits, 7 neobladders) for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (79%), recurrent high-grade carcinoma (17%), unresectable tumor (2%), or refractory gross hematuria from chemotherapy (2%). Median-estimated surgical blood loss (EBL) was 400 mL, and median operating time was 386 min. Transfusion rate was 22% and median length of hospital stay was 6 days. Our 90-day complication rate was 47%, with no mortalities in the 90-day post-operative period. The majority of complications (58%) were Clavien grade 1-2. We observed a significant difference in incidence of complications among patients receiving neobladder vs. ileal conduit (p = 0.002). On pathology, zero patients had positive bladder specimen margins. Among 28 patients with at least 3-year follow-up, overall survival was 85.7%, and among 9 patients with at least 5-year follow-up, overall survival was 100%. Contrary to some studies, our findings suggest similar short-term surgical and pathologic outcomes for RARC performed in the community hospital setting compared to high volume centers. We defined several criteria for low volume centers to effectively and safely perform RARC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Community; Radical cystectomy; Robotic assisted laparoscopy; Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836105     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0740-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  35 in total

1.  Modified Indiana pouch.

Authors:  T E Ahlering; A C Weinberg; B Razor
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting early outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Kaiwen Li; Tianxin Lin; Xinxiang Fan; Kewei Xu; Liangkuan Bi; Yu Duan; Yu Zhou; Min Yu; Jielin Li; Jian Huang
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 3.  Robotic vs. open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Tang; D Xia; H Li; W Guan; X Guo; Z Hu; X Ma; X Zhang; H Xu; Z Ye
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Volume-based referral for cancer surgery: informing the debate.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; Rodney L Dunn; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; David A Taub; John T Wei
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and extracorporeal continent urinary diversion: highlight of surgical techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  D Y Josephson; J A Chen; K G Chan; C S Lau; R A Nelson; T G Wilson
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.547

6.  Perioperative complications and oncological safety of robot-assisted (RARC) vs. open radical cystectomy (ORC).

Authors:  Günter Niegisch; Peter Albers; Robert Rabenalt
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical cystectomy: comparison of complications and perioperative oncological outcomes in 200 patients.

Authors:  A Karim Kader; Kyle A Richards; L Spencer Krane; Joseph A Pettus; John J Smith; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Propensity-matched comparison of morbidity and costs of open and robot-assisted radical cystectomies: a contemporary population-based analysis in the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Stephen W Reese; Wei Jiang; Stuart R Lipsitz; Joaquim Bellmunt; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Benjamin I Chung; Adam S Kibel; Steven L Chang
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Robotic versus open radical cystectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leilei Xia; Xianjin Wang; Tianyuan Xu; Xiaohua Zhang; Zhaowei Zhu; Liang Qin; Xiang Zhang; Chen Fang; Minguang Zhang; Shan Zhong; Zhoujun Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Relationship between Centralization of Care and Geographic Barriers to Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Martin F Casey; Juan Wisnivesky; Valerie H Le; Umut Sarpel; Kristian D Stensland; William K Oh; Matthew D Galsky
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2016-07-27
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The current status of robot-assisted cystectomy.

Authors:  Stavros Ioannis Tyritzis; Justin W Collins; Nils Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 2.  The complementary value of intraoperative fluorescence imaging and Raman spectroscopy for cancer surgery: combining the incompatibles.

Authors:  L J Lauwerends; H Abbasi; T C Bakker Schut; P B A A Van Driel; J A U Hardillo; I P Santos; E M Barroso; S Koljenović; A L Vahrmeijer; R J Baatenburg de Jong; G J Puppels; S Keereweer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 10.057

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.